Red Bull RB8 - A-spec vs B-spec

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Anything related to a specific race should go in the appropriate race thread.

Which should they have kept?

A-spec
26
62%
B-spec
16
38%
 
Total votes : 42

Post Sat Apr 07, 2012 5:59 pm

raymondu999 wrote:That's what I meant. They have over 1220km (4 grand prix distances - 2 for each car) of running data for this current spec, and all the test data for the A-spec. Unless there was a clear benefit it wouldn't have stayed on. But my point was wondering if they took a "one step back, 2 steps forward" gamble. Ie mabe the B-spec is weaker than the -spec in some areas, but as a package overall it's quicker. If that makes sense.


Makes perfect sense. Everything in F1 is a compromise so I wouldn't be at all surprised if someone was able to show that the A-spec had some specific benefits. The team obviously believes that whatever the advantages of the b-spec are that they outweigh the disadvantages.

It's funny how many people are voting for the A-spec in this thread. They obviously think the team are fools!
myurr
 
Joined: 20 Mar 2008

Post Sat Apr 07, 2012 7:36 pm

Might not be. I think a consensus on one of the "steps back" taken by the team has been consistency/drivability. A car that has a slower "theoretical max laptime" but is more drivable could potentially still produce a quicker laptime.

With a new sidepod concept as such though - it could possibly be that the current spec provides more upgrade potential.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

Post Sat Apr 07, 2012 7:53 pm

raymondu999 wrote:Might not be. I think a consensus on one of the "steps back" taken by the team has been consistency/drivability. A car that has a slower "theoretical max laptime" but is more drivable could potentially still produce a quicker laptime.

With a new sidepod concept as such though - it could possibly be that the current spec provides more upgrade potential.

I agree! but a very good driver will be able to extract everything from the undrivable car..so it will be faster..
amouzouris
 
Joined: 14 Feb 2011

Post Sat Apr 07, 2012 7:55 pm

Fernando Alonso begs to differ.
bhallg2k
 
Joined: 28 Feb 2006

Post Sat Apr 07, 2012 8:47 pm

amouzouris wrote:
raymondu999 wrote:Might not be. I think a consensus on one of the "steps back" taken by the team has been consistency/drivability. A car that has a slower "theoretical max laptime" but is more drivable could potentially still produce a quicker laptime.

With a new sidepod concept as such though - it could possibly be that the current spec provides more upgrade potential.

I agree! but a very good driver will be able to extract everything from the undrivable car..so it will be faster..

I know what you mean - but I don't think it's about a "good" driver. I think it's just that category of drivers who can handle a diabolical car. Some drivers are just good in a good car. Case in point, JB.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

Post Sat Apr 07, 2012 9:13 pm

raymondu999 wrote:
amouzouris wrote:
raymondu999 wrote:Might not be. I think a consensus on one of the "steps back" taken by the team has been consistency/drivability. A car that has a slower "theoretical max laptime" but is more drivable could potentially still produce a quicker laptime.

With a new sidepod concept as such though - it could possibly be that the current spec provides more upgrade potential.

I agree! but a very good driver will be able to extract everything from the undrivable car..so it will be faster..

I know what you mean - but I don't think it's about a "good" driver. I think it's just that category of drivers who can handle a diabolical car. Some drivers are just good in a good car. Case in point, JB.

thats what i meant!! :D
amouzouris
 
Joined: 14 Feb 2011

Post Sun Apr 08, 2012 12:57 am

myurr wrote:It's funny how many people are voting for the A-spec in this thread. They obviously think the team are fools!


Voted for the A-spec because the B-spec is a development dead end, not because it's somehow slower.
I've found a way of ducting exhaust right to the diffuser edge like in 2011 and created a new wheel fastener that could allow sub 2 second pitstops see them here --> My 2013 F1 Concept Project
MIKEY_!
 
Joined: 10 Jul 2011
Location: On my horse, my horse is amazing.

Post Sun Apr 08, 2012 3:18 am

MIKEY_! wrote:the B-spec is a development dead end

How do you know this, pray tell?
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

Post Sun Apr 08, 2012 4:11 am

In my opinion. I explained my reasons earlier in the thread.
I've found a way of ducting exhaust right to the diffuser edge like in 2011 and created a new wheel fastener that could allow sub 2 second pitstops see them here --> My 2013 F1 Concept Project
MIKEY_!
 
Joined: 10 Jul 2011
Location: On my horse, my horse is amazing.

Post Sun Apr 08, 2012 12:31 pm

no you did not, you explained why the A-spec was better, not why the B-spec is a 'development dead end'
wesley123
 
Joined: 23 Feb 2008

Post Sun Apr 08, 2012 2:00 pm

What I also find funny is looking back at all the people who said that the championship was over for the non-Red Bull cars when the B-spec was released and how they all now think Red Bull are stupid and should go back to the A-spec :)
myurr
 
Joined: 20 Mar 2008

Post Sun Apr 08, 2012 4:20 pm

Aye - that's quite true!
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

Post Sun Apr 08, 2012 4:26 pm

myurr wrote:What I also find funny is looking back at all the people who said that the championship was over for the non-Red Bull cars when the B-spec was released and how they all now think Red Bull are stupid and should go back to the A-spec :)

In my defense, I'd been staring at the F2012 for weeks.
bhallg2k
 
Joined: 28 Feb 2006

Post Tue Apr 10, 2012 9:50 pm

I am not sure really,,, I think B Spec is best -the B spec makes great use of the coanda effect but it messes up the flow around the sidepods which in my opinion, goes against the RBR design philosophy a bit, you never know, this may be the correct route, or could be the complete wrong route,
Budding F1 Engineer
N12ck
 
Joined: 19 Dec 2010

Post Wed Apr 11, 2012 11:21 am

I have no doubt Newey knows what he's doing. What caught me off guard and caused me to start this thread is how RBR have seemingly sacrificed a coke bottle which they have refined and perfected over 3 years
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

PreviousNext

Return to Formula One cars

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 6 guests