Circuit Rating

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.

Post Wed Jan 23, 2008 6:36 pm

guys can someone give me the info regarding the rating of circuits according to downforce...or atleast the highest,lowest and mid range downforce circuits
kalyangoparaju
 
Joined: 6 Jan 2008

Post Wed Jan 23, 2008 6:59 pm

Downforce set up

Very High downforce
Monaco
Hungary - Hungaroring

High downforce
Australia – Melbourne
San Marino – Imola
China – Sanghai
Brazil - Interlagos

Medium downforce
Bahrain - Sakhir
Malaysia – Sepang
Europe – Nurburgring
Spain – Barcelona
G. Britain – Silverstone
France – Magny Cours
Germany – Hockenheim
Turkey – Istanbull
Japan - Fuji

Low Downforce
Canada – G. Villeneuve
U.S.A. – Indianapolis
Belgium - Spa

Very low downforce
Italy - Monza
Future is like walking into past......

Blog : http://formula1techandart.wordpress.com/
Twitter :http://twitter.com/bar555onF1
bar555
 
Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Location: Greece - Athens

Post Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:41 pm

not to sure spa is low downforce track. medium i would say.
SoundMan
 
Joined: 8 Jan 2008
Location: UK

Post Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:19 pm

SoundMan wrote:not to sure spa is low downforce track. medium i would say.


The long straights meant that most teams used low downforce setups, with only some leaning towards medium setups.


Also, Fuji was also a rather low-downforce setup - just not this year in the rain.
Metar
 
Joined: 23 Jan 2008

Post Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:51 pm

:cry: :cry: :cry: remember when hockenheim was on the last category ... :cry: :cry: :cry:
"You need great passion, because everything you do with great pleasure, you do well." -Juan Manuel Fangio

"I have no idols. I admire work, dedication and competence." -Ayrton Senna
Belatti
 
Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Location: Argentina

Post Thu Jan 24, 2008 6:04 pm

I also think Fuji would need similar downforce level as indianapolis, being a half straight / half twisty track too. But indy has no quick turn (appart for the banked one), and Fuji has turn 4, which is taken at approx. 260km/h. This one needs reasonable DF level I'd say.

I'd say Bahrein and Spa are on the very low side of the "medium downforce list", while Hockenheim and Magny-cours are on the top, in terms of DF demands.
vyselegend
 
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Location: Paris, France

Post Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:01 pm

The banked turn is taken flat-out with far less downforce anyway, so it's inexistent when downforce is considered.

At the same time, the faster corner at Fuji, I suspect, while obviously a consideration, shouldn't be much of a problem either, considering it's still a 1.5km straight we're looking at...
Metar
 
Joined: 23 Jan 2008

Post Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:14 pm

and Valencia will be the next very high down force circuit as it appears to have almost no straight! I guess singapore will be high/medium???
meves
 
Joined: 22 Oct 2007

Post Thu Jan 24, 2008 8:50 pm

meves wrote:and Valencia will be the next very high down force circuit as it appears to have almost no straight! I guess singapore will be high/medium???


Yes, the circuit's resemblance to Monaco is striking - and it's even set near a marina as well!

Image
Image
Metar
 
Joined: 23 Jan 2008

Post Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:54 pm

Metar wrote:Yes, the circuit's resemblance to Monaco is striking - and it's even set near a marina as well!


I had the same reaction first, but, as discussed on the Valencia-the track thread, the track is much wider and straights seems longer too.
vyselegend
 
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Location: Paris, France

Post Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:25 am

The Valencia track is a fair bit longer than Monaco I believe, and definately wider. So when comparing the track layouts you should scale up the Valencia track-map, like this:

Image

As usual, I could of course be completely wrong. :)
Roland Ehnström
 
Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Location: Norrtälje, Sweden


Return to Aerodynamics, chassis and tyres

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 4 guests