BMW Sauber F1.09

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter does not belong here.
raceman
-1
User avatar
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 7:57 am
Location: Pune, India

Re: BMW Sauber F1.09

Postby raceman » Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:13 am

wrcsti wrote:The drivers arse?



:lol:

where's the driver but?? :wtf:

kNt
0
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:32 pm

Re: BMW Sauber F1.09

Postby kNt » Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:38 am

Maybe they put the Engine ECU there.

scarbs
296
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 8:47 am
Location: Hertfordshire, UK

Re: BMW Sauber F1.09

Postby scarbs » Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:55 am

Yes many teams mount the triangular SECU in the section beneath the drivers legs. this is why the SECU is triangular, as Mac had it designed that way (pre SECU)to be mounted there.

BreezyRacer
2
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:31 pm

Re: BMW Sauber F1.09

Postby BreezyRacer » Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:19 pm

ISLAMATRON wrote:Image


Am I the only guy that wants to walk up to this car with a jigsaw and cut the damn top off of those STUPID front end plates??? Do they not realize that any pressure buildup in their precious box creates lift on that upper surface? This is one case where ugly is as ugly does!

PNSD
4
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 5:10 pm

Re: BMW Sauber F1.09

Postby PNSD » Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:21 pm

I thought the flat plate on top induced downforce because of the rotating tyre?

BreezyRacer
2
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:31 pm

Re: BMW Sauber F1.09

Postby BreezyRacer » Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:35 pm

PNSD wrote:I thought the flat plate on top induced downforce because of the rotating tyre?


http://images.gpupdate.net/large/117215.jpg

Look at this pic and you'll see that it's nowhere near the tire. If they are letting the tire determine airflow patterns onto the wing area they have it ALL WRONG. Still, I would LOVE to hear the reasoning behind this most successful aero design .. :P

PNSD
4
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 5:10 pm

Re: BMW Sauber F1.09

Postby PNSD » Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:54 pm

Me too, it just looks all wrong compared to the rest.

This is the reason for my previous post:

http://www.f1-forecast.com/pdf/CRANFIEL ... 20WING.pdf

PlatinumZealot
130
User avatar
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:45 am

Re: BMW Sauber F1.09

Postby PlatinumZealot » Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:07 pm

Well suppose there is no pressure build up in between those plates. The back wall looks like it ramps outward really smoothly.
The main function of the endplates might just be an air flow guide.
Maybe the pressure under the endplate is what it depends on to make down force....?? Or maybe all they depend on, is the middle of the wing.

Just some guesses..
"I appreciate artistry, I appreciate technique, I appreciate strategy, tactics," TDG said. "When I look at him and watch him race, no matter who it is, I see how he breaks down his opponent."

BreezyRacer
2
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:31 pm

Re: BMW Sauber F1.09

Postby BreezyRacer » Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:33 pm

n smikle wrote:Well suppose there is no pressure build up in between those plates. The back wall looks like it ramps outward really smoothly.
The main function of the endplates might just be an air flow guide.
Maybe the pressure under the endplate is what it depends on to make down force....?? Or maybe all they depend on, is the middle of the wing.

Just some guesses..


There definitely is positive pressure buildup in that box, and when that occurs it spreads that positive pressure to surrounding surfaces, thus creating lift on the underside of the top plate.

As they say aero starts at the front of the car. If the front is wrong, nothing else will fix it.

timbo
82
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:14 am

Re: BMW Sauber F1.09

Postby timbo » Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:05 pm

BreezyRacer wrote:There definitely is positive pressure buildup in that box, and when that occurs it spreads that positive pressure to surrounding surfaces, thus creating lift on the underside of the top plate.

And negative lift at the bottom plate. What's the problem?

BreezyRacer
2
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:31 pm

Re: BMW Sauber F1.09

Postby BreezyRacer » Wed Sep 09, 2009 3:25 pm

timbo wrote:
BreezyRacer wrote:There definitely is positive pressure buildup in that box, and when that occurs it spreads that positive pressure to surrounding surfaces, thus creating lift on the underside of the top plate.

And negative lift at the bottom plate. What's the problem?


Everyone else figured out long ago to keep the good (the lower sill plate in this case) and ditch the part that hurts. I propose that to be the upper plate. Have you even seen them test anything other than this box? Yes, they've had variations but always with the box. If nothing else just put a hole in the box top and see if that helps. But they really should try SOMETHING. Last year they were on the verge of breaking thru and this year they are getting ready to withdraw from the series. This entire season the car has been a struggle. Look at the rest of the grid. Nobody else has even tested the stupid box idea, yet this team cling to it as if it were their secret weapon. On the face of it, it shouldn't work, and I think we can fairly say it ain't helping matters any.

PNSD
4
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 5:10 pm

Re: BMW Sauber F1.09

Postby PNSD » Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:05 pm

Didnt Honda test with it in pre-season?

astracrazy
47
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:04 pm

Re: BMW Sauber F1.09

Postby astracrazy » Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:53 pm

Image

Is that rear wing adjustable? Brawn style from spa? can't see properly

Scotracer
2
User avatar
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:09 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

Re: BMW Sauber F1.09

Postby Scotracer » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:14 pm

Here's the full Monza trim:

Image
Powertrain Cooling Engineer

PNSD
4
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 5:10 pm

Re: BMW Sauber F1.09

Postby PNSD » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:20 pm

god that car is ugly




Return to “F1 Car Hardware & Development”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests