Red Bull RB11 Renault

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
GoranF1
GoranF1
155
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 12:53
Location: Zagreb,Croatia

Re: Red Bull RB11 Renault

Post

[tweet]https://twitter.com/?partner=opera15-other[/tweet]

this is what happens to me everytime!?
"I have no idols. I admire work, dedication & competence."

User avatar
Juzh
161
Joined: 06 Oct 2012, 08:45

Re: Red Bull RB11 Renault

Post

hitco? Wasn't original information carbon industrie? :?

3jawchuck
3jawchuck
37
Joined: 03 Feb 2015, 08:57

Re: Red Bull RB11 Renault

Post

ajnšpric_pumpa wrote:https://twitter.com/?partner=opera15-other

this is what happens to me everytime!?
Have you accidentally clicked "Disable BBCode" in post options?

astracrazy
astracrazy
31
Joined: 04 Mar 2009, 16:04

Re: Red Bull RB11 Renault

Post

What at the advantages and disadvantages of this? I'd guess a disadvantage would be that to make design adjustment they would have to re-make the whole thing....

User avatar
Mattchu
49
Joined: 07 Jul 2014, 19:37

Re: Red Bull RB11 Renault

Post

Probably the easiest way is on the actual tweet click the 3 dots (or more) the select "copy link to tweet" right click the highlighted link and copy then paste the result into the tweet /tweet BB code from above.

Try a few practises by doing the link but just hit "preview" instead of "Submit". Once you know you have it sorted you can go from there...
https://twitter.com/vickychandhok/statu ... 2195977216 Apologies if this is the wrong place for this, please delete if so...

User avatar
Morteza
2308
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 18:23
Location: Bushehr, Iran

Re: Red Bull RB11 Renault

Post

"A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool."~William Shakespeare

User avatar
jericho
2
Joined: 13 May 2014, 19:01

Re: Red Bull RB11 Renault

Post


GoranF1
GoranF1
155
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 12:53
Location: Zagreb,Croatia

Re: Red Bull RB11 Renault

Post

Mattchu wrote:Probably the easiest way is on the actual tweet click the 3 dots (or more) the select "copy link to tweet" right click the highlighted link and copy then paste the result into the tweet /tweet BB code from above.

Try a few practises by doing the link but just hit "preview" instead of "Submit". Once you know you have it sorted you can go from there...

https://twitter.com/vickychandhok/statu ... 2195977216

Apologies if this is the wrong place for this, please delete if so...
I understood the problem,you need to go direct to tweet source and then copy link...if i copy it on my timeline where someone retweet it or favorit it then link doesnt work here.
"I have no idols. I admire work, dedication & competence."

atlantis
atlantis
21
Joined: 24 Jan 2014, 14:33

Re: Red Bull RB11 Renault

Post

https://twitter.com/f1writers/status/586477479944187905 Kvyat's RB broken front wing / nosecone

User avatar
Thunder
Moderator
Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 09:50
Location: Germany

Re: Red Bull RB11 Renault

Post

Not following the RB too closely but is that Front Wing without the Hole in the Endplate new? (the bottom one)

Image
Image
turbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
#aerogollum

trinidefender
trinidefender
317
Joined: 19 Apr 2013, 20:37

Re: Red Bull RB11 Renault

Post

Thunders wrote:Not following the RB too closely but is that Front Wing without the Hole in the Endplate new? (the bottom one)

http://img3.auto-motor-und-sport.de/Red ... 856326.jpg
http://img2.auto-motor-und-sport.de/Red ... 856420.jpg
Yes it is. Totally new design actually. I can only really spot one or two similarities and those have to do with how the wing is constructed to reduce interference drag and skin friction drag.

f1rules
f1rules
577
Joined: 11 Jan 2004, 15:34
Location: Denmark

Re: Red Bull RB11 Renault

Post

yeah, most labelled it as just a new endplate, but its actually a new design that follows a bit merc and ferraris route, before the mainplaine curved at the end leading up to the endplate, now its curl, flat and then endplate

f1rules
f1rules
577
Joined: 11 Jan 2004, 15:34
Location: Denmark

Re: Red Bull RB11 Renault

Post

for comparison
Image

and mercs extreme solution
Image

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: Red Bull RB11 Renault

Post

Thunders wrote:Not following the RB too closely but is that Front Wing without the Hole in the Endplate new? (the bottom one)

http://img3.auto-motor-und-sport.de/Red ... 856326.jpg
http://img2.auto-motor-und-sport.de/Red ... 856420.jpg
That's a big change actually! Previously the wing elements stretched very close to the endplate, to the point that:
-The first element acted as support to the endplate
-The second, thirth and fourth element were place in the now absent endplate slots
-The fifth and sixth elements were integrated into the endplate

They have reduced all the elements a bit in length to seperate them from the endplate. Red Bull clearly are departing from the Peter Prodromou philosophy and converging towards the more mainstream front wing concepts.
#AeroFrodo

Advino116
Advino116
19
Joined: 04 Jul 2014, 13:32

Re: Red Bull RB11 Renault

Post

They are moving from an upwash design to an outwash design. I wouldn't be surprised if the cascades change to a Merc style soon. To me the change makes a lot of sense. An upwash design is fine back then when the front wings were the full width of the tyres, but since reduction in width last year, the flow off the end of the wing should see much higher blockage from the front tyres, which makes an outwash design a more logical design choice for me.

If you watched Scarbs latest video where he talks about Merc's newest front wing, he mentions the long lead times to design and make one, making me think this change wasn't a recent decision. It might be they revaluated their front wing philosophy after PP left and realised maybe Vettel's struggles with the car is partially contributed by the rear end ingesting dirty air off the front wheel wake which is insufficiently controlled by an upwash design. Else, I don't see a reason why they would totally switch philosophies if the upwash design is sufficient.