Vodafone McLaren MP4-27 Mercedes

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Anything related to a specific race should go in the appropriate race thread.
0

Post Fri Jun 15, 2012 7:04 pm

I thought it was something different because of this:
The team’s mechanics adjust the rear braking system in the pits with a screwdriver, the screw being located near the driver cockpit opening.
There are two things in this world that take no skill: 1. Spending other people’s money and 2. Dismissing an idea.
strad
67
User avatar
 
Joined: 2 Jan 2010

0

Post Fri Jun 15, 2012 7:55 pm

strad wrote:I thought it was something different because of this:
The team’s mechanics adjust the rear braking system in the pits with a screwdriver, the screw being located near the driver cockpit opening.

No we already knew that.
Owen.C93
16
 
Joined: 24 Jul 2010

0

Post Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:12 pm

Okay,,,but the brake duct screw as shown in the picture is a long way from the cockpit.
Thanks
There are two things in this world that take no skill: 1. Spending other people’s money and 2. Dismissing an idea.
strad
67
User avatar
 
Joined: 2 Jan 2010

0

Post Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:13 pm

Cable or hydraulic actuated from a remote location. No room for an extra mechanic near the wheel assembly during the pit stop.

I still do not see why it can not be adjusted 'on track'. This is a brake duct, not an aero device. As a brake duct mounted to the hub it is allowed to be moved.

Main benefit of warming the wheel: pressure gain or structure temperature?

Brian
hardingfv32
13
 
Joined: 3 Apr 2011

0

Post Fri Jun 15, 2012 11:05 pm

hardingfv32 wrote:I still do not see why it can not be adjusted 'on track'. This is a brake duct, not an aero device. As a brake duct mounted to the hub it is allowed to be moved.


Because it would be moveable aerodynamics.

Scarbs Webpage wrote:As I explained in the article, adjusting by the driver while the car is moving is illegal, it contitutes a moveable aero device.
Come back 747, we miss you!!
Caito
7
 
Joined: 16 Jun 2009
Location: Argentina

0

Post Sat Jun 16, 2012 1:42 am

hardingfv32 wrote:Cable or hydraulic actuated from a remote location. No room for an extra mechanic near the wheel assembly during the pit stop.

I still do not see why it can not be adjusted 'on track'. This is a brake duct, not an aero device. As a brake duct mounted to the hub it is allowed to be moved.

Main benefit of warming the wheel: pressure gain or structure temperature?

Brian



As someone said, the brake ducts are still part of the aerodynamic package of the car, as they are sculpted to help the airflow check ferrari's new brake duct design where it extends over the wheel to smooth airflow, the whole thing is deemed an aerodynamic device, and therefore can only be adjusted when the car is stationary.

I think.


Brakes running too warm: open ducts brakes too cold: close. Major benefit is temperature control.
krisfx
2
 
Joined: 4 Jan 2012

0

Post Sat Jun 16, 2012 11:14 am

strad wrote:Have we discussed this brake heat to the tires adjustment screw? I didn't see any.
What are they on about? Do we know?
I left in the part about the floor for clarification of the flex discussion.

.....


Reportedly after the Chinese grand prix, the governing body ruled that the British team had stepped over the line with its interpretation of the rules regarding flexibility. Scratches had been found underneath the extremes of the front wings, to which McLaren argued that the floor bending was within the allowed tolerances.

“The tolerance is there to account for manufacturing defects,” Charlie Whiting is quoted as saying, after ruling that McLaren’s system deliberately exploited those tolerances.


Auto Motor und Sport said: “The seemingly minor change had major implications for McLaren.”


I m just reading this in the paper mag and I unsterstand it like this, that they kind of pre-bent the teatray 3mm upwards and argued that 3mm was manufact. tolerance and therefore legal. The pre-bend teatray allowed more rake , fw closer to ground etc. New nose was countermeasure to regain downforce.

Paddy Lowe is quoted with: "We understand the tyres to only 30%."

Halleluja!
Last edited by FrukostScones on Sat Jun 16, 2012 11:42 am, edited 2 times in total.
"Results never tell the full picture. You need to take a close look at the story behind those results." raymondu999
FrukostScones
4
User avatar
 
Joined: 25 May 2010
Location: Bonnie's Ranch

0

Post Sat Jun 16, 2012 11:16 am

krisfx wrote:
hardingfv32 wrote:Cable or hydraulic actuated from a remote location. No room for an extra mechanic near the wheel assembly during the pit stop.

