JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:.....
But Hamilton may rather have meant what he said alot more than he would have us think....I could be wrong.
I certainly think his irony hints at a deeper feeling of frustration, through a lack of stewarding consistency. Much of course depends on how the Sporting Code defines and interprets the definition of an
'avoidable accident'. For the sake of doubt lets suppose that it is consistent with hitting another car, then we have the following inconsistency from the Monaco GP:
Schumacher breaks of Lewis' diffuser endplate at St Devote - avoidable? penalty?
Massa hits Rosberg in back on climb up the hill from St Devote - avoidable? penalty?
Massa on turn-in sharply at Loews to cut-off Hamilton and hits Webber at the rear - avoidable? penalty?
Di Resta hits D'Ambrosio at Loews (after the Alguersuari coming together)and damages his wing - avoidable? penalty?
Kobayashi hits Sutil at Mirabeau - avoidable? penalty?
These are the...
'is it co's i iz....' that I believe Lewis hints at.
sAx