Red Bull RB20

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
AR3-GP
AR3-GP
335
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Red Bull RB20

Post

duplicate, delete
Last edited by AR3-GP on 15 Feb 2024, 19:14, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
vorticism
323
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20

Re: Red Bull RB20

Post

>strictly overhead lighting
>shadows entire inlet area

Are they trolling all of us?
𓄀

scheffers
scheffers
12
Joined: 22 Feb 2019, 10:37

Re: Red Bull RB20

Post

Look at the bulge flowing all the way from the Halo. =D>

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
335
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Red Bull RB20

Post

It's being reported that the intake is in fact vertical. I did not see that coming.

.poz
.poz
43
Joined: 08 Mar 2012, 16:44

Re: Red Bull RB20

Post

https://f1ingenerale.com/f1-leak-red-bu ... rb20-foto/

i have to link the web page because photo link is blocked

Farnborough
Farnborough
89
Joined: 18 Mar 2023, 14:15

Re: Red Bull RB20

Post

If you ring the most recent RB team published image through multiple contrast/exposure alterations, then it looks like the letter box intake is still in the same place and shape.
Just that the "trailing" edge of 19 underbite has been pushed up to top of intake form.

There's a continuous red stripe along tub wall, suggesting that the wall is flat. The outermost lower curved profile of pod coming up from floor area still seems to follow same as 19, and leading up to letter box location. Notably, the flow route to the radiator core location appears the same as before, maybe conforming to letterbox orientation, just tucked up underneath that, now overbite, lip that's been lifted to top of monocoque.


Perhaps the research as they raised the underbite lip, then the pressure drop into letter box drove an enquiry into that high pressure build site just under the 19 sidepod, the area that most teams can see, Ferrari responded to with S and Alpine are also chasing.
By flipping the under to over bite it makes valid route to accommodate both above and below pressure shift into one solution. In other words, not needing a separate "duct" to alleviate the high pressure site and have some extraneous "cooling" function to satisfy the rules.

If the radiator cores were to change to a higher airflow, now incoming at higher pressure too, then put realitively huge and low pressure restriction "cannon" outflow facility.....then the whole cooling duct works in bypass to external body flow...re-entering the vehicle outflow right under the rear wing.

This could also obviate using gills along mid part of top surfaces to increase flow at hot circuit more efficiently.

Henk_v
Henk_v
80
Joined: 24 Feb 2022, 13:41

Re: Red Bull RB20

Post

There are 2 options here;

-Team red Bull is rolling on the ground laughing because they purposely leaked pictures of a bullshit car the internet can dissect.

-Team red Bull is rolling on the ground laughing because they will kick MB ass in a '22 MB, while MB is driving a '24 RB..

Any way you slice it they are having fun

venkyhere
venkyhere
3
Joined: 10 Feb 2024, 06:17

Re: Red Bull RB20

Post

Is this 'brightened pic' with a vertical cooling intake, a real image or an edit-joke by someone ?

Owen.C93
Owen.C93
171
Joined: 24 Jul 2010, 17:52

Re: Red Bull RB20

Post

Looks more Alpine than Merc inlet anyway. Slot to capture the boundary layer and a bit more open at the top.
Motorsport Graduate in search of team experience ;)

User avatar
FW17
168
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: Red Bull RB20

Post

venkyhere wrote:
15 Feb 2024, 19:22
Is this 'brightened pic' with a vertical cooling intake, a real image or an edit-joke by someone ?

No there seems to be a vertical dark slit when you brighten the picture

User avatar
vorticism
323
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20

Re: Red Bull RB20

Post

Farnborough wrote:
15 Feb 2024, 19:19
Perhaps the research as they raised the underbite lip, then the pressure drop into letter box drove an enquiry into that high pressure build site just under the 19 sidepod, the area that most teams can see, Ferrari responded to with S and Alpine are also chasing.
By flipping the under to over bite it makes valid route to accommodate both above and below pressure shift into one solution. In other words, not needing a separate "duct" to alleviate the high pressure site and have some extraneous "cooling" function to satisfy the rules.

If the radiator cores were to change to a higher airflow, now incoming at higher pressure too, then put realitively huge and low pressure restriction "cannon" outflow facility.....then the whole cooling duct works in bypass to external body flow...re-entering the vehicle outflow right under the rear wing.

This could also obviate using gills along mid part of top surfaces to increase flow at hot circuit more efficiently.
Interesting idea. With purposely large sidepods in this aero formula you might consider it. Further:

Main radiator tub and fin dimensions are regulated (to what degree I can't recall)
Microtube type rads are effectively ruled out for the main rads iirc
𓄀

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
335
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Red Bull RB20

Post

venkyhere wrote:
15 Feb 2024, 19:22
Is this 'brightened pic' with a vertical cooling intake, a real image or an edit-joke by someone ?
What hasn't been ruled out is an S-duct inlet (like Ferrari), in addition to their tradition horizontal opening under the roof of the sidepod.

.poz
.poz
43
Joined: 08 Mar 2012, 16:44

Re: Red Bull RB20

Post

Image
Image

it doesn't look the same inlet

User avatar
ing.
50
Joined: 15 Mar 2021, 20:00

Re: Red Bull RB20

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
15 Feb 2024, 19:16
It's being reported that the intake is in fact vertical. I did not see that coming.
You read here first (if true, LOL):

viewtopic.php?p=1184702#p1184702

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
335
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Red Bull RB20

Post

Ferrari had open and closed S-duct options when they tested at the beginning of 2023.