F1technical.net

I love the way you keep proving my points Chris.
Rage?
Not with that picture shirley.

For the record, I am from the US. Unfortunately I am not retarded. At least not completely. I will agree that the US is going down the shitter. However, I am not willing to let that happen. For now, at least until I am 36, I'll focus on school and inventing ---. Eventually, we'll see where I go.

As for my invention. I had two engineers, one mechanical and one electrical, look over my idea. I worked out all the aforementioned issues with it. I have a method to engage gears. Figured out vibration dampening issues. I need to talk to a material engineer and I'm going to next week. I love havig access to the best engineers in a heavy industry market. Also, the written part of my patent is done, not including autocad drawing. I have a super simple model made. I need to improve that tho and make it three dimensional. Currently I have flattened sections. Unfortunately the kitty tail driveshaft idea fell thru, so I'm stuck using metal. It's a shame. Also, I was going to make a case using woven cat hair. Also fell thru.

Chris. Your pictures are heinous and uncalled for. Wtf were you thinking?!?! Also, please post more. They are humorous.

autogyro wrote:

allstaruk08 wrote:autogyro sounds like one of them inventors that go on dragon den saying how amazingly awesome they design is, how its better than everything else out there just for the dragons to tell them its crap but he doesnt believe what they are saying. Dont waste your life with this, sounds like you arn't mega rich from it if your ideas really were amazing you wouldn't be on here trying to convince us how good it is.

I have no interest in whether you or anyone else believes me.
I have no intention of convincing any of you of anything thanks.
That is a concept of complete irrelevance.
If you do not like it, then why act like a know it all nobody and bother to post.
Like I said before, I have dealt with people much more important in the scheme of things than you, that is obvious from your puerile contributions.

you clearly do care or you wouldn't keep posting trying to prove your gearbox would work (if it did work im sure it would be in use now). How am i acting like the know it all nobody your the person with the super amazing gearbox and all those stolen ideas and still posting on here telling people about it, sounds to me like your the know it all nobody.

MinacciolMotors wrote:Chris. Your pictures are heinous and uncalled for. Wtf were you thinking?!?! Also, please post more. They are humorous.

Indeed they are, I have made the decision that autogyro's posts aren't of sufficient quality or humourous enough to dignify them with a real response.

allstaruk08 wrote: you clearly do care or you wouldn't keep posting trying to prove your gearbox would work (if it did work im sure it would be in use now). How am i acting like the know it all nobody your the person with the super amazing gearbox and all those stolen ideas and still posting on here telling people about it, sounds to me like your the know it all nobody.

Don't rise to the bait bud.

So many posts with so much sensible content. Hahaha
Another poor image peeerlease.
When the brain goes blank the engineer turns to semantics every time.
I know one engineer who believes engineering must also encourage art.
He is right but few have the capability or the wider education required.
Keep trying Chris.

allstaruk08 wrote:

autogyro wrote:

allstaruk08 wrote:autogyro sounds like one of them inventors that go on dragon den saying how amazingly awesome they design is, how its better than everything else out there just for the dragons to tell them its crap but he doesnt believe what they are saying. Dont waste your life with this, sounds like you arn't mega rich from it if your ideas really were amazing you wouldn't be on here trying to convince us how good it is.

I have no interest in whether you or anyone else believes me.
I have no intention of convincing any of you of anything thanks.
That is a concept of complete irrelevance.
If you do not like it, then why act like a know it all nobody and bother to post.
Like I said before, I have dealt with people much more important in the scheme of things than you, that is obvious from your puerile contributions.

you clearly do care or you wouldn't keep posting trying to prove your gearbox would work (if it did work im sure it would be in use now). How am i acting like the know it all nobody your the person with the super amazing gearbox and all those stolen ideas and still posting on here telling people about it, sounds to me like your the know it all nobody.

So what?
Have you a reason why I should not post, or is there something else you are worried about?

autogyro wrote:So many posts with so much sensible content. Hahaha
Another poor image peeerlease.
When the brain goes blank the engineer turns to semantics every time.
I know one engineer who believes engineering must also encourage art.
He is right but few have the capability or the wider education required.
Keep trying Chris.

Trying what?

xxChrisxx wrote:

autogyro wrote:So many posts with so much sensible content. Hahaha
Another poor image peeerlease.
When the brain goes blank the engineer turns to semantics every time.
I know one engineer who believes engineering must also encourage art.
He is right but few have the capability or the wider education required.
Keep trying Chris.

Trying what?

I thought you were 'trying' to redirect the thread into an art appreciation debate.
Like I said. Keep trying.

autogyro wrote:I thought you were 'trying' to redirect the thread into an art appreciation debate.
Like I said. Keep trying.

No art here.
Only fact.

And of course humerous image macros.

xxChrisxx wrote:

autogyro wrote:I thought you were 'trying' to redirect the thread into an art appreciation debate.
Like I said. Keep trying.

No art here.
Only fact.

Oh no, not an 'art/fact' debate. I find most engineers far to narrow minded for such deep thought, especially the religious aspects.
You should read more Dawkins, it will sooth your mind.
Nothing like a world made from scientific fact.
I shall not even tell you that facts are not truth, or art, which can be both or all three, you might explode.
Do you wait keyboard at the ready for my posts?
Just send money.

Yes... yes I do.

and I don't read Dawkins. Dr Seuss is more to my liking. Many truths to be had from the Cat in the Hat.

No post away! im not worried about anything but anyone can say they made something and then not back it up. Infact last week i made a 2.4 V8 its kicking out about 900BHP and it uses about the same amount of fuel as the current F1 engines. See how easy it is to talk --- on here lol if your going big something up the you gotta back up what your saying.

xxChrisxx wrote:Yes... yes I do.

and I don't read Dawkins. Dr Seuss is more to my liking. Many truths to be had from the Cat in the Hat.

Very true but no strait lines! Fact.

allstaruk08 wrote:No post away! im not worried about anything but anyone can say they made something and then not back it up. Infact last week i made a 2.4 V8 its kicking out about 900BHP and it uses about the same amount of fuel as the current F1 engines. See how easy it is to talk --- on here lol if your going big something up the you gotta back up what your saying.

You are completely missing the point.
I have not said I have made anything.