I still do not see why it can not be adjusted 'on track'. This is a brake duct, not an aero device. As a brake duct mounted to the hub it is allowed to be moved.

Main benefit of warming the wheel: pressure gain or structure temperature?

Brian



As someone said, the brake ducts are still part of the aerodynamic package of the car, as they are sculpted to help the airflow check ferrari's new brake duct design where it extends over the wheel to smooth airflow, the whole thing is deemed an aerodynamic device, and therefore can only be adjusted when the car is stationary.

I think.


Brakes running too warm: open ducts brakes too cold: close. Major benefit is temperature control.


It appears that the adjustment may be by potentiometer, rather than by a bowden cable. Mclaren also had modified wheels to extract more air into the airstream, in a manner not unlike the Red Bull system. Could this be the reason why they were not used in Monaco and Canada? McLaren were questioning the Red Bull set up, and could not be seen to be operating a similar system??
gilgen
5
 
Joined: 3 Apr 2010

0

Post Sat Jun 16, 2012 5:57 pm

Caito wrote:....Because it would be moveable aerodynamics.


Air ducts around the brakes are considered part of the brake system (11.4). They are a moving system being connected to hubs/suspension. Since we know brake ducts are legal and that movable aero devices are not legal, is it not logical to conclude brake ducts are NOT aero devices?

Is my logic flawed?

Brian
hardingfv32
13
 
Joined: 3 Apr 2011

0

Post Sat Jun 16, 2012 6:00 pm

What is more important or has priority: Controlling the brake system temps or the tire/wheel temps?

Brian
hardingfv32
13
 
Joined: 3 Apr 2011

0

Post Sat Jun 16, 2012 6:18 pm

hardingfv32 wrote:What is more important or has priority: Controlling the brake system temps or the tire/wheel temps?

Brian

Depends on the exact moment, but either way, this gives them more control than most, so it's a win/win.
beelsebob
70
User avatar
 
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Location: Elgin, Scotland

0

Post Sat Jun 16, 2012 11:06 pm

hardingfv32 wrote:
Caito wrote:....Because it would be moveable aerodynamics.


Air ducts around the brakes are considered part of the brake system (11.4). They are a moving system being connected to hubs/suspension. Since we know brake ducts are legal and that movable aero devices are not legal, is it not logical to conclude brake ducts are NOT aero devices?

Is my logic flawed?

Brian



But they would still say (Just my opninion here) it's moveable aerodynamics. So they did with the mass damper and the lotus no-pitch system.
Come back 747, we miss you!!
Caito
7
 
Joined: 16 Jun 2009
Location: Argentina

0

Post Sun Jun 17, 2012 9:04 am

The brake ducts themselves are still fixed in relation to the wheel hub that they are attached to, they aren't moving independently from all other parts of the car. Suspension members, steering arms, and drive shafts are allowed to move; the upright that attaches to the suspension arms is allowed to move; everything else has to be fixed in relation to the part of the car it is attached to.
myurr
13
 
Joined: 20 Mar 2008

0

Post Sun Jun 17, 2012 12:57 pm

hardingfv32 wrote:What is more important or has priority: Controlling the brake system temps or the tire/wheel temps?

Brian

You can control both of them via brake tape quite easily but the McLaren adjustable system is deigned to change the relationship between the two. So I'd say the system is pretty much just for tyre temp.
Owen.C93
16
 
Joined: 24 Jul 2010

0

Post Sun Jun 17, 2012 5:28 pm

myurr wrote:The brake ducts themselves are still fixed in relation to the wheel hub that they are attached to, they aren't moving independently from all other parts of the car.


If we are operating under 3:15, then the above statement is not correct. 3:15 clearly states the any specific part with aero influence must be attached to the rigidly attached to a sprung part of the car.

I do not see what logic the stewards could use to rule that a cooling shroud that can not be adjusted has no aero influence and one that is adjustable does.

Brian
hardingfv32
13
 
Joined: 3 Apr 2011

PreviousNext

Return to Formula One cars

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Froggolo and 10 guests