Mercedes Power cars are dominating

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.

Post Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:14 am

The Benz power cars are really fast! So fast that even the low budget Force India is able to make great impression on track and be faster than Ferrari.

I speculate that the 18000RPM rev limit made a significant difference in the way all the engines performed. Renault, Ferrari, Toyota just don't have the grunt at the slightly low rev compared to the Merc.

Impressive, I bet there will be protest later on... hehehe..

I wonder if the other engines can find a way around this?
jamsbong
 
Joined: 13 May 2007

Post Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:24 am

jamsbong wrote:The Benz power cars are really fast! So fast that even the low budget Force India is able to make great impression on track and be faster than Ferrari.

I speculate that the 18000RPM rev limit made a significant difference in the way all the engines performed. Renault, Ferrari, Toyota just don't have the grunt at the slightly low rev compared to the Merc.

Impressive, I bet there will be protest later on... hehehe..

I wonder if the other engines can find a way around this?


FI's pace is not from engine.
Grip is a four letter word.

2 is the new #1.
Jersey Tom
 
Joined: 29 May 2006
Location: Huntersville, NC

Post Mon Sep 14, 2009 4:38 am

Some of it is, but not merely about the power the engine is producing but the fact that is has lower cooling requirements and thus less of an aero penalty.
Super racing
 
Joined: 7 Sep 2009

Post Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:07 am

I don't think cooling is the major difference between the areodynamics now though.. The radiators are pretty huge.. slanted sidways even.. On the hot tracks I notice they didn't even open up the side pod holes any bigger and on the cool tracks they didn't make them smaller. I have only seen them open up the back parts of the engine cover. So i say the difference in cooling requirements amongst the engines but not significant enough to cause a wide variation in the side pod shape.

It must be something else about the engine...
"I was blessed with the ability to understand how cars move," he explains. "You know how in 'The Matrix,' he can see the matrix? When I'm driving, I see the lines."
n smikle
 
Joined: 12 Jun 2008

Post Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:36 am

Apart from reported to be more powerful than the others, what is really interesting is if the Mercedes-engine requires less cooling, which the smaller air-intakes of the cars suggests.

What does it mean, is the Mercedes engine more fuel efficient or is it spewing out more energy through the exhaust then the others? If it's in the cooling system itself, they would probably not give that technology away to the customer teams, would they?
"Bernoulli is a nine-letter name"
xpensive
 
Joined: 22 Nov 2008

Post Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:06 am

Maybe engine and auxillarities are spec'd to work at higher temperatures?
timbo
 
Joined: 22 Oct 2007

Post Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:28 am

Perhaps that is the most plausible xplanation timbo, Mercedes engine running hotter, that way making the cooling system more efficient?
"Bernoulli is a nine-letter name"
xpensive
 
Joined: 22 Nov 2008

Post Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:45 am

xpensive wrote:Mercedes engine running hotter, that way making the cooling system more efficient?

Hmm, depends on how you define efficient))
But if they manage to run engine hotter they certainly would need much less flow thru radiators. That thermal insulation they have around engine can be a hint on this (or not :) ).
timbo
 
Joined: 22 Oct 2007

Post Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:51 am

Isn't convection of energy between radiators and the passing air-stream proportional to difference in temperature?
"Bernoulli is a nine-letter name"
xpensive
 
Joined: 22 Nov 2008

Post Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:09 am

xpensive wrote:Isn't convection of energy between radiators and the passing air-stream proportional to difference in temperature?

Well, of course. I learned that lesson hard when tried to cool thermostat tank without forced cooling (5 liters) from 25oC to below 20oC. It was a looong wait)))

Somehow I though of cooling system efficiency in F1 car in terms of drag it creates given same cooling requirements.
But yes, running a hotter engine with same heat output not only permits to dissipate less heat, but makes dissipation easier.
timbo
 
Joined: 22 Oct 2007

Post Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:24 am

timbo wrote:
xpensive wrote:Isn't convection of energy between radiators and the passing air-stream proportional to difference in temperature?

Well, of course. I learned that lesson hard when tried to cool thermostat tank without forced cooling (5 liters) from 25oC to below 20oC. It was a looong wait)))

Somehow I though of cooling system efficiency in F1 car in terms of drag it creates given same cooling requirements.
But yes, running a hotter engine with same heat output not only permits to dissipate less heat, but makes dissipation easier.


I wonder if the engines fuel efficiency is also related to cooling - my knowledge is patchy at best but I believe that evaporation of fuel in the cylinders contributes to their cooling. Therefore running a richer mix can help cool the engine. If the merc can run hotter could they then also run leaner, even if just a few percent then it would help explain their greater fuel efficiency.
myurr
 
Joined: 20 Mar 2008

Post Mon Sep 14, 2009 9:51 am

sorry if the questions seems silly (don't know much about mechanics), but if an engine has a better power curve, will it help reducing the stress of internal parts, hence reduce heating?

How about the lubricant? how much does it help reducing or distributing heat?
tarzoon
 
Joined: 17 May 2006
Location: White and blue football club

Post Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:38 am

Or maybe it's just a co-incidence, i'm sure a decent engine helps but remember how bad McLaren were until they sorted out their bad aero/weight distribution..
Callum
 
Joined: 18 Jan 2009
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Post Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:33 am

I won't buy into the cooling thing though so blindly though.. I don't see any relation for the engine cooling and the inlet size this year.. they said the Ferrari and Renault were hot heads but look at the inlets they are the tiniest!

If any thing the Benz has one of the biggest inlets. So i don't buy the tiny radiator Cool engine thing as i said before.. That Engine got something special on the INSIDE!! Some alien technology in the metals or lubricant! The Benz might even be running at higher flame temperatures, lower friction parts,

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
"I was blessed with the ability to understand how cars move," he explains. "You know how in 'The Matrix,' he can see the matrix? When I'm driving, I see the lines."
n smikle
 
Joined: 12 Jun 2008

Post Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:27 pm

I think the Merc engine program really picked up in Velencia. Since then they have been on a tear. One of the things that exaggerate this the tightness of the grids. I cannot remember the F1 grids being tighter than they are today. A tenth of a second on a 90 second lap makes a damn big difference these days.

I would also agree that Force India's success is not entirely due to the Merc engine but I do think back to last season when Torro Rosso got hot at the end of the season running the re-speced Ferrari motor while sister team Red Bull faded with the Renault motor.

I think there's a lot more changes going on in the motor department than anyone lets on. These upcoming last few races don't seem to be as motor dependent so we might have a bit of equalizing amongst the field and if that actually happens I predict the fields will get even tighter.
BreezyRacer
 
Joined: 3 Nov 2006

Next

Return to General chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 360Spider, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], tepek and 8 guests