It would be excellent! And as you are using the ‘engine’ to purely generate electricity it could be run at its most efficient rpm.
at the trivial power of F1 a free-piston engine/linear generator would be (much) more efficient
if kept generator-only it wouldn't need to limit the cycle rate so wouldn't sound like a big-block V8
Re: Pulse-jet MGU-H
Posted: 14 Feb 2021, 23:10
by Greg Locock
Strictly speaking the photo in the first post isn't a pulse jet either.
Re: Pulse-jet MGU-H
Posted: 22 Feb 2021, 02:48
by Zynerji
Whatevs.
Running 2 of these in a car with twin MGUH could be bad a55.
Running 2 of these in a car with twin MGUH could be bad a55.
I had speculated earlier that if they didn't have the 100kg fuel limit, (still keep flow limit of 100kg/h) they might run a little extra fuel, to dump into the exhaust when off throttle. Using an antilag system to keep the MGU-H spinning.
Running mini-jet engines to drive the MGU-H would not be a great idea I think. I don't think jet engines sound particularly good, its just a bunch of very loud white noise.
Running 2 of these in a car with twin MGUH could be bad a55.
I had speculated earlier that if they didn't have the 100kg fuel limit, (still keep flow limit of 100kg/h) they might run a little extra fuel, to dump into the exhaust when off throttle. Using an antilag system to keep the MGU-H spinning.
Running mini-jet engines to drive the MGU-H would not be a great idea I think. I don't think jet engines sound particularly good, its just a bunch of very loud white noise.
...but electric torque and THRUST!
Re: Pulse-jet MGU-H
Posted: 22 Feb 2021, 14:58
by Big Tea
Dont know if this fits in the engine or aero section,but it is propulsion, so i put it here
Dont know if it could be adapted to assist an F1 car?