timbo wrote:raymondu999 wrote:mep; andy - Isn't the point of a directional mike that there is very little ambient noise around, as the mike is very line of sight?
The practical reality is that attenuation is far from perfect.
Definitely not enough for F1 engine vs human voice.
raymondu999 wrote:mep; andy - Isn't the point of a directional mike that there is very little ambient noise around, as the mike is very line of sight?
marekk wrote:Don't think it's a problem anymore. Active digital noise cancelation systems are very effective those days, and it's relatively easy to filter out noise sources of known characteristics in digital doamin.
raymondu999 wrote:then what is stopping teams from bringing directional mike gear and aiming it at the opponent's pit wall booths?
raymondu999 wrote:mep; andy - Isn't the point of a directional mike that there is very little ambient noise around, as the mike is very line of sight?
Tim.Wright wrote:raymondu999 wrote:then what is stopping teams from bringing directional mike gear and aiming it at the opponent's pit wall booths?
The fact that there is a personnel limit at the races and there are already enough things to worry about other than trying to wire up and camouflage a microphone.
Tim
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests