Nose as bad as the Ferrari
THat's a photo from 2011 for sure. I didn't realize it until you asked about the front wing - The front wing hasn't got the secondary "r-shaped" cascade yet in that photo.Peetbeat wrote:It would be very nice if someone tells us the difference. What about the front wing? is it the rb7 or rb8 http://www.f1today.nl/foto.php?file=19211
Redragon wrote:Where are the exhauts?
Which is interesting as McLaren look like they've got a more heavily raked car this year - at least equal to last years car. Will be interesting to see who's got their sum right.Giblet wrote:They were able to run more rake because of the EBD. This is in the Newey questionaire above.myurr wrote:Is it me or is the car running less rake than in previous years?
Looks like a fancy wickerbill.Crucial_Xtreme wrote:
According to scarbs on twitter they used to have a vent under the nose and now have this vent instead. Could be running positive pressure in the cockpit.raymondu999 wrote:The front wing has really moved forwards relative to its supports.
Is that a vent?
THat's a photo from 2011 for sure. I didn't realize it until you asked about the front wing - The front wing hasn't got the secondary "r-shaped" cascade yet in that photo.Peetbeat wrote:It would be very nice if someone tells us the difference. What about the front wing? is it the rb7 or rb8 http://www.f1today.nl/foto.php?file=19211
Do you mean RB5?Shakeman wrote:I can't quite believe what I'm seeing.
Well it's a fight between Ferrari and RB for the ugly duckling award.
The rear end looks nice but we can't rely on an RB production showing us a good view of the back end.
Exhausts in RB6 position.
It looks like it at a glance; but that is actually the under nose vane; which due to parallax appears directly on the bib. It's actually the vane thing that's under the nose.ben_watkins wrote:The bib/tea tray looks amazing from the drawing... any photos of it in detail?
Dear God!!Giblet wrote:Do a ctrl-f and type 'you know'.
Seb has a new goto phrase. 15 times in one interview.