Mercedes AMG F1 Team 2012

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
User avatar
Pierce89
60
Joined: 21 Oct 2009, 18:38

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Mr.S wrote:BTW Piece Massa has said Ferrari were in the doghouse & only since yesterday afternoon they have managed to get a decent direction regarding their car.

They have been unable to do more than 20-25 laps at a strech forget a race simulation. The Ferrari is rumoured to work on a "VERY SHORT WINDOW". I dont rule out Ferrari,they are Formula1's greatest team in history & can win the WDC any time.

But at present Mercedes should be slightly ahead of them atleast.
Yes Massa did say that, unfortunately though{for Merc) Mass and Alonso set times similar to the Merc even with a barely drivable car.
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970

“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher

Mr.S
Mr.S
0
Joined: 09 Apr 2011, 18:21

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

snoop1050 wrote:speed trap results courtesy of james allen
Mercedes 320.5
Toro Rosso 319.5
Caterham 318.5
Force India 317.5
Sauber 315.8
McLaren 314.9
Ferrari 311.2
Williams 311.2
Red Bull 310.3

fast in a straightline if nothing else but it might mean we lack downforce compared to the slower teams.

interestigly redbull is the slowest like last year and is likely to be much better in the corners than us
Brawn says W03 is very good in fast corners & MSC finds it consistent. Its traction & slower corners plus tyre degradation where they are lacking behind.

Anyways Red Bull I expected more,the size of their rear wing is pretty small unlike Mclaren who slap a gigantic Rear Wing at the expense of Straightline speed to get downforce.

Mercedes have no Flap or Monkey Seat or whatever that is over the rear wing like the other teams. I expected it to be very quick in a straightline. The car as a whole has improved & I hope it can challenge for wins in circuits like Montreal & Monza.
Last edited by Richard on 25 Feb 2012, 17:48, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Moved from Merc W03 thread

Mr.S
Mr.S
0
Joined: 09 Apr 2011, 18:21

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Ganxxta wrote:
snoop1050 wrote:speed trap results courtesy of james allen
Mercedes 320.5
Toro Rosso 319.5
Caterham 318.5
Force India 317.5
Sauber 315.8
McLaren 314.9
Ferrari 311.2
Williams 311.2
Red Bull 310.3

fast in a straightline if nothing else but it might mean we lack downforce compared to the slower teams.

interestigly redbull is the slowest like last year and is likely to be much better in the corners than us
DRS, Kers, slipstream, FW-FDuct, reduced RPMs by Redbull etc...
So again its only testing...
All those times are probably using KERS & DRS. Barcelona is not Monza or Montreal. 320km is pretty big speed & 311km aint that bad. If the gap between bottom & top is only 10km its not bad.

BTW Mercedes unlike RBR,Mclaren,Ferrai,Force India,Lotus do not have an extra element on top of their Rear Wing. No cheap way to increase downforce.
Last edited by Richard on 25 Feb 2012, 17:48, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Moved from Merc W03 thread !

munudeges
munudeges
-14
Joined: 10 Jun 2011, 17:08

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

Cocles wrote:Why not mention that Red Bull caught up in the middle of a season, because Brawn lacked the money and personel to develop the car at the same pace as their competitors?
Brawn had 100 million from Honda to get through the season. If money was a problem in 2009 they would been knocking on the door of every potential sponsor. They ended 2009 as the richest team on the grid, as per their own accounts.

On top of that they were winning races, had a big lead technically with the double diffuser and continuity with it into 2010.

The facts, as they stand, do not support the hyperbole of Brawn as a downtrodden poor team, as Ross Brawn himself has tried to paint a picture of.

User avatar
JohnsonsEvilTwin
0
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 11:51
Location: SU 419113

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 Team 2012

Post

You are ignoring the facts mun, as ever.

Brawn bought the team for a quid in december 08.
Honda had NO sponsorship(earth cars anyone?)
Honda's gift, wasn't so much a gift but a lifeline to ensure survival through 2009. you cannot pay bills with promises, 90 days and invoices need settling.
The team was given an advance for its 2009 championship winning year by Bernie. THIS is where you are confusing matters.

The books looked great,but that was due to the Money forwarded on by Bernie.To get a fair reflection of the teams financial status, you need to take the advance out. Any 12 year old knows this.

Indeed 44% of the team was cut, to ensure survival. Something Brawn admits was the hardest things hes ever had to do.

You continuously failed to see that a) the forwarded money by Bernie would influence the books.
And b)losing 44% of your capability along with tech know how from Japan will have an adverse affect on your team.

This topic has been discussed to the death already and still you are posting the same fallacies.
More could have been done.
David Purley

Leon
Leon
16
Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 21:58
Location: Armenia

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 Team 2012

Post

Interesting, wheter the Mercedes read this forum )))
"Clouds now and again
give a soul some respite from
moon-gazing-behold."

