

jordangp wrote:Another point to mention , that's a bit OT, is there are 2 perforations in the diffuser along the centre? I thought you were only allowed one.
marcush. wrote:Why donb´t they use smoke wands to visualize the air moving over the car? flow fiz seems to tell only about boundary layer issues..but is the general flow of no importance?
Lycoming wrote:marcush. wrote:Why donb´t they use smoke wands to visualize the air moving over the car? flow fiz seems to tell only about boundary layer issues..but is the general flow of no importance?
If you want to do this outside of the wind tunnel, the car would have to carry smoke.
marcush. wrote:Lycoming wrote:marcush. wrote:Why donb´t they use smoke wands to visualize the air moving over the car? flow fiz seems to tell only about boundary layer issues..but is the general flow of no importance?
If you want to do this outside of the wind tunnel, the car would have to carry smoke.
if you put a rake in aero sensitive areas you modify the area you try to measure....
I´d prefer to carry a smoke generator...for testing purposes...
hardingfv32 wrote:In an A380 video they show a model being catapulted through a wall of smoke to visualize the wing vortices. Is this a common technique in aerospace?
Brian
Return to Aerodynamics, chassis and tyres
Users browsing this forum: AddThis [Crawler] and 9 guests