6-stroke engines

Post anything that doesn't belong in any other forum, including gaming and topics unrelated to motorsport. Site specific discussions should go in the site feedback forum.
User avatar
Ciro Pabón
106
Joined: 11 May 2005, 00:31

Post

Well, I do not think you have to look for any other explanation: Miller engines do not claim better efficiency. They claim better horsepower, wich agrees with your post. It is logical to conclude that this extra-horsepower comes at the expense of more gas, given its design. Thanx for this nice post, joseff: it shows that there are few "free rides" in engine design, which is another reason for us to see the six-cycle engine with a critical eye.

Miller engines are another way of tweaking the Otto-cycle, that is why I found them relevant. Yes, I know I posted about them when I talked about other types of engines and the gasoline shortage, but then they also seemed relevant. I am not particularly in love with them. :wink:

I guess there are many similar ideas: for example, take a look at how you can use back-pressure in the exhaust chamber to "get rid" of valves in two-stroke engines (piston is at left, exhaust at right, red is burnt gas, blue is fresh air-gas mixture). It is sort of a "Miller-type" tweaking, but without valves and at the exhaust, not at the inlet: I wonder if this old technique is used somehow in F-1 chamber design to help the ever faster valve system.

Image

Image

Imageç

Now, if we put this together with the six-stroke, piezoelectric injector, regenerating brakes and then, the laser spark-plug on a quasiturbine, we could .... :D
Ciro

manchild
manchild
12
Joined: 03 Jun 2005, 10:54

Post

I like 6 stroke idea a lot. Does anyone know what is the rotation ratio between cam and crankshaft at 6 stroke engine?

BTW, there is also another kind of 6 stroke engine :arrow: http://www.ducati.com/bikes/techcafe.jh ... rt=general

RH1300S
RH1300S
1
Joined: 06 Jun 2005, 15:29

Post

I love seeing this kind of stuff.

The steam engine is a very neat idea. I suppose you will never overheat this thing - when you run out of water the engine stops ;)

Another good lonk Manchild - that is a blindingly obvious solution. Could anyone say, would I be right in thinking that some of the limitations to higher revs be done away with. I.e. peak loads on the con-rod, 1st because there isn;t one :D second because you can control the accleration/decceleration 8)

User avatar
NickT
2
Joined: 24 Sep 2003, 12:47
Location: Edinburgh, UK

Post

Hey Ciro there is a Nick and a NickT, who have different view points.

Just in case you are in any doubt I am :twisted: NickT :twisted: sorry mate I couldn't resist an opportunity like that :lol:

Ok let’s look at the water issue. A ford focus has a 44 litre fuel tank so if we need 20% of this capacity for water for steam generation then that would be roughly 9 litres, but lets say 12 to give us a better margin. So thats a weight gain of 12 kilos plus the extra weight of the water tank, pump and plumbing :? so perhaps 20 kilos :D However this would be more than offset by loosing the water coolant - 6 kilos - plus the heavier radiator with all those cooling fins, the water pump and plumbing :shock: Not to mention the reduction in aero drag :wink:

Unfortunately we have a lot of theory but no real idea of the reality yet :cry: The potential is enormous 8) lower overall operating temperature, reduced thermal strain on valve train components, reduced emissions, increases in efficiency, not sure about power delivery yet (2 power strokes in every six, one big bang explosion and one hot steamy one :shock: ), increases in compression ratio because of the lower operating temperature and water injection during the conventional fuel/air intake stroke. Then there is the speed range of this engine, what is it :?: What happens as it moves through the rev range, will it have high outputs at higher revs like a petrol engine or will it have the higher torque output of a diesel at lower revs :?: perhaps it will give us the best of both worlds :?:

The best current production engine, in terms of a complete package with a broad power band, high torque, high power output, good economy and good emissions is the new VW unit that powers the Golf GT 1.4TSI :shock: That right its the world's first production supercharger-turbocharger hybrid system called Twincharger. For details check out http://www.autozine.org/technical_schoo ... wincharger Now let’s just think in terms of the fundamental design and innovation it has taken the motor industry to reach this panicle and how this compares to those engines that were being developed in the first half of the 20th century :?: .......


......


......


...... apart from the evolution of the control systems for delivering the fuel air mixture and the spark ignition, and the evolution of materials there is NOTHING fundamentally different or new :shock: its still the same ol' Otto cycle :mrgreen:

Now think about this fundamental development, the six stoke engine and its thermodynamics and how they compare to those of the best 4 stroke engine :? If you can get you head around this #-o then it gets interesting :wink: Now if I was the boss of a car company or an engine specialist I would be beating my way to this guy's door :D then I would beg, borrow or steal say 25% of an average F1 engine budget to invest in tasking someone like Ricardo to do some testing and development 8)

Ciro, you are absolutely right, we won’t see anything like this in F1 for some considerable time, but that doesn’t mean we should ignore it. Remember often the best designs :idea: in this world are the simplest and most elegant ones, the ones that seem to be so obvious when we look at them that we cannot believe they had not been thought about it sooner :wink:
NickT

User avatar
NickT
2
Joined: 24 Sep 2003, 12:47
Location: Edinburgh, UK

Post

Good one Manchild another very interasting engine 8) Not sure I would call it a six stroke though :shock: it looks like a variable phased 4 stroke to me :D

I think the rotation ratio of the first 6 stroke engine would be three to one. You are opening the inlet valve once in every three revolutions of the crank. Also the article talked about exhaust valve having a double cam profile to open and close the exhast valve twice in the last two revolutions :D
NickT

User avatar
joseff
11
Joined: 24 Sep 2002, 11:53

Post

The Motor Union 6-stroke seems to be sensible. Makes you wonder why people bother with variable valve timing in the first place. Bring it on!

NickT: IIRC there was a Toyota Corolla back in the 80's with supercharger and turbocharger.

User avatar
NickT
2
Joined: 24 Sep 2003, 12:47
Location: Edinburgh, UK

Post

there was a Toyota Corolla back in the 80's with supercharger and turbocharger
:shock: A mainstream production car :?:

I know of several earlier examples than the VW, but all were test or racing engines, the most noteable being the Lancia Delta Group B rally car. I would be very interested in learning more about the Toyota Corolla, can you post a link :?:
NickT

User avatar
Ciro Pabón
106
Joined: 11 May 2005, 00:31

Post

@NickT: I think you are confusing Ciro Pabon and Ciro Pabón... :)

Sorry, mates (Nick and NickT), never again.

I agree with your 4 cycle-observation on the 6-cycle engine MC posted. I spent 15 minutes trying to understand if the piston moved 4 or 6 times. It seems as if the article says that the TDC and BDC at ignition/combustion can be prolonged because you can make a flatter "cam" but I fail to see if this is an extra-stroke of the piston. Please, take me out of my misery: is NickT ok?

@Manchild: Thanks, man. You rules. I have to confess that much of the fun I find around here comes of your wonderful posts.
Last edited by Ciro Pabón on 03 May 2006, 15:28, edited 1 time in total.
Ciro

User avatar
NickT
2
Joined: 24 Sep 2003, 12:47
Location: Edinburgh, UK

Post

Ciro Pabón wrote:@NickT: I think you are confusing Ciro Pabon and Ciro Pabón... :)
Touché :roll:

Nice one Ciro Pabón :D
NickT

User avatar
Ciro Pabón
106
Joined: 11 May 2005, 00:31

Post

Lame joke of mine to try to compensate. Sorry, again.

Seriously: is MC a 4 or 6 stroke engine or what? As we say in Spain: "nor white, nor black but the complete opposite"?
Ciro

zac510
zac510
22
Joined: 24 Jan 2006, 12:58

Post

joseff wrote:NickT: IIRC there was a Toyota Corolla back in the 80's with supercharger and turbocharger.
You msut be thinking of the Nissan Micra.

The Corolla with the super and turbo was a supercharged Corolla with an aftermarket turbo kit.

User avatar
NickT
2
Joined: 24 Sep 2003, 12:47
Location: Edinburgh, UK

Post

Ciro Pabón wrote:I agree with your 4 cycle-observation on the 6-cycle engine MC posted. I spent 15 minutes trying to understand if the piston moved 4 or 6 times. It seems as if the article says that the TDC and BDC at ignition/combustion can be prolonged because you can make a flatter "cam" but I fail to see if this is an extra-stroke of the piston. Please, take me out of my misery: is NickT ok?
I am almost certain it is a four stoke, if you look closely

Their strokes 1 + 2 = Otto stroke 1
Their strokes 3 + 4 = Otto stroke 2
Their stroke 5 = Otto stroke 3
Their stroke 6 = Otto stroke 4

What makes it different is the ability the designer has to phase the timing and duration (volume) of each part of the stroke, rather like variable cam timing. Like RH1300S I am not sure what would happen at higher revs to the piston though, but I am sure they have some way of stopping it from floating.
NickT

User avatar
joseff
11
Joined: 24 Sep 2002, 11:53

Post

zac510: You're right, apparently it was a turbo kit for the 4AGZE supercharged Toyota engine.