Matsuo Basho

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 Team 2012

Post

munudeges wrote:
Cocles wrote:Why not mention that Red Bull caught up in the middle of a season, because Brawn lacked the money and personel to develop the car at the same pace as their competitors?
Brawn had 100 million from Honda to get through the season. If money was a problem in 2009 they would been knocking on the door of every potential sponsor. They ended 2009 as the richest team on the grid, as per their own accounts.

On top of that they were winning races, had a big lead technically with the double diffuser and continuity with it into 2010.

The facts, as they stand, do not support the hyperbole of Brawn as a downtrodden poor team, as Ross Brawn himself has tried to paint a picture of.
JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:You are ignoring the facts mun, as ever.

Brawn bought the team for a quid in december 08.
Honda had NO sponsorship(earth cars anyone?)
Honda's gift, wasn't so much a gift but a lifeline to ensure survival through 2009. you cannot pay bills with promises, 90 days and invoices need settling.
The team was given an advance for its 2009 championship winning year by Bernie. THIS is where you are confusing matters.

The books looked great,but that was due to the Money forwarded on by Bernie.To get a fair reflection of the teams financial status, you need to take the advance out. Any 12 year old knows this.

Indeed 44% of the team was cut, to ensure survival. Something Brawn admits was the hardest things hes ever had to do.

You continuously failed to see that a) the forwarded money by Bernie would influence the books.
And b)losing 44% of your capability along with tech know how from Japan will have an adverse affect on your team.

This topic has been discussed to the death already and still you are posting the same fallacies.
JET is right, you are forgetting the fact that Brawn and 4 others ought the team for only £10 and a £35 UK administration fee to say to Companies House that they had bought Honda F1 Racing and were renaming the company Brawn GP.

Honda gifted the team a car that had the bult of a massive €440m investment into it, the last car developed outside the RRA to a point as it had 4 tunnels running on it.

Honda gave Brawn GP a €75m compansatory payment, and as the team was in effect a new entry they lost the €38.9m that Honda would have got from the 2008 seasons TV money and prize money as well. They had given Rubens a 6 GP deal as their origional plan was from Turkey was to run another driver from Brazil who was to bring €12m to the team. That driver was Bruno Senna. However they ditched their plans to run him as they got the investment from 3 sources; €10m from Virgin, €8.5m from MIG Bank and a small but important €3.5m deal from Henri Lloyd as well. They also had the €10m from Bridgestone. This gave the team a budget of arround €125m.

However, they had to cut the size of Brackley from 950 staff to 400, however they managed to make this 50 more jobs so they reduced to 450 staff to just before Monaco. Honda had already shut its Engine plant that was in Brackley, whitch has a futher 300 staff in it, arround 80 to 90 of those guys went back to Japan, the rest melted into either Mercedes High Performance Engines (as it was then) or went to Cosworth who were hiring again.

In 2009 the books just about ballanced as the team made an loss of just €400,000. However there was a massive ammount of budget lost to redundancy payouts, as under UK law, they needed to pay at minimum 12 weeks pay to those guys. Some, as they had been with the team since the Tyrell days had quite decent contracts, whitch on redundancy gave them an extra weeks pay on top of their 12 weeks statuatory for every year they worked for the company. There was a rumor of one guy walking away with 23 weeks on top of his 12 weeks redundancy.

The team survived, but if the team were to survive into 2010 they needed to trim staff futher, and also secure a decent sponsor budget, as they had lost the advance Bernie gave them.

Mercedes bought the team from Ross Brawn for a reported €75m, with every one of its board of directors walking away with arround €11.5m minimum.

Mercedes are pumping €150m into the team a year, and have a budget of €220m a year for its whole F1 activities. Mercedes AMG now has a reported budget of arround €320m a year, whitch is a bit on the high side for my liking, i think its closer to €275m as Petronas is only giving them €35m a year.

The team are also operating at more or less close to the RRA aggreement with 550 staff now, they only operate one tunnel that was last updated in 2008, and their CFD is decent as well, but not the best in F1. The plant in Brackley is operating at arround 70% of what its built to do, they have one set of out houses with nothing in them post Honda, last year there was rumor that Hispania was to take them over for a rent of €4m a year, as Hispania already use the Mercedes #2 tunnel they would have had a reduction on costs there for Hispania.

However nothing has came into those buildings as of yet.

Mercedes are running at what they call "optimum" factory performance now, they have everything streamlined and as compact as they can. They are only one of two teams that are running to the RRA to the letter of the law who are close to the limits of the RRA.

Money is still tight, but it isnt as tight as it once was for the team. the team has survived, they went lean to survive. Now they just need add a little performance into the fat they now have to play with. 2010 was a staging year, a rebuilding one, 2011 was a re-structuring one, 2012 could be a knolege re building one, with a couple of GP wins ideally. I think 2013 and 2014 will see Mercedes mixing it for championships. However that is if Ferrari, Sauber, Toro Rosso and Red Bull dont expand and go testing outside the RRA and FOTA this year, whitch is expected.

