Vodafone McLaren MP4-27 Mercedes

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter does not belong here.

Post Thu May 10, 2012 10:40 pm

"triggered-stalling system on the above-sidepod airflow"... For what possible benefit?

Brian
hardingfv32
 
Joined: 3 Apr 2011

Post Thu May 10, 2012 10:58 pm

hardingfv32 wrote:"triggered-stalling system on the above-sidepod airflow"... For what possible benefit?

Brian


f-ducking the side pod? getting rid of some drag?
"Double points is Tyranny!"
FrukostScones
 
Joined: 25 May 2010
Location: Bonnie's Ranch

Post Thu May 10, 2012 11:04 pm

FrukostScones wrote:
hardingfv32 wrote:"triggered-stalling system on the above-sidepod airflow"... For what possible benefit?

Brian


f-ducking the side pod? getting rid of some drag?

If you could do it, you'd do it all the time – the side pods create lift, so you'd want to dump both drag and lift no matter what situation you're in.
beelsebob
 
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Location: Cupertino, California

Post Fri May 11, 2012 12:02 am

beelsebob wrote:If you could do it, you'd do it all the time


Maybe if you're managing downforce directly, maybe not so much if you're switching the exhaust flow vector
#58
Gridlock
 
Joined: 27 Jan 2012

Post Fri May 11, 2012 3:42 am

Crucial_Xtreme wrote:Oh just wait until Ringo see's this new McLaren nose. :lol: He's been on about the low nose from day one.

I don't think it's a big deal. Why not switch to something that works better if the team determines it is in fact better. The low nose can't be attributed directly to any poor performances.



Haven't been on here in a while..
Saw it from a mile away.
Yes it was only natural they switched. The regulations are so tight that every little performance advantage that can be had, must be had.

The mclaren nose was a dead spot; it was knowingly un-maximized. They knew it wasn't the best aerodynamically, but they thought it had something special to it. Desingn tradition and culture is to blame for this.
Anyway, there is no advantage aerodynamically with a low nose.
The aim is to get equal with the other teams, then find something to get ahead.

If you want to work the tyres right, you need the down-force; in the most consistent way which is at the center of the car. The higher the nose the faster and less disturbed the air is going to the floor and splitter.
For Sure!!
ringo
 
Joined: 29 Mar 2009

Post Fri May 11, 2012 5:01 am

FrukostScones wrote:Image

maybe they need it for their ddrs
picture comparison: http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/form ... 07992.html



I was about to say that as well. I dont have an explanation for it, but that seems logical!

I must say they are still keeping it looking very sexy. I hope they dont go crazy stepping like all the other teams. Its truly a monstrosity of car design to allow such mongoloid looking cars period!
seinfeld
 
Joined: 2 Apr 2010

Post Fri May 11, 2012 5:22 am

seinfeld wrote:
FrukostScones wrote:maybe they need it for their ddrs
picture comparison: http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/form ... 07992.html

I was about to say that as well. I dont have an explanation for it, but that seems logical!

I don't think the change is for DDRS readiness. What stop them build the DDRS in with the old nose given the fact that the new nose is thinner? This is more about moving the high nose design philosophy for better airflow.
kebab
 
Joined: 16 Mar 2009

Post Fri May 11, 2012 6:35 am

ringo wrote:
Crucial_Xtreme wrote:Oh just wait until Ringo see's this new McLaren nose. :lol: He's been on about the low nose from day one.

I don't think it's a big deal. Why not switch to something that works better if the team determines it is in fact better. The low nose can't be attributed directly to any poor performances.



Haven't been on here in a while..
Saw it from a mile away.
Yes it was only natural they switched. The regulations are so tight that every little performance advantage that can be had, must be had.

The mclaren nose was a dead spot; it was knowingly un-maximized. They knew it wasn't the best aerodynamically, but they thought it had something special to it. Desingn tradition and culture is to blame for this.
Anyway, there is no advantage aerodynamically with a low nose.
The aim is to get equal with the other teams, then find something to get ahead.

If you want to work the tyres right, you need the down-force; in the most consistent way which is at the center of the car. The higher the nose the faster and less disturbed the air is going to the floor and splitter.


When you wrote "the higher the nose" do you mean relative to the back of the car or the ground or both?
FemiA
 
Joined: 12 Jan 2011

Post Fri May 11, 2012 6:49 am

I understand it as the higher the underside of the nose in relation to the ground. In other words more space under the nose.
kebab
 
Joined: 16 Mar 2009

Post Fri May 11, 2012 7:31 am

Surely it's the nose to front wing rather than nose to the ground?
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

Post Fri May 11, 2012 9:11 am

They run a test rig at the dffuser and some hump on the nose. What's that? Preparation for higher tub?
timbo
 
Joined: 22 Oct 2007

Post Fri May 11, 2012 9:13 am

According to Whitmarsh, yes.

New vanes on the top of the sidepods as well.
myoozikk
 
Joined: 29 Jun 2010

Post Fri May 11, 2012 9:16 am

I was going to ask the same, also that Ham running low nose, and But running high nose, do people think this is driver preference or just the usual back-to-back testing of parts? One more question, I think I'm right in saying it's the start of Q1 when parc ferme comes into action, so that's when a decision needs to be made?
ajdavison2
 
Joined: 8 Dec 2010

Post Fri May 11, 2012 9:20 am

The bridge on the nose has already been removed. So must have been the visibility test as mentioned.
myoozikk
 
Joined: 29 Jun 2010

Post Fri May 11, 2012 9:35 am

Well its sort of Technical...the Mclaren crew has a new light systems on the jack to make sure everyone has compelted their duty by changing tyres (pointing at several pit failures from Macca in the earlier rounds).

Front wing looks to be working well for Button (visibility issues).
If someone said to me that you can have three wishes, my first would have been to get into racing, my second to be in Formula 1, my third to drive for Ferrari.

Gilles Villeneuve
Hail22
 
Joined: 8 Feb 2012

PreviousNext

Return to F1 Car Hardware & Development

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AddThis [Crawler], Platinet and 36 guests