countersteer wrote:I'm fascinated by the in car shots of the McLaren/Ferrari etc. when the driver (whoever it is) is so smooth. Then they show a driver in a Torro Rosso/Spyker and it's all a**holes and elbows. These guys are doing good to keep it on the road. It's not the drivers, it's the chassis. How could some of these backmarker drivers perform in a well sorted chassis? I mean, strap Scott into a Ferrari and how would he do? And how would Felipe do in a Torro Rosso.
mx_tifosi wrote:The rookie drivers that impress the most are those with relativeley poor chassis and still give good results. Thus proving in their early F1 years that even without one of the best chassis on the grid they can still perform.
DaveKillens wrote:mx_tifosi wrote:The rookie drivers that impress the most are those with relativeley poor chassis and still give good results. Thus proving in their early F1 years that even without one of the best chassis on the grid they can still perform.
As in Michael Schumacher and Ayrton Senna? Michael started in a Jordan, while Senna began his F1 career in a Toleman. Then as we all know, they earned rides in more famous marquees.
But I do agree, in a great car just about any F1 caliber driver can look very good. But a great driver can make a crappy chassis appear decent.
BreezyRacer wrote:I'm surprised that no one has mentioned that now that there is no USGP there's no need to keep to keep Speed around .. sad but fairly true.
BreezyRacer wrote:I'm surprised that no one has mentioned that now that there is no USGP there's no need to keep to keep Speed around .. sad but fairly true.
ginsu wrote: I think Scott Speed has done well enough to keep his drive, and he has really matured.
Users browsing this forum: Twitter [Bot], Yandex [Bot] and 8 guests