Mercedes have the resource and infrustructure, and i think the finance to win a Title, however they just need to be smart and evolve and re-define who and what the team is about. It took Newey, Horner and Marko from 2005 (Newey from 2006) till 2010 to win a title. It takes 5 years to make it to the front. Rome wasnt built in a day. However some of the board in Stutgart may get a little impatient, and the team needs to be a year ahead of 5 years this year.

Can they do it, yes.[/quote]
Last edited by ESPImperium on 26 Feb 2012, 00:26, edited 2 times in total.

Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 Team 2012

Post

This is the 2012 thread, no need to rake over 2009 - thank you!


ps - I'll leave the posts above by ESP, mun and JET as closing statements on thier views for posterity.

munudeges
munudeges
-14
Joined: 10 Jun 2011, 17:08

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 Team 2012

Post

< snipped very long post raking over the decomposing corpse of 2009 :evil: >

.

.

.

< I was nice enough to PM the original text back to mun before deleting. O:) >
Last edited by Richard on 25 Feb 2012, 23:29, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Warnings were given in public and PM

User avatar
Byronrhys
0
Joined: 09 Aug 2010, 03:14

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

I hope they get on top of this front tyre problem fast and don't let it trickle into the season and I PRAY we don't hear RB 3-4 races in saying the car is too long lol.

My worry now is that they don't seem ( I don't know, can anyone confirm) to have any other updates planned for Melbourne while others like RBR, Mcca, Lotus and FI probably still have performance to gain.

User avatar
pocketmoon
0
Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 23:14

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

marcush. wrote: basically Rosberg says they have tried everything possible at the track(Setup wise) to to make the tyres survive the distance but they were unable to impove that situation .
Not everything.

"We made many setup and mechanical changes but some things were no better"

marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

pocketmoon wrote:
marcush. wrote: basically Rosberg says they have tried everything possible at the track(Setup wise) to to make the tyres survive the distance but they were unable to impove that situation .
Not everything.

"We made many setup and mechanical changes but some things were no better"
out of context mate.
his words are: we wanted to improve front tyre degradation but found no solution....quite a bit of a difference.

At this time MERCEDES GP have a front tyre degradation issue ,at least on circuits with sustained gloads at high speeds.Add to that Brawn said RedBull has a traction advanatge ,or was it slow corner performance ,we can see whre they need to work.

Make it stiffer reducing roll and you kill the low speed performance improve low speed performance and your tyres will go away even quicker in the quicker parts...so the mechanical package has to improve.

Body roll: main body inclination in refernce to the track surface (viewing in direction of motion) .Body roll per se is not a bad thing ,but as it rolls you need to have more negative suspension travel (droop) or you will lift inside wheels =no grip on inside wheel .Giving up 25%of total grip is not a good idea to start with ...right?

User avatar
Pierce89
60
Joined: 21 Oct 2009, 18:38

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

marcush. wrote:
pocketmoon wrote:
marcush. wrote: basically Rosberg says they have tried everything possible at the track(Setup wise) to to make the tyres survive the distance but they were unable to impove that situation .
Not everything.

"We made many setup and mechanical changes but some things were no better"
out of context mate.
his words are: we wanted to improve front tyre degradation but found no solution....quite a bit of a difference.

At this time MERCEDES GP have a front tyre degradation issue ,at least on circuits with sustained gloads at high speeds.Add to that Brawn said RedBull has a traction advanatge ,or was it slow corner performance ,we can see whre they need to work.

Make it stiffer reducing roll and you kill the low speed performance improve low speed performance and your tyres will go away even quicker in the quicker parts...so the mechanical package has to improve.

Body roll: main body inclination in refernce to the track surface (viewing in direction of motion) .Body roll per se is not a bad thing ,but as it rolls you need to have more negative suspension travel (droop) or you will lift inside wheels =no grip on inside wheel .Giving up 25%of total grip is not a good idea to start with ...right?
Marcus, you should know that a soft front REDUCES lateral load tranfer. Remember the stiff Macca's pulling an inside front? An F1 car doesn't have enough roll to pull a front simply because it ran out of droop.
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970

“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher

User avatar
pocketmoon
0
Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 23:14

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

marcush. wrote:
pocketmoon wrote:
marcush. wrote: basically Rosberg says they have tried everything possible at the track(Setup wise) to to make the tyres survive the distance but they were unable to impove that situation .
Not everything.

"We made many setup and mechanical changes but some things were no better"
out of context mate.
his words are: we wanted to improve front tyre degradation but found no solution....quite a bit of a difference.
Sorry - where does the "tried everything possible" come from ? There's huge difference in the outcome for Mercedes if they really did try everything possible to improve front tyre degradation and failed. Rosberg simply didn't say that.

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
551
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W03

Post

edit.. mistake.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