hardingfv32 wrote:I still do not see why it can not be adjusted 'on track'. This is a brake duct, not an aero device. As a brake duct mounted to the hub it is allowed to be moved.
Scarbs Webpage wrote:As I explained in the article, adjusting by the driver while the car is moving is illegal, it contitutes a moveable aero device.
hardingfv32 wrote:Cable or hydraulic actuated from a remote location. No room for an extra mechanic near the wheel assembly during the pit stop.
I still do not see why it can not be adjusted 'on track'. This is a brake duct, not an aero device. As a brake duct mounted to the hub it is allowed to be moved.
Main benefit of warming the wheel: pressure gain or structure temperature?
Brian
strad wrote:Have we discussed this brake heat to the tires adjustment screw? I didn't see any.
What are they on about? Do we know?
I left in the part about the floor for clarification of the flex discussion.
.....
Reportedly after the Chinese grand prix, the governing body ruled that the British team had stepped over the line with its interpretation of the rules regarding flexibility. Scratches had been found underneath the extremes of the front wings, to which McLaren argued that the floor bending was within the allowed tolerances.
“The tolerance is there to account for manufacturing defects,” Charlie Whiting is quoted as saying, after ruling that McLaren’s system deliberately exploited those tolerances.
Auto Motor und Sport said: “The seemingly minor change had major implications for McLaren.”
krisfx wrote:hardingfv32 wrote:Cable or hydraulic actuated from a remote location. No room for an extra mechanic near the wheel assembly during the pit stop.
I still do not see why it can not be adjusted 'on track'. This is a brake duct, not an aero device. As a brake duct mounted to the hub it is allowed to be moved.
Main benefit of warming the wheel: pressure gain or structure temperature?
Brian
As someone said, the brake ducts are still part of the aerodynamic package of the car, as they are sculpted to help the airflow check ferrari's new brake duct design where it extends over the wheel to smooth airflow, the whole thing is deemed an aerodynamic device, and therefore can only be adjusted when the car is stationary.
I think.
Brakes running too warm: open ducts brakes too cold: close. Major benefit is temperature control.
Caito wrote:....Because it would be moveable aerodynamics.
hardingfv32 wrote:Caito wrote:....Because it would be moveable aerodynamics.
Air ducts around the brakes are considered part of the brake system (11.4). They are a moving system being connected to hubs/suspension. Since we know brake ducts are legal and that movable aero devices are not legal, is it not logical to conclude brake ducts are NOT aero devices?
Is my logic flawed?
Brian
hardingfv32 wrote:What is more important or has priority: Controlling the brake system temps or the tire/wheel temps?
Brian
myurr wrote:The brake ducts themselves are still fixed in relation to the wheel hub that they are attached to, they aren't moving independently from all other parts of the car.
Users browsing this forum: Froggolo and 10 guests