2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
fiohaa
fiohaa
8
Joined: 19 Apr 2012, 21:18

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

Fact: there is no way Vettel would have been able to sustain a continuous challenge on kimi, then ric, and then haul after verstappen, with the garbage tyres from the last 6 years.

durable tyres have absolutely transformed it back to real racing. Its like how it used to be. i can't believe i have my f1 back. Just think of the racing we missed out on for 6 years. unbelievable.

just need to sort the engines out in 2020 and it'll be perfect.

basti313
basti313
25
Joined: 22 Feb 2014, 14:49

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

iotar__ wrote:
09 Apr 2017, 15:34

- Vettel - out of position at the start, not a problem if you're driving Ferrari, Where is Charlie 'rules are rules' Whiting?
I thought you are one of the guys knowing the rules?
Don`t russel the hamster!

ENGINE TUNER
ENGINE TUNER
25
Joined: 29 Nov 2016, 18:07

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

basti313 wrote:
09 Apr 2017, 17:40
iotar__ wrote:
09 Apr 2017, 15:34

- Vettel - out of position at the start, not a problem if you're driving Ferrari, Where is Charlie 'rules are rules' Whiting?
I thought you are one of the guys knowing the rules?
What is the rule on that? how much(and which part) of the car must be in the start box?

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
551
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

According to Marko VES had a setup for rain and RIC more for the dry.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

ENGINE TUNER
ENGINE TUNER
25
Joined: 29 Nov 2016, 18:07

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

PlatinumZealot wrote:
09 Apr 2017, 18:47
According to Marko VES had a setup for rain and RIC more for the dry.
source?

f1316
f1316
79
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 18:36

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

fiohaa wrote:
09 Apr 2017, 16:28
Fact: there is no way Vettel would have been able to sustain a continuous challenge on kimi, then ric, and then haul after verstappen, with the garbage tyres from the last 6 years.

durable tyres have absolutely transformed it back to real racing. Its like how it used to be. i can't believe i have my f1 back. Just think of the racing we missed out on for 6 years. unbelievable.

just need to sort the engines out in 2020 and it'll be perfect.
Couldn't agree more! Couple of other little tweaks too but such a big step in the right direction this year.

ENGINE TUNER
ENGINE TUNER
25
Joined: 29 Nov 2016, 18:07

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

f1316 wrote:
09 Apr 2017, 19:01
fiohaa wrote:
09 Apr 2017, 16:28
Fact: there is no way Vettel would have been able to sustain a continuous challenge on kimi, then ric, and then haul after verstappen, with the garbage tyres from the last 6 years.

durable tyres have absolutely transformed it back to real racing. Its like how it used to be. i can't believe i have my f1 back. Just think of the racing we missed out on for 6 years. unbelievable.

just need to sort the engines out in 2020 and it'll be perfect.
Couldn't agree more! Couple of other little tweaks too but such a big step in the right direction this year.
Yes, the tires are much better this year, but they may still be a little too sensitive to overheating.

User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

I don't think it's overheating sensetivety, I think it's abrasion. The cars are more aero sensitive than ever, and the sliding around in someone else s wake is chewing them up!
197 104 103 7

ENGINE TUNER
ENGINE TUNER
25
Joined: 29 Nov 2016, 18:07

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

dans79 wrote:
09 Apr 2017, 19:37
I don't think it's overheating sensetivety, I think it's abrasion. The cars are more aero sensitive than ever, and the sliding around in someone else s wake is chewing them up!
Hasn't seemed like such a big problem for the ferrari so far, VET was able to spend many laps in both races closely behind and still keep them alive, maybe ferrari are running them in the lower portion of the temp range. IDK

HAM in OZ wasn't stuck behind anyone before pitting and still suffered tire overheating problems in the first stint. Or maybe it was just a bad set up.

User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

The Merc has a longer wheelbase so it will have a natural tendency to understeer, and chew up the fronts. Not to mention Vettel wasn't really pushing until he got past Kimi.
197 104 103 7

Vladimir
Vladimir
-1
Joined: 06 Nov 2016, 11:43

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

Giovinazzi Qual + Giovinazzi Race +VSC+SC = --- happens...... we missed real fight between Namilton and Sebastian.
Red Bull took advantage from messy race, even though they much slower than Ferrari.
Bad luck for Hulk, he became green for sure.

User avatar
AMG.Tzan
38
Joined: 24 Jan 2013, 01:35
Location: Greece

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

ENGINE TUNER wrote:
09 Apr 2017, 18:30
basti313 wrote:
09 Apr 2017, 17:40
iotar__ wrote:
09 Apr 2017, 15:34

- Vettel - out of position at the start, not a problem if you're driving Ferrari, Where is Charlie 'rules are rules' Whiting?
I thought you are one of the guys knowing the rules?
What is the rule on that? how much(and which part) of the car must be in the start box?
Yeah I was also surprised with that...because if you can park outside your box then you might have an advantage in wet conditions like today...essentially if your box has a wet patch you can avoid it and have a better start!
"The only rule is there are no rules" - Aristotle Onassis

User avatar
iotar__
7
Joined: 28 Sep 2012, 12:31

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

AMG.Tzan wrote:
09 Apr 2017, 21:39
ENGINE TUNER wrote:
09 Apr 2017, 18:30
basti313 wrote:
09 Apr 2017, 17:40

I thought you are one of the guys knowing the rules?
What is the rule on that? how much(and which part) of the car must be in the start box?
Yeah I was also surprised with that...because if you can park outside your box then you might have an advantage in wet conditions like today...essentially if your box has a wet patch you can avoid it and have a better start!
- Not only that - grip in the dry, line to the first corner, blocking drivers behind and so on. There's a reason for starting boxes.
- It's not like it was 10 cm sideways which should be penalised anyway but I'm guessing that was the lateral leniency rules expert above was talking about ;-) Not half of the damn car outside. BTW didn't it help to block Bottas later?
- Maldonado got five seconds for starting behind (BEHIND) his starting position, both position (some cars missing) and within his box. Guess how much he gained from that.

User avatar
Mr.G
34
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 22:52
Location: Slovakia

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

iotar__ wrote:
09 Apr 2017, 21:50
AMG.Tzan wrote:
09 Apr 2017, 21:39
ENGINE TUNER wrote:
09 Apr 2017, 18:30


What is the rule on that? how much(and which part) of the car must be in the start box?
Yeah I was also surprised with that...because if you can park outside your box then you might have an advantage in wet conditions like today...essentially if your box has a wet patch you can avoid it and have a better start!
- Not only that - grip in the dry, line to the first corner, blocking drivers behind and so on. There's a reason for starting boxes.
- It's not like it was 10 cm sideways which should be penalised anyway but I'm guessing that was the lateral leniency rules expert above was talking about ;-) Not half of the damn car outside. BTW didn't it help to block Bottas later?
- Maldonado got five seconds for starting behind (BEHIND) his starting position, both position (some cars missing) and within his box. Guess how much he gained from that.
Vettel know the book. Remember the overtake in pit entrance? He did it because he know... Also he used some trickery behind SC (I can remember, but it was something about some line or something)... He just know what he can do... or put it this way, he know what is not restricted...
Art without engineering is dreaming. Engineering without art is calculating. Steven K. Roberts

Restomaniac
Restomaniac
0
Joined: 16 May 2016, 01:09
Location: Hull

Re: 2017 Chinese Grand Prix - Shanghai 07-09 April

Post

My 7 year old son took one look at the starting positions and said 'Why is Seb all the way over there?' Followed by 'Is he allowed to be over there?'.
I said that I didn't think he was. The stewards decided that they would rather open a can of worms and let it go.