Advantages of Over/Understeer

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
0

Post Wed Mar 31, 2010 2:29 pm

autogyro wrote:It is DF that has ruined the finer points of O/S U/S in F1.
I liked the comparison with a stock car on a loose surface half sideways through the apex.


Picture taken @ 1981 -- ground effect at it's peak
Image
timbo
8
 
Joined: 22 Oct 2007

0

Post Wed Mar 31, 2010 3:02 pm

Good catch by a brilliant driver but not what I am saying at all.
autogyro
33
 
Joined: 4 Oct 2009

0

Post Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:00 pm

Image

maybe something more from your child hood autogyro? :lol:

Its bio fueled has no wings no gearbox losses and a spec set of engines
"The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me."
flynfrog
42
User avatar
 
Joined: 23 Mar 2006

0

Post Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:14 pm

nah the engine is not spec....you can have some wildly varying standard for "1 horsepower"...lol
RacingManiac
4
 
Joined: 22 Nov 2004

0

Post Wed Mar 31, 2010 7:09 pm

Certainly a drivers sport.
I would not suggest you try to put one in a wind tunnel.
autogyro
33
 
Joined: 4 Oct 2009

0

Post Wed Mar 31, 2010 7:21 pm

autogyro wrote:Certainly a drivers sport.
I would not suggest you try to put one in a wind tunnel.

I do believe that gentlemen has a redbull shark fin on his head.
"The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me."
flynfrog
42
User avatar
 
Joined: 23 Mar 2006

0

Post Wed Mar 31, 2010 8:34 pm

Don't forget the engine's "exhaust" :mrgreen:
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
105
User avatar
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

0

Post Thu Apr 08, 2010 1:37 pm

Hey guys,

I'm a little confused with the physics behind the rule: Reaerward weight bias = oversteer, and front weight bias=understeer.

The way I see it, the momentum of the car is the same regardless, and by shifting wiehgt forward the normal force on the front tyres is larger, causing more grip and hence oversteer.

When I heard I was wrong, I thought about it another way: The centripetal force required to keep the rear end in line is larger if the rear end has more mass, hence moving the balance rearwards will cause oversteer as is the rule. Problem is though, wouldn't this increase in centripetal force required by fullfilled by the extra reaer grip due to increased normal force?

Thanks guys ;)
Last edited by mx_tifoso on Thu Apr 08, 2010 5:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged the 'Longitudinal Weight Distribution: Oversteer and Understeer' thread into this one,
VODAFONE McLAREN MERCEDES
the stig
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 8 Jul 2008
Location: Gex, France

0

Post Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:48 pm

Tires work more 'efficiently' (higher coefficient of friction) with less load. So while yes, as you put more mass on the front axle the tires WILL produce more total lateral FORCE capacity.. it is at a decreasing rate relative to how much load you've added.

Peak coefficient of friction is what matters in this case, for limit trim.

However, if you have forward 'load' transfer from acceleration, it is the opposite scenario. You've added normal force to the front axle without increasing the mass.. opposite in the rear axle.. so forward load transfer will (all things being equal) tend to shift the car balance more toward oversteer.
Grip is a four letter word.

2 is the new #1.
Jersey Tom
127
 
Joined: 29 May 2006
Location: Huntersville, NC

Previous

Return to General chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 10 guests