2011 WDC and WCC odds

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.

Post Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:09 am

Today is a historical new high for Hamilton odds. At a market value of 241k€ Hamilton hits 8 for the first time.

Image

I have no doubt the negative move comes from the bad testing news for McLaren.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)
WhiteBlue
 
Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Post Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:14 am

Why MW is behind the 2 Mclaren driver? What are the pointers?
WilliamsF1
 
Joined: 6 Jan 2010

Post Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:52 am

WilliamsF1 wrote:Why MW is behind the 2 Mclaren driver? What are the pointers?


Webber's odds are better than Button's. I'm not surprised by this move in the market, WB, are you? What is surprising me is that Button has not moved out at the same rate as Hamilton. Bookies think he's dealing with the car better, maybe?

The real shock for me from the above is how wide the odds on Massa are. Poor bloke, he's been totally written off as a title contender.
"Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words." - Chuang Tzu
horse
 
Joined: 23 Oct 2009
Location: Edinburgh

Post Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:19 pm

Perhaps Webber and Massa's positions reflect the perception that each is very much the number 2 driver in their respective teams?
Just_a_fan
 
Joined: 31 Jan 2010

Post Thu Mar 10, 2011 5:05 pm

I was going to say something simlar to just a fan. Webber(lets supose) has a better car than Hamilton. He's odd should be better, but he still has to beat vettel. Which is (according to the bets) improbable. As is, it's more probable that Hamilton beats vettel than Webber beats vettel.


Remember the odds are for world champion. Though I'm really a Webber fan I think Webber will need a really great driving and luck to beat Vettel.
Come back 747, we miss you!!
Caito
 
Joined: 16 Jun 2009
Location: Argentina

Post Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:08 pm

What were Lewis's odds in 2009?
rfs
 
Joined: 13 Mar 2010

Post Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:19 pm

horse wrote:
WilliamsF1 wrote:Webber's odds are better than Button's. I'm not surprised by this move in the market, WB, are you? What is surprising me is that Button has not moved out at the same rate as Hamilton. Bookies think he's dealing with the car better, maybe?


These WDC odds are based on an automatic algorithm which determines them from the money bet on each driver. So bookies opinion do not come into it. Webber is simply rated by the car he drives (supposed to be the best) and versus his team mate who is the top driver for 2011 WDC atm.

I agree that Button is relatively high rated compared to Massa and Webber. It might be speculation that he will be good on the Pirellis. Personally I don't believe in that theory. It could simply be his 2009 WDC status that is giving him a bonus with the punters.

Today BetFair opened the market for WCC odds.

Image

Although the market is very small I have more confidence in the odds than the Williams Hill odds I have previously tracked. I will use BetFair for WCC odds as well.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)
WhiteBlue
 
Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Post Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:46 pm

Odds depends only on money bet? Meaning that if I put lots of money on Perez he would have better odds than Vettel, right?
Come back 747, we miss you!!
Caito
 
Joined: 16 Jun 2009
Location: Argentina

Post Thu Mar 10, 2011 9:11 pm

It could actually not be a reflection of Webber, but a reflection that people think that Webber can't beat Vettel, ie they think Hamilton beating Button is more likely than Webber beating Vettel. Because once you can't beat your teammate, there is 0 chance you'll be champion. You have to be able to beat your teammate first before being able to hope of becoming champion

EG (theoretically)
if we had:

Kubica - Yamamoto in Red Bull,
then
Vettel-Liuzzi in HRT

Nobody in their right minds would bet for Yamamoto, as they'd be thinking, "he might be in the fastest car, but no way he'll beat Kubica." And then, "There's no way Liuzzi would beat Vettel."

Given the following presumptions, Vettel and Kubica are the only 2 shots for the title (in this theoretical 4 horse race) as Yamamoto and Liuzzi would get suckered by their teammates anyways. Vettel could place higher than Yamamoto in the betting odds.

I hope I made sense
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

Post Thu Mar 10, 2011 9:15 pm

Caito wrote:Odds depends only on money bet? Meaning that if I put lots of money on Perez he would have better odds than Vettel, right?

Indeed. But you would have to use quite a bit of money. The balanced market is €253,455. I reckon that almost 30% of that is on Vettel. So you would have to commit something like €76,200 on Perez to push him up.

Atm the size of the WCC market is very small at €790.

Image

WDC and WCC odds are now updated with BetFair figures. McLaren is now closer to Mercedes than Ferrari.

Image

Webber is catching up and Hamilton is loosing ground on him.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)
WhiteBlue
 
Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Post Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:50 pm

What if you divide the driver by the car odds?
"I was blessed with the ability to understand how cars move," he explains. "You know how in 'The Matrix,' he can see the matrix? When I'm driving, I see the lines."
n smikle
 
Joined: 12 Jun 2008

Post Fri Mar 11, 2011 3:57 am

I think the series graphic is now becoming informative as the Webber vs Hamilton situation evolves. You clearly see that not only is the Red Bull looking stronger but also the McLaren is looking weaker by the number of tests they do.


n smikle wrote:What if you divide the driver by the car odds?


I have done that in the past but slightly different. I have first divided the car odds by the leading car's value to create standardized car odds. Then I did the division of the driver odds by the car odds.

The problem with this method is the huge distortion you see when the car odds go beyond 10. So all you can really compare are front running drivers with relatively equal cars. This year I would say that Red Bull and Ferrari would fit the bill and possibly McLaren and Mercedes. I'm not sure the pre season odds are really going to reflect what we may see behind the top two cars. So at the moment I'm not eager to do this additional work. Per haps I will if we get a good scenario with more cars well below the odds of 10.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)
WhiteBlue
 
Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Post Sat Mar 12, 2011 12:16 am

Update of the WDC and WCC odds after dry winter testing completed.

Image

McLaren are caught by Mercedes on joint odds of 7. Hamilton goes up to 9.

Image

Button goes up to 16.5 and gets passed by Schumacher and Rosberg.

Image

A new serial plot shows the WCC odds. Only the 11.03. odds are from BetFair but in the future all data will be from this source.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)
WhiteBlue
 
Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Post Tue Mar 15, 2011 10:44 am

Hi WB. In your Excel screenshot you have a column called "global." Is that a mean figure, or is that actually a bookie?
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

Post Tue Mar 15, 2011 11:08 am

raymondu999 wrote:Hi WB. In your Excel screenshot you have a column called "global." Is that a mean figure, or is that actually a bookie?

That is a reference to my 2010 methodology. I used bookies from the UK, Germany and Spain to average global odds. I have been criticised for massive over runs that recreational betting produces. As a result I have changed the WDC odds in February to the BetFair odds which are computer algorithm driven. Thus I'm pretty sure that they really represent the betting money. I also record what BetFair call the balanced market. That is only the part of the bets that are actually matched with conditions set by the better. Only matched bets are considered by the algorithm which determines the odds.

For WCC odds I have used William Hill for some weeks because no other odds were available. But now I have switched that to BetFair as well. The market has grown slowly and is much smaller than the WDC market but it is fairly sensitive to technical and performance news.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)
WhiteBlue
 
Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Location: WhiteBlue Country

PreviousNext

Return to General chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests