That is your opinion not McLaren's official stance.
Officially Eric said Honda needs to make a big step.
This is engeering, it takes times but You fix things 1 at a time and you keep moving forward.
That is your opinion not McLaren's official stance.
Can't remember but most of them were running low downforce on Friday so the top speed would have been more anyway.Ganxxta wrote: ↑25 Jun 2017, 03:40I just found a nice comparison of Qualifying speeds, so all should be at full power:
Vandoorne: 330,3 kph
Alonso: 327,9 kph
Ricciardo: 356,3 kph (its a "weak" Renault)
http://www.motorsport-magazin.com/forme ... aus-in-q1/
(its german, use google translate)
So how fast was Alonso again with the new PU on Friday, does someone still have an overview?
Alonso after Q1:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxoWU4SGbug
They can move to merc PU but results will not be too different. It could be different this season but you know they are using Honda PU
There is one MAJOR mistake here... They took out the upgraded engine afte FP2.. Alonso ran an old engine in qually.Ganxxta wrote: ↑25 Jun 2017, 03:40I just found a nice comparison of Qualifying speeds, so all should be at full power:
Vandoorne: 330,3 kph
Alonso: 327,9 kph
Ricciardo: 356,3 kph (its a "weak" Renault)
http://www.motorsport-magazin.com/forme ... aus-in-q1/
(its german, use google translate)
So how fast was Alonso again with the new PU on Friday, does someone still have an overview?
Alonso after Q1:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxoWU4SGbug
3 sec gap and the new upgrade COULD be worth 0,3 sec. Fantastic job!vantage87 wrote: ↑25 Jun 2017, 10:25Honda: 'Spec 3' engine could be worth 0.3s
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/hond ... hs-922976/
Avocado wrote: ↑25 Jun 2017, 11:103 sec gap and the new upgrade COULD be worth 0,3 sec. Fantastic job!vantage87 wrote: ↑25 Jun 2017, 10:25Honda: 'Spec 3' engine could be worth 0.3s
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/hond ... hs-922976/