Flexible wings controversy 2010

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
User avatar
strad
117
Joined: 02 Jan 2010, 01:57

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

:roll:
To achieve anything, you must be prepared to dabble on the boundary of disaster.”
Sir Stirling Moss

xpensive
xpensive
214
Joined: 22 Nov 2008, 18:06
Location: Somewhere in Scandinavia

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

strad wrote::roll:
Oh come on strad, this frequency-theory is just as plausible as Adrian Newey doing an Uri Geller, no?
"I spent most of my money on wine and women...I wasted the rest"

User avatar
strad
117
Joined: 02 Jan 2010, 01:57

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

hahahahahaha
To achieve anything, you must be prepared to dabble on the boundary of disaster.”
Sir Stirling Moss

User avatar
SiLo
134
Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 19:09

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

Yeah please stop wasting your time thinking about frequencies, its just not plausible. The most likely thing is the layering of the carbon fibre, and possible a bending nose too.
Felipe Baby!

nlacosta93
nlacosta93
0
Joined: 15 Aug 2010, 19:35

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

I understand that the test for the wings have now been altered to that a 100 kg weight will be placed onto the front wing and be allowed 20 mm of deflection compared to the previous 50 kg and 10 mm of deflection.

User avatar
747heavy
24
Joined: 06 Jul 2010, 21:45

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

a video (with slow mos) about the Red Bull wing flexing can be seen here:
Nothing new, but some may like to have a look.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkMQt-Ig ... re=related

and some sci-fi stuff for the open minded or conspiration theorists :wink:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RU78lAJR ... re=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PWdfpwk ... re=related

non-newtonian fluid in frequency response,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zoTKXXN ... 1&index=25
"Make the suspension adjustable and they will adjust it wrong ......
look what they can do to a carburetor in just a few moments of stupidity with a screwdriver."
- Colin Chapman

“Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.” - Leonardo da Vinci

User avatar
mep
29
Joined: 11 Oct 2003, 15:48
Location: Germany

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zoTKXXN ... 1&index=25[/youtube]
Thats really nice thanks for sharing.
Seems like its eaven very easy to do yourself. Just cornstarch and water.

Something to put into a damper. :D
Or maybe better not I guess it would rise the forces to infinite.
How about the oposite?
Fluids that get liquid when force is applied or shear viskos fluids.

wrcsti
wrcsti
0
Joined: 06 Apr 2009, 04:46

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

mep wrote:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zoTKXXN ... 1&index=25[/youtube]
Thats really nice thanks for sharing.
Seems like its eaven very easy to do yourself. Just cornstarch and water.

Something to put into a damper. :D
Or maybe better not I guess it would rise the forces to infinite.
How about the oposite?
Fluids that get liquid when force is applied or shear viskos fluids.
Image
ITS ALIVE!!!!!

User avatar
Afterburner
1
Joined: 23 Feb 2009, 16:24

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

It's weird Ferrari got it's front wing "working" when they adapted a 3 element front wing like red bull, i think flexing it's more related to the 3 elements than the frequency thing.

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
591
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

McLaren have the same style of split main plane outer section as the Red Bull and Ferrari (and have had all season) so this aspect of the front wing isn't issue.

Looking at the design of the interface of the outer portion to the central main plane shows that the McLaren is much chunkier than the RB and it's the method of linking these sections that is almost certainly the key to flexibility.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

User avatar
Afterburner
1
Joined: 23 Feb 2009, 16:24

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

I'm not saying the wing flex due the 3 elements but i bet flexing and 3 elements are connected, some sort of aero mechanism.

avatar
avatar
3
Joined: 13 Mar 2009, 22:01

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

RE: vibrating wing

I don't think anyone's running it (can't see anyone getting something based on turning vibration to their advantage, right without some failures on track).

Harmonic resonance is just a possible tool for inducing a (harmonic) vibration at 1 frequency in part of the chassis from another frequency already present in the system. Vibrations aren't really Sci fi. The resonance won't magically melt the wing (which I get the feeling is what Strad thought I meant).

The 2 effects as I saw it that could be used are:

> Low frequency/long wavelength vibration (less feasible imho)
- the wing would effectively be trying to "flap" as the wave travels along it
- on the "downstroke" (for the want of a better word), a additional force would be applied in the same direction as the pressure above the wing.
- the force of the aero would dampen the upstroke. (+ rob the energy from the vibration, preventing any sustained "true" resonance & likely making the energy demand higher than what's available)
- my thought was that there is potential here to use the additional downward pressure to actuate a "cranking" mechanism(?) in [the structure of] the wing.

> High frequency vibration
- stiffening effect (can be induced deformation - vibration applied drawing the structure into a different shape, stiffening it against variation from that shape)
- effectively this could enable vibration to induce a curve in the wing, or conversely (with different structure)stiffen a flat wing.
- someone's always already written a paper on just about any idea (or in this case a similar application of the effect): adaptive tuned vibration absorber with variable shape stiffness element

- I don't have a clue what the direct effect of high frequency oscillation would be on aero performance.... Could be bad, could be good.

User avatar
SiLo
134
Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 19:09

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

And what happens when it resonates at it's natural frequency? Which there is a very high chance of happening because of the large variations in vibrations. The thing would explode/fall apart because the carbon fibre makes it relatively brittle.
Felipe Baby!

Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

Well well well - Who said there is no relationship between F1 and road cars ...
wiki page on the Ferrari 458 wrote:the front grille features deformable winglets that lower at high speeds, in order to offer reduced drag.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrari_458_Italia#Design
*tongue in cheek*

User avatar
forty-two
0
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 21:07

Re: Flexible wings controversy 2010

Post

SiLo wrote:And what happens when it resonates at it's natural frequency? Which there is a very high chance of happening because of the large variations in vibrations. The thing would explode/fall apart because the carbon fibre makes it relatively brittle.
And a suitably skilled design engineer would build in a damping mechanism (which might LOOK like a support strut of course!) to counter this very problem. If they really worked at this, the damping mechanism could even be the very same part which actually enables the flexing of the wing to it's lower position.
The answer to the ultimate question, of life, the Universe and ... Everything?