

GrizzleBoy wrote:Could be checking to see how low they can get the drivers in comparison with the highest point of the chassis for center of gravity reasons.
Button didn't seem to be happy with the visibility. Don't know Hamiltons opinion.
Kantzis wrote:GrizzleBoy wrote:Could be checking to see how low they can get the drivers in comparison with the highest point of the chassis for center of gravity reasons.
Button didn't seem to be happy with the visibility. Don't know Hamiltons opinion.
Where did you find out that?about button...
GrizzleBoy wrote:Both McLaren boys commenting on having "massive" understeer.
Due to a more effective back end from the new nose? Unbalancing their previous setups and requiring more front wing?
Due to the new nose being less efficient at proving front downforce than the old nose?
EDIT:
Button just came in after complaining about understeer. THey sent him right back out with more clicks on the front wing and he's immediately complaining about "Un-be-lievable understeer guys, unbelievable understeer.".
Adding more front wing made the understeer worse???
astracrazy wrote:could it be before they gained some downforce from the nose itself, but now its moved up this downforce is lost?
edit: love the pic of the slots on the sidepod they look like they have just been dumped on with a bit of double sided tape lol
Crucial_Xtreme wrote:Oh just wait until Ringo see's this new McLaren nose.He's been on about the low nose from day one.
I don't think it's a big deal. Why not switch to something that works better if the team determines it is in fact better. The low nose can't be attributed directly to any poor performances.
astracrazy wrote:this is why i don't understand
a) why this update wasn't introduced earlier in the test
b) why button and hamilton didn't take part in it
maybe this understeer issue would have been found then and fixed by now?
munudeges wrote:Crucial_Xtreme wrote:Oh just wait until Ringo see's this new McLaren nose.He's been on about the low nose from day one.
I don't think it's a big deal. Why not switch to something that works better if the team determines it is in fact better. The low nose can't be attributed directly to any poor performances.
Oh contraire, it is a very big deal because it determines what you have to work with and what can be done with the rest of the car on back, and yes you can blame that on a decline in performances. They started off being the fastest team out there and now quite clearly aren't. That's just pure downforce.
So they switch to something which works better, which every other team has been doing since the season started and where McLaren can't go as far as other teams with nose height so they will always be compromised? Oh, but there was absolutely nothing wrong with the direction they went in from the start though! Sounds like a bit of a contradiction.
I think a few people saw this coming, as the inimitable Ringo did and the BBC and Autoport's Gary Anderson has been banging on about since he was at the actual launch of the car. Not sure about his prose and explanations sometimes, but to be fair to him he's called that exactly right.
Users browsing this forum: AddThis [Crawler], astracrazy, Baidu [Spider], FoxHound, froggy, kwanchepan, miguelalvesreis and 23 guests