My point goes into the direction that you can watch Mercedes and see, how important it is to develop the PU with the car around it. I know that McLaren and Honda cannot or won't do the same thing as Mercedes. But you cannot know how the PU works in your car, when it works fine in a Sauber. I see so many irks and quirks in this idea.
They can easily test how powerful the engine is, so development isn't a problem. When it's good enough there is more than enough time to integrate the engine in the design.marvin78 wrote: ↑26 Jun 2017, 15:43My point goes into the direction that you can watch Mercedes and see, how important it is to develop the PU with the car around it. I know that McLaren and Honda cannot or won't do the same thing as Mercedes. But you cannot know how the PU works in your car, when it works fine in a Sauber. I see so many irks and quirks in this idea.
BTW: I don't see the point of having Alonso in the car either. I don't even know if it helps the development to have someone like him if you are at the end of the field. It would be another thing if testing was allowed like in the 90s.
For sure.Andres125sx wrote: ↑26 Jun 2017, 17:12I think that would have been a great strategy three seasons ago, but not now when Honda is finally solving their problems. If signing Honda was a mistake, quitting now would be another one, maybe even bigger
Alonso's data doesn't count for much here, towards the end of the race he was doing slow/recharge laps, followed by a fast lap, so not actual race pace.HPD wrote: ↑26 Jun 2017, 19:54https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DDLeXNKXoAAiLGJ.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DDLeWNYXsAIXoIG.jpg
So, you are saying that without towing effect, only on rechargeable lap, he is capable to produce 350 km/h? Now, look at the qualification speed of Alonso, where the slow/recharge laps are norm: http://www.fia.com/events/fia-formula-o ... ication-30daren_p wrote: ↑26 Jun 2017, 20:19Alonso's data doesn't count for much here, towards the end of the race he was doing slow/recharge laps, followed by a fast lap, so not actual race pace.HPD wrote: ↑26 Jun 2017, 19:54https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DDLeXNKXoAAiLGJ.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DDLeWNYXsAIXoIG.jpg
Doesn't the qualifying data look a bit strange? Stoff is 18 across the board where as Alonso is 15,4,19, one would think they would typically be in the same ballpark as each other, possibly running different mapping from each other during qualifying?j.yank wrote: ↑26 Jun 2017, 21:14So, you are saying that without towing effect, only on rechargeable lap, he is capable to produce 350 km/h? Now, look at the qualification speed of Alonso, where the slow/recharge laps are norm: http://www.fia.com/events/fia-formula-o ... ication-30daren_p wrote: ↑26 Jun 2017, 20:19Alonso's data doesn't count for much here, towards the end of the race he was doing slow/recharge laps, followed by a fast lap, so not actual race pace.HPD wrote: ↑26 Jun 2017, 19:54https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DDLeXNKXoAAiLGJ.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DDLeWNYXsAIXoIG.jpg
Understandable, yes drivers do make a difference but the data seems too random here for that to be the case. If they were using the same setup/car, you would just expect the better driver to be a bit faster in each speed trap, but this isn't the case here.BrunoH wrote: ↑26 Jun 2017, 22:43no.. its like having Ayrton Senna in the car.. these kind of drivers are able to get up to 3/4 of a second against the standard f1 driver... