I can imagine it would be about the vortices and turbulence generated by the neutral shapes. Some groups choose to have it on the nose (i.e. Red Bull) to perhaps have the turbulence be transitioned through the turning vanes into smooth flow.MIKEY_! wrote:What is the possible benefit of having the cameras mounted further back on the nose?
I would say you need a wing profile to generate a vortex. The AoA could actually create a flow that goes straight back.humble sabot wrote:It's interesting to note the orientation of the wing profile, definitely seems to be pointing outwards. To quicken the flow inboard a bit and so help keep it attached on its way down the sidepod?
Code: Select all
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xr8jc5_helmet-cam-onboard-paul-di-resta-monaco-2012_auto
Discussion continues in the dedicated thread: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=12916Brian Jee (@brianjee) wrote:RPM level is validated from bite-point find clutch scrubs during FP sessions. That’s how they also define the number of burnouts for tire temp and clutch surface “cleanliness”.
Clutch paddles have position sensors, they’re not just switches that are “dumped.” As such, their displacement vs rpm is mapped. Clutch maps are tuned for each driver preference and the results of bite-point find data from FP sessions.