j2004p wrote:LookBackTime wrote:Craig Scarborough @ScarbsTech
Narrow sidepods despite wider versions allowed. Engine cover conspicuously size-zero-esque behind cockpit padding & around fin
I've got to be honest, I never thought any team was going to take up the option of wider sidepods since the packaging requirements inside the car weren't going to change it didn't make much sense to me.
From increased width overall of the floor and track anyone keeping their sidepod width as before would automatically get whatever benefit Sauber tried to conjure a few years ago with their ridiculously slim sidepods.
I'm probably missing something.
Lower COG with wider, more spread out packaging as opposed to thinner and higher?