Bernie Ecclestone

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.

Post Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:19 pm

What do people mean, F1 sells itself? Bernie has been instrumental in this:

James Allen

The last 10 years has been a period of great expansion of the business; F1′s revenues have doubled since 2003 from $604 million a year to $1.22 billion while payments made to the teams have gone from $543 million in 2009 to $698 million last year.


Do you think racing in France and Portugal would have produced these numbers?

He's had a big hand in selling F1 to new parts of the world in the last 15 years. Of course mistakes will be made but this is part of laying the foundation for a truly global business, and empty seats at a few races are a small price to pay in the long term. The biggest complaint is probably that the teams should own a much greater share of the business.

I really didn't expect to take this side of the debate, but meh. Debating is fun.
Red Schneider
 
Joined: 17 May 2012
Location: Los Angeles

Post Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:25 pm

If you consider ripping-off taxpayers and fans as "business", sure, the man is a genius.
"Bernoulli is a nine-letter name"
xpensive
 
Joined: 22 Nov 2008

Post Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:44 pm

F1 brings in $1.22 billion and those who do all the work, i.e. the teams, only receive a bit more than half? OK.

$500 million a year is a hell of a lot of money for a glorified middle man, especially when there's no way FOM's overhead is remotely close to even half of that amount.

The good news is that middle men in general are going the way of the dinosaurs, and Ecclestone knows it, too. F1's IPO is the gilded parachute he and CVC will use to gently deposit themselves into the world of the obsolete.
bhallg2k
 
Joined: 28 Feb 2006

Post Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:05 pm

bhallg2k wrote:...
$500 million a year is a hell of a lot of money for a glorified middle man, especially when there's no way FOM's overhead is remotely close to even half of that amount.
...

Makes Don King look like someone working pro bono, doesn't it?
"Bernoulli is a nine-letter name"
xpensive
 
Joined: 22 Nov 2008

Post Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:45 pm

The image of Don King is exactly what popped into my mind.
bhallg2k
 
Joined: 28 Feb 2006

Post Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:51 pm

bhallg2k wrote:The image of Don King is exactly what popped into my mind.

Their respective hairdo is somewhat different, otherwise I guess they might have a few things to talk about?
"Bernoulli is a nine-letter name"
xpensive
 
Joined: 22 Nov 2008

Post Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:59 pm

I imagine them having a nice dinner and then waiting several years in uncomfortable silence for the other to pick up the check. It would be a miserly battle for the ages.

For the sake of balance, what has Ecclestone done that was worthwhile? Seriously.
bhallg2k
 
Joined: 28 Feb 2006

Post Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:18 pm

bhallg2k wrote:I imagine them having a nice dinner and then waiting several years in uncomfortable silence for the other to pick up the check. It would be a miserly battle for the ages.

For the sake of balance, what has Ecclestone done that was worthwhile? Seriously.

Other than abandoning the Brabham team, looting Formula One and loosing half of it to the cr**tian mob, let's see...
"Bernoulli is a nine-letter name"
xpensive
 
Joined: 22 Nov 2008

Post Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:22 pm

bhallg2k wrote:F1 brings in $1.22 billion and those who do all the work, i.e. the teams, only receive a bit more than half? OK.

$500 million a year is a hell of a lot of money for a glorified middle man, especially when there's no way FOM's overhead is remotely close to even half of that amount.

The good news is that middle men in general are going the way of the dinosaurs, and Ecclestone knows it, too. F1's IPO is the gilded parachute he and CVC will use to gently deposit themselves into the world of the obsolete.


But this is more of a beef with CVC than Ecclestone. Of course the teams should receive a greater share. Ecclestone has grown the business. CVC has benefited from it. Is this Ecclestone's fault? Unless I'm missing something, he could have done the same job if the teams owned the lion's share.

As for ripping off taxpayers, I don't see why the salesman should be blamed. No one blames Roger Goodell for what went down in Minnesota recently.
Red Schneider
 
Joined: 17 May 2012
Location: Los Angeles

Post Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:32 pm

You troll of trolls RS :wink: , you know as well as anyone that MrE sold the commercial rights for a number of gigabucks, after Kirsch and what not, to CVC and the poor SOBs have to keep up the revenues only to pay interest on that very purchase?

Crime of the century if you ask me.
"Bernoulli is a nine-letter name"
xpensive
 
Joined: 22 Nov 2008

Post Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:39 pm

Isn't Ecclestone chairman of CVC anyway? Or rather was he chairman before Peter Bruback?
bhallg2k
 
Joined: 28 Feb 2006

Post Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:39 pm

@x

No, I'm not a troll. I'm just ignorant. I don't know the details you speak of. I know he's a wheeler-dealer but to say he has done nothing worthwhile struck me as hyperbole, so I decided to jump in.

You two know more than I in this matter. Fair enough.
Red Schneider
 
Joined: 17 May 2012
Location: Los Angeles

Post Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:50 pm

bhallg2k wrote:Isn't Ecclestone chairman of CVC anyway? Or rather was he chairman before Peter Bruback?


I think he's got a seat on the board, but I don't think he's ever been the headmost honcho.
Pup
 
Joined: 8 May 2008
Location: Under the bed.

Post Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:02 pm

bhallg2k wrote:For the sake of balance, what has Ecclestone done that was worthwhile? Seriously.


Took me a while: he hired Gordon Murray, didn't he?

...and then handed him an Alfa engine. :lol:
Pup
 
Joined: 8 May 2008
Location: Under the bed.

Post Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:05 pm

Wiki is as usual your friend, the way I understand it, MrE is hired by CVC to run certain parts of the business.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CVC_Capital_Partners

@RS: I'm sorry if I got your input wrong, I thought you were trying to raise the debate, nothing wrong with that of course.

@ Pup: Which one of them, the way I understand it, all of Carlo Chiti's creations were individual in every respect?
"Bernoulli is a nine-letter name"
xpensive
 
Joined: 22 Nov 2008

PreviousNext

Return to General chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot], SectorOne and 8 guests