Rethinking 2008 cars with 2012 knowledge

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.

Post Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:09 pm

Gerhard Berger wrote:He [Newey] was also the first to bring it back. He's never really produced a dominant car without it. He definitely seems to know how to exploit it.


Interesting point actually, wonder if anyone will refute it. I also wonder if that's because simulations of the blown diffusers are not that great so that the aerodynamicists rely more on their intuition than computers / wind tunnel.
myurr
 
Joined: 20 Mar 2008

Post Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:23 pm

Why would there be a DDD in 2008? The DDD was created to sidestep the diffuser restrictions in 2009.
richard_leeds
 
Joined: 15 Apr 2009
Location: UK

Post Wed Apr 18, 2012 2:48 pm

But it still allows you you produce an extra diffuser that is not in the regulated diffuser zone.
"I was blessed with the ability to understand how cars move," he explains. "You know how in 'The Matrix,' he can see the matrix? When I'm driving, I see the lines."
n smikle
 
Joined: 12 Jun 2008

Post Thu Apr 19, 2012 2:21 pm

Also interesting to think what the pecking order would be. Would Mclaren/Ferrari have stayed at the top? Would BMW and Honda still be in F1? Would Red Bull have made their ascent to the top?
Gerhard Berger
 
Joined: 20 Sep 2010

Post Thu Apr 19, 2012 2:30 pm

I think the pecking order would be closer to what it was in 08 rather than now.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

Post Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:36 pm

n smikle wrote:But it still allows you you produce an extra diffuser that is not in the regulated diffuser zone.


i dont think there any space or much benefit for a double deck in the 08 rules though, completely different rear ends.
ell66
 
Joined: 30 Jun 2010

Previous

Return to General chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: amouzouris, machin, Saint and 10 guests