You're almost certainly right. And it was my first assumption as well. I'm just spitballing, wondering if they went extra creative on it. It's not ideal for maintaining the tyres' angle with the tarmac anyway, but would, if somebody wanted to, give an incredible amount of freedom in the underbody.VARIANT | one wrote:I'm guessing it's more like the Nissan P35 / NPT-93 with the lower A-arms pulled all the way up almost in line with the half shafts:humble sabot wrote:So, thinking about the rear suspension. .......
http://www.mulsannescorner.com/Nissan-CR7.jpg
They did an excellent job on the unit in the One-77 by all accounts, and I'm fairly sure the Champ connection is not relevant, meaning this is the same outfit, give or take some personnel changes over the past couple years, as had their hands deep in F1 engines as recently as 2014. Earth shattering maybe not on the last count, they didn't find a customer, but they've still been playing in the same range and do have an institutional memory that ought (if records haven't been destroyed) to help with accomplishing their goals. And they did manage to be the ones who turned out the highest revving engine of the F1 NA era.Just_a_fan wrote:Not sure I understand the aura around Cosworth these days. They certainly are not the same company that did the good stuff back in the day. Their last foray in to F1 wasn't exactly Earth shattering.
Also, does "Cosworth" mean the one owned by the Champ Car guys or the one owned by Mahle (i.e. Mahle Powertrains)?
https://joesaward.wordpress.com/2017/02 ... f1-fact75/The 900hp Cosworth V12 which will be seen in the Adrian Newey-designed Aston Martin AM-RB 001 supercar, for example, can trace its roots back to Porsche, which created a 60-degree V6 engine back in the early 1990s, but then decided not to use it for production cars. The design was sold to Ford and the resulting engine was the Ford Duratec V6, an aluminum unit with dual overhead camshafts. The designers at Cosworth, which was then owned by Ford, then mated two of these engines end-to-end and created the 6-litre V12, which ended up belonging to Cosworth and being used by Aston Martin in its 1999 DB7 Vantage.
It's a good thought, but I'd gander a guess that geared hubs would add far to much weight to both the car and the rear unsprung masses.humble sabot wrote:You're almost certainly right. And it was my first assumption as well. I'm just spitballing, wondering if they went extra creative on it. It's not ideal for maintaining the tyres' angle with the tarmac anyway, but would, if somebody wanted to, give an incredible amount of freedom in the underbody.VARIANT | one wrote:I'm guessing it's more like the Nissan P35 / NPT-93 with the lower A-arms pulled all the way up almost in line with the half shafts:humble sabot wrote:So, thinking about the rear suspension. .......
http://www.mulsannescorner.com/Nissan-CR7.jpg
The rear and front will both change to make sure the car is legal, so expect the production car to be slightly differentPeter1919 wrote:The rear and side views look great but that front view is IMHO very ugly
OR, like these, raising the arm mountingVARIANT | one wrote:I'm guessing it's more like the Nissan P35 / NPT-93 with the lower A-arms pulled all the way up almost in line with the half shafts:humble sabot wrote:So, thinking about the rear suspension. I was wondering, would it make sense to fit a long control arm setup? Or is it conceivable that they might be going a similar way to Ron Mathis, who's also a race car designer working on a road car platform:
http://static3.consumerreportscdn.org/e ... ension.jpg
I do wonder if it would still be so light if it was engineered to deal with 4g of cornering, but it apparently works pretty well on the 900-1000lb Edison 2
Pretty sure the GTR LM Nismo setup isn't germane since it's unpowered and the geometry doesn't fit.
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/wp-c ... upnis6.jpg
http://www.mulsannescorner.com/Nissan-CR7.jpg
http://www.mulsannescorner.com/Nissan-CR18.jpg
http://www.mulsannescorner.com/Nissan-CR5.jpg
http://www.mulsannescorner.com/Nissan-AG16.jpg
It essentially is. The upper pivot mounting on the P35 is ~515 mm from the RP, where the Merc and Torro Rosso is ~450 mm (yes, I make CAD drawings of all this stuff ).N44_wi wrote: ↑15 Mar 2017, 06:02VARIANT | one wrote:I'm guessing it's more like the Nissan P35 / NPT-93 with the lower A-arms pulled all the way up almost in line with the half shafts:humble sabot wrote:So, thinking about the rear suspension. I was wondering, would it make sense to fit a long control arm setup? Or is it conceivable that they might be going a similar way to Ron Mathis, who's also a race car designer working on a road car platform:
http://static3.consumerreportscdn.org/e ... ension.jpg
I do wonder if it would still be so light if it was engineered to deal with 4g of cornering, but it apparently works pretty well on the 900-1000lb Edison 2
Pretty sure the GTR LM Nismo setup isn't germane since it's unpowered and the geometry doesn't fit.
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/wp-c ... upnis6.jpg
http://www.mulsannescorner.com/Nissan-CR7.jpg
http://www.mulsannescorner.com/Nissan-CR18.jpg
http://www.mulsannescorner.com/Nissan-CR5.jpg
http://www.mulsannescorner.com/Nissan-AG16.jpg
OR, like these, raising the arm mounting
http://www.formulapassion.it/wp-content ... Custom.jpg
http://www.formulapassion.it/wp-content ... 840776.jpg
That was an interesting video. Reposted below for those that get the error.FW17 wrote: ↑16 May 2017, 16:30So do you think the Aston Martin Redbull will beat this Chinese car
https://cnet3.cbsistatic.com/img/pT_zTF ... -ep9-1.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcepG9Twa_8