SiLo wrote:Surely that could be created by having the latter part of the tube opening up to create a venturi? Therefore sucking the air through the hole. Wouldn't that be very beneficial if is was sucking air from infront of the rear wheels, creating a loss of pressure and a loss of drag.
I´m sure some teams, can´t get the optimum out of flexi wings (wing in gound effect WiG), because their diffusor is not working at high pitch angles(rake).
But that´s just my opinion, I could be wrong
SiLo wrote:Ok I see now. Changing it slightly, what about more channels underneath the car? To channel MORE of the air through the diffuser, obviously the channel would have to be inset, but instead of having one, maybe two or three feeding it? Or would that then create venturis inbetween the channels where they meet because the air would be going at different speeds?
wesley123 wrote:look at the renault, wich got such underbody tunnels to grab air. If it was disallowed renault woudnt have it. The Renault also uses it as side protection.
Shrek wrote:I was wondering what happens if you don't have a diffuser? Other than drag would increase
SiLo wrote:Yeah I think if they want to increase overtaking they should decrease wing size but increase the size/flexibility of the diffuser. Flexibility as in, with the rules, I don't think F1 could cope with flexing diffusers....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests