WhiteBlue wrote:I'm convinced that 90% of the German, French, Italian and Spanish flights could have been executed if a better prediction of the ash levels and proper procedures had been developed for the scenario. I'm not saying the governments did something wrong. But if this thing happens again and all parties are 100% prepared very few flights outside the UK and Scandinavia would be called off. Air traffic to Germany is almost back to normal now. It turns out that airlines can manage with radar guided VFR in most cases and that the turbine damage from very low ash intake can be deal with by increased boroscopic inspection schedules.
autogyro wrote:The trouble is, predictions on the density and danger posed by the ash cloud has been done using computer simulation and not reality.
The British Labour government had no choice, because last Month it had taken out of service the only aircraft with a radar capable of giving acurate 'real' data, the MK3 Nimrod.
So as usual everything is being done using guess work and the results have taken humanity a little further away from reality.
The ash cloud is pretty much dispersed now so flights are resuming, the only problem is another ash cloud is on its way and there is the possibility of a much bigger eruption.
autogyro wrote:The trouble is, predictions on the density and danger posed by the ash cloud has been done using computer simulation and not reality.
The British Labour government had no choice, because last Month it had taken out of service the only aircraft with a radar capable of giving acurate 'real' data, the MK3 Nimrod.
So as usual everything is being done using guess work and the results have taken humanity a little further away from reality.
The ash cloud is pretty much dispersed now so flights are resuming, the only problem is another ash cloud is on its way and there is the possibility of a much bigger eruption.

autogyro wrote:The trouble is, predictions on the density and danger posed by the ash cloud has been done using computer simulation and not reality.
The British Labour government had no choice, because last Month it had taken out of service the only aircraft with a radar capable of giving acurate 'real' data, the MK3 Nimrod.
So as usual everything is being done using guess work and the results have taken humanity a little further away from reality.
The ash cloud is pretty much dispersed now so flights are resuming, the only problem is another ash cloud is on its way and there is the possibility of a much bigger eruption.
WhiteBlue wrote:I'm convinced that 90% of the German, French, Italian and Spanish flights could have been executed if a better prediction of the ash levels and proper procedures had been developed for the scenario. I'm not saying the governments did something wrong. But if this thing happens again and all parties are 100% prepared very few flights outside the UK and Scandinavia would be called off. Air traffic to Germany is almost back to normal now. It turns out that airlines can manage with radar guided VFR in most cases and that the turbine damage from very low ash intake can be deal with by increased boroscopic inspection schedules.
Edis wrote:WhiteBlue wrote:I'm convinced that 90% of the German, French, Italian and Spanish flights could have been executed if a better prediction of the ash levels and proper procedures had been developed for the scenario. I'm not saying the governments did something wrong. But if this thing happens again and all parties are 100% prepared very few flights outside the UK and Scandinavia would be called off. Air traffic to Germany is almost back to normal now. It turns out that airlines can manage with radar guided VFR in most cases and that the turbine damage from very low ash intake can be deal with by increased boroscopic inspection schedules.
Aircraft engine manufacturer doesn't allow any ash in the air for flight. So any ash is too much.
Ash is highly abrasive and contrain very small particles. They will damage fans and compressors by erosion, they will end up in the engine oil. They will melt in the combustion chamber where their high sulphur levels will cause corrision in a rapid rate, and they can cause a flame out. They will solidify on the turbines where they will damage their heat insulating surface and they can also clog the small cooling air channels that are used to cool the hot parts in the engine causing the engine to overheat.
Edis wrote:Aircraft engine manufacturer doesn't allow any ash in the air for flight. So any ash is too much.
autogyro wrote:The reason why....
Users browsing this forum: RicerDude, Yandex [Bot] and 8 guests