Vodafone McLaren MP4-27 Mercedes

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Anything related to a specific race should go in the appropriate race thread.
0

Post Tue May 01, 2012 3:47 pm

richard_leeds wrote:Surely you mean sprung? It's sods law that when we correct people on the basics we end up typing the opposite of what we meant!

I think this is where I say "Go read the regs sometime, they're not secret you know" :D

Richard



:oops:
I was racing I was faster I passed him I won
Gridlock
14
User avatar
 
Joined: 27 Jan 2012

0

Post Tue May 01, 2012 4:39 pm

Does the fact the duct is sprung or not have significance?

3.15 states that for any part of the car influencing its aerodynamic performance must be secured to a sprung part of the car. Does this mean then by definition that brake ducks do not provide aerodynamic performance?

So what would prevent the use of an 'on track' adjustable duct system?

Brian
hardingfv32
13
 
Joined: 3 Apr 2011

0

Post Tue May 01, 2012 6:56 pm

No pics of the McLaren today? Hrmmm...
GrizzleBoy
14
 
Joined: 5 Mar 2012

0

Post Tue May 01, 2012 7:19 pm

gray41
2
User avatar
 
Joined: 8 Mar 2011

0

Post Tue May 01, 2012 8:41 pm

GrizzleBoy wrote:No pics of the McLaren today? Hrmmm...

Nothing new so no point.
Owen.C93
15
 
Joined: 24 Jul 2010

0

Post Tue May 01, 2012 8:46 pm

Owen.C93 wrote:
GrizzleBoy wrote:No pics of the McLaren today? Hrmmm...

Nothing new so no point.


Seems a bit of a waste imo.

Unless they're planning to run a bunch of new stuff tomorrow to compare and contrast, but then again, the rain would have ruined that plan.
GrizzleBoy
14
 
Joined: 5 Mar 2012

0

Post Tue May 01, 2012 9:04 pm

Button did say that they were not going to be testing any major parts during this test... so maybe they are just refining their package...

The story ran on ESPN F1. (Link: http://en.espnf1.com/mclaren/motorsport/story/77124.html)
akshat21
0
 
Joined: 5 Feb 2010

0

Post Wed May 02, 2012 12:50 am

hardingfv32 wrote:Does the fact the duct is sprung or not have significance?

3.15 states that for any part of the car influencing its aerodynamic performance must be secured to a sprung part of the car. Does this mean then by definition that brake ducks do not provide aerodynamic performance?

So what would prevent the use of an 'on track' adjustable duct system?

Brian


Probably one of those "primary purpose" loop holes.
"I was blessed with the ability to understand how cars move," he explains. "You know how in 'The Matrix,' he can see the matrix? When I'm driving, I see the lines."
n smikle
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 12 Jun 2008

0

Post Wed May 02, 2012 5:55 am

Are the side pods cut a bit sharper? I don't remember their being so sharply undercut.
Chuckjr
2
User avatar
 
Joined: 24 Feb 2012

0

Post Wed May 02, 2012 7:55 am

McLaren has something similar to what Sauber had, right behind the roll hoop. But not an aerofoil shape.

Some one has photo with better view angle for silver car ?

Image

Image
Art & science are disciplines that must work together hand in hand - Horacio Pagani
cccag
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 12 Apr 2012

0

Post Wed May 02, 2012 9:29 am

Image
Every race ends when the chequered flag is out!
Mazdaboy
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 9 Sep 2009
Location: Budapest (Hungary)

0

Post Wed May 02, 2012 10:42 am

Image

Measuring devise on the diffuser.

Image

Image

Image

Measuring something on one side of the nose?
gray41
2
User avatar
 
Joined: 8 Mar 2011

0

Post Wed May 02, 2012 10:46 am

Sensors on the front wing seem to be for measuring their pitch changing system.
Owen.C93
15
 
Joined: 24 Jul 2010

0

Post Wed May 02, 2012 10:50 am

Owen.C93 wrote:Sensors on the front wing seem to be for measuring their pitch changing system.


The hight the nose is running at?

Also looks like there is a tube feeding into the lower element of the wing.
gray41
2
User avatar
 
Joined: 8 Mar 2011

0

Post Wed May 02, 2012 10:51 am

Owen.C93 wrote:Sensors on the front wing seem to be for measuring their pitch changing system.

Thats what i was thinking. A flex induced pitch change
wrcsti
2
 
Joined: 6 Apr 2009

PreviousNext

Return to Formula One cars

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: kwanchepan, MacX, tepek and 19 guests