hairy_scotsman wrote:xpensive wrote:Oh but I know what GA means but what is grass seating, just hanging around or what?
Yeah...typical GA I suppose...but there is no word if chairs, etc will be allowed. It's hard for me to see 80,000 people all on shuttle buses with chairs, etc.
GA would be a great way to go at this track, but if these details are accurate, it would seem they want to make GA as inconvenient and unpleasant as possible.
Do they realize that without great GA sales, they're screwed no matter how many high-dollar PSLs, etc that they sell?
WhiteBlue wrote:...
Improper and unlawful take over by withholding promised funding. That is a very serious claim. It pretty much describes what I have thought has happened there last year. It will be interesting what the law will say about the claims and what additional information will emerge through the law suit.
xpensive wrote:So WB, do you figure this will have an impact on the completion of the track by August and the race in November?
WhiteBlue wrote:xpensive wrote:So WB, do you figure this will have an impact on the completion of the track by August and the race in November?
I don't think so. The contract battle with Ecclestone was also conducted without loosing the race. So one assumes that all parties of the law suit have a vested interest to see the race going forward and take place. The law suit is about money and correcting the supposedly unlawful actions of Mr. Epstein.
xpensive wrote:I still believe that Epstein and McCombs are dependent on more investments to complete the track, I just don't think they have the estimated 300 MUSD to do so. I'm afraid these recent events will make it very difficult to raise more.
Hail22 wrote:If thats the case, which circuit would replace Austin if it doesn't make the cut?
or will it just be similar to Bahrain 2011 that it is a non-raced event (points go begging).
xpensive wrote:I still believe that Epstein and McCombs are dependent on more investments to complete the track, I just don't think they have the estimated 300 MUSD to do so. I'm afraid these recent events will make it very difficult to raise more.
WhiteBlue wrote:xpensive wrote:I still believe that Epstein and McCombs are dependent on more investments to complete the track, I just don't think they have the estimated 300 MUSD to do so. I'm afraid these recent events will make it very difficult to raise more.
It is anybodies guess! The way money is spend now it looks like there is no shortage of cash at all. Which leads me back to the old suspicion that the trifle of a $ 500,000 finance bill was simply used as a pretence to sabotage Tavo's initial plans to be COTA's chairman and public icon. Nobody ever disputed his claim to the whole idea of having an F1 race and dedicated circuit near Austin. But some people seems to have got greedy and almost managed to fock it all up.
Users browsing this forum: AddThis [Crawler], Carmack, Moving Chicane, RicerDude, timbo and 6 guests