pnumatic valve system on cars??

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
0

Post Wed Jun 17, 2009 8:49 pm

do they use this instead of springs on road cars? or is it down to relibilty. I mean an evo fq400 packs 400bhp from 2.0 turbocharged engine, if they have pneumatic valves could that be doubled? they have performace parts by HKS. do formula one engines use HKS parts?

sorry about the spelling.
adam2007
0
 
Joined: 30 Mar 2009

0

Post Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:38 pm

The horsepower to drive the valve-train will be independent from the the engine horsepower for the most part, So the pnuematic valve springs will only free up a maximum amount of power. Not that much!

I hear that pneumatics valve springs are very leaky. I imagine you need air tight seals and those seals would have a high sliding velocity, so that is complicates things.

There might be other systems required to run them.. I would like to hear the other details though.
"I was blessed with the ability to understand how cars move," he explains. "You know how in 'The Matrix,' he can see the matrix? When I'm driving, I see the lines."
n smikle
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 12 Jun 2008

0

Post Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:41 pm

F1 cars use pnumatic valves because at about 12,000 - 13,000rpm ( i think!! ) spring values become useless because they can not move quick enough. I think thats the reason anyway!
PNSD
3
 
Joined: 3 Apr 2006

0

Post Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:35 pm

PNSD wrote:F1 cars use pnumatic valves because at about 12,000 - 13,000rpm ( i think!! ) spring values become useless because they can not move quick enough. I think thats the reason anyway!


exactly! pneumatic valves allow the engines to rev as high as they do, thus greatly increasing the hp.
ISLAMATRON
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 1 Oct 2008

0

Post Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:42 pm

PNSD wrote:F1 cars use pnumatic valves because at about 12,000 - 13,000rpm ( i think!! ) spring values become useless because they can not move quick enough. I think thats the reason anyway!


It has to be a bit higher than that as my motorbike revs to 15.5k revs and uses steel springs in a double coil arrangement.

The problem is that you get valve float where it basically does not know whether it is coming or going.

There are no road cars able to rev anywhere near high enough to need pneumatic valves.

The Honda S2000 is a high revving motor - over 9000 revs I think..
IMPERATOR REX ANGLORUM
CMSMJ1
3
 
Joined: 25 Sep 2007
Location: Sheffield, United Kingdom

0

Post Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:03 am

rotaries rev higher, but we have no use for springs :wink:
ISLAMATRON
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 1 Oct 2008

0

Post Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:09 am

brap brap brap...

high revving 13B... beware of flying apex seals!!!
majicmeow
1
 
Joined: 5 Feb 2008

0

Post Thu Jun 18, 2009 2:18 am

Any one has any images or details of the pneumatic system?
For Sure!!
ringo
44
User avatar
 
Joined: 29 Mar 2009

0

Post Thu Jun 18, 2009 2:28 am

Google F1 pneumatic valves?

Nope... cuz the first link you get is from Scarbs, one of the residents here. :)


http://scarbsf1.com/valves.html
Before I do anything I ask myself “Would an idiot do that?” And if the answer is yes, I do not do that thing. - Dwight Schrute
Giblet
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 19 Mar 2007
Location: Downtown Canada

0

Post Thu Jun 18, 2009 2:54 am

Good stuff.
I'll go implement it on my briggs/stratton lawn mower now. 22k revs :twisted: :lol:
For Sure!!
ringo
44
User avatar
 
Joined: 29 Mar 2009

0

Post Thu Jun 18, 2009 10:33 am

Have F1 engines ever used desmodromics like Ducati engines use? I'd be quite interested to see whether they do because over in Motogp Ducati win the power race hands down, and I believe the concensus is it is because of the desmo system (using even less power than pnuematic valves?).
gibells
1
 
Joined: 8 Apr 2009
Location: Andalucia, Spain

0

Post Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:15 pm

Desmo isn't all gain's their are some disadvantages, cost and reliability spring (cough) to mind.
The faster the engine is going to rev the stronger the valve spring tension needs to be, as mentioned before about float, it's when the spring isn't strong enough to push the valve back down fast enough before the next stroke, having just consulted Wikipedia I can also add that springs, when of constant thickness and coil spacing have harmonic issues at certain speed ranges, hence the use of multiple or progressive springs on more modern motors to give a damping effect.

Desmo pushes the valves open and pulls them closed again doing away with a spring all together, and I BELIEVE frees up slightly more power at lower RPM where the springs have to be very oversprung in order to function correctly at high speed, however it needs to power the valve into the closed as well as open positions so at certain points will be less efficient, or as the lads on the eng-tips forum put it:

"Conventional valvetrain power requirements are proportional to speed (friction dominant), whereas desmo requirements are purely inertial. So there is a crossover point"

Could never formulate that sentence on my own...
http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm? ... 426&page=4

Meaning a valve spring is as good if not better than Desmo at high speed, then there is another crossover when you reach the limits of the metal of the spring, to pneumatic.
safeaschuck
2
User avatar
 
Joined: 23 Oct 2008

0

Post Thu Jun 18, 2009 2:23 pm

Did Renault ever roll out their Solenoid valves onto the F1 cars, or was that a stillbirth project?
kilcoo316
28
 
Joined: 9 Mar 2005
Location: Kilcoo, Ireland


Return to General chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Florio and 8 guests