This.Lycoming wrote: snip
We wouldn't have this problem if they distributed more of the TV revenues to the small teams
snip
I am a firm believer that all teams, irrespective of their position in last year's championship(s), should receive exactly the same amount as each other from the TV revenues pot. Why should the winning teams receive more? It makes no sense. They already receive more by being able to charge 10x more for a square inch of ad space on the mirror housing.
But this will only happen when the teams themselves own the sport, and therefore have equal arguing...sorry, voting rights - I believe the major US sports leagues (NFL, NBA, etc) are owned like this, no?