Rethinking 2008 cars with 2012 knowledge

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
0

Post Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:25 pm

In 2008 we had severely different regulations .. assuming that a team is asked to draw a car for 2008 championship now, with all the new knowledge gained from teams in years, how would they look?

I think F-duct would have been useful
EBD? Would it be convenient to race? The extra weight would have been recovered by the gain of downforce and traction? Or were 2008's high exhausts the best solution?
What suspension style choose at the rear? Push or pull?
Nose and front wing style would change?
Diffusers may would have taken the DDD-style of 2009-10?
Wheelbase?
Javert
1
User avatar
 
Joined: 10 Feb 2011

0

Post Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:31 pm

Thats an interesting thought.

But i think the DDD's was a result of a hole in the 09 regulations. I dont think it would be possible under 08 regs.

And why do you believe the EBD would have a weight penalty??
Holm86
6
User avatar
 
Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

0

Post Tue Apr 17, 2012 3:48 pm

Holm86 wrote:But i think the DDD's was a result of a hole in the 09 regulations.

A very literal one! :lol:

It is indeed a very interesting thought though.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
106
User avatar
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

0

Post Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:04 am

DDD
F-duct
EBD with overrun (refuelling baby!)
Pull rods
slim line rear ends
High nose(?)
Wheel "spinners"
Split end-plate front wings.
Trailing fins on the rear end plate
Flexi wings
"I was blessed with the ability to understand how cars move," he explains. "You know how in 'The Matrix,' he can see the matrix? When I'm driving, I see the lines."
n smikle
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 12 Jun 2008

0

Post Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:28 am

No point in split end plates, those work to direct air around the outside of the tyres, whereas the wing regulations from '08 make it more practical to direct air inside the frot tyres.

flexing wings were already in the game then, though not in the same way as they are now. I believe Mclaren had a wing that flexed to give better top speed. A bit different from the current approach but when your wing is already really close to the ground like now, small changes will give you a bigger gain in downforce from the ground effect. I think in '08 this would not be the way to go.

DDD (if legal), F duct, EBD, wheel rim covers would definitely be on there.

I'm not sure about pullrod. I know its a disadvantage if you want to run DDD, but I'm not familiar enough with the packaging on those cars to know if there's anything to be gained.
Lycoming
33
User avatar
 
Joined: 25 Aug 2011

0

Post Wed Apr 18, 2012 2:36 am

You can split the end-plates on the inside to control the air in between the wheels - Just look on the Lotus (Renault).
"I was blessed with the ability to understand how cars move," he explains. "You know how in 'The Matrix,' he can see the matrix? When I'm driving, I see the lines."
n smikle
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 12 Jun 2008

0

Post Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:05 am

raymondu999 wrote:
Holm86 wrote:But i think the DDD's was a result of a hole in the 09 regulations.

A very literal one! :lol:

It is indeed a very interesting thought though.


And then the teams were blowing hot and cold until the 2012 regs !
Sombrero
30
 
Joined: 22 Feb 2012

0

Post Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:17 am

It seems to me that the cars are becoming slower as time goes by. The fastest pole lap in Melbourne was in the 1:34:00's by Schumacher this year they didn't touch that.

Will the cars slow down more with the new engines in 2014?
Maelstrom
0
 
Joined: 26 Mar 2012

0

Post Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:13 am

f-duct front and rear
EBD
off throttle blowing
from my understanding ferrari did test EBD in 2008 but they didn't have the map to work it properly
mike
3
User avatar
 
Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Location: Australia, Melbourne

0

Post Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:25 am

I recall reading somewhere that they stopped using blown diffusers a bit before 08 because they really upset the balance and stability under the current aero regs.

Can't remember where I read it though :(
krisfx
2
 
Joined: 4 Jan 2012

0

Post Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:38 am

That's a long time back IIRC. Sometime in the Hakkinen championship years I think. By none other than Mr. A. Newey
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
106
User avatar
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

0

Post Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:22 am

krisfx wrote:I recall reading somewhere that they stopped using blown diffusers a bit before 08 because they really upset the balance and stability under the current aero regs.

Can't remember where I read it though :(


Scarbs had a good blog about it. Ferrari were the first to move away from the blown diffuser in 98, exiting the exhausts over the engine cover. I think the move happened for a number of reasons. One is, as you say, the sensitivty to throttle positions. The second is that heat resistant materials were not as advanced back then, and the exhaust gases sometimes ended up deforming the rear suspension. Final reason is that the 98 regulations meant the engines had to move further forward, relative to the rest of the car. This meant, in order to blow the diffuser you needed longer exhaust pipes, which was not good for the engine (i think the engine works better at higher revs when the exhaust pipes are shorter - this article explains it in detail http://www.grandprix.com/ft/ft00360.html ).

It is interesting that Newey was the last designer to keep the blow diffuser, and it seems he grudgingly got rid of it at the request of Mario Illien. He was also the first to bring it back. He's never really produced a dominant car without it. He definitely seems to know how to exploit it.
Gerhard Berger
1
 
Joined: 20 Sep 2010

0

Post Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:24 am

n smikle wrote:DDD
F-duct
EBD with overrun (refuelling baby!)
Pull rods
slim line rear ends
High nose(?)
Wheel "spinners"
Split end-plate front wings.
Trailing fins on the rear end plate
Flexi wings


Not sure how well pull rod would work at the rear with the old larger diffusers.
Gerhard Berger
1
 
Joined: 20 Sep 2010

0

Post Wed Apr 18, 2012 11:10 am

Gerhard Berger wrote:It is interesting that Newey was the last designer to keep the blow diffuser, and it seems he grudgingly got rid of it at the request of Mario Illien. He was also the first to bring it back. He's never really produced a dominant car without it. He definitely seems to know how to exploit it.

Was it on his Williamses? I'm quite sure the DC/Hakkinen McLarens had it
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
106
User avatar
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

0

Post Wed Apr 18, 2012 11:31 am

raymondu999 wrote:
Gerhard Berger wrote:It is interesting that Newey was the last designer to keep the blow diffuser, and it seems he grudgingly got rid of it at the request of Mario Illien. He was also the first to bring it back. He's never really produced a dominant car without it. He definitely seems to know how to exploit it.

Was it on his Williamses? I'm quite sure the DC/Hakkinen McLarens had it


Yeh though they were closer to the center of the car:
Image
Gerhard Berger
1
 
Joined: 20 Sep 2010

Next

Return to General chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: beelsebob, flynfrog and 8 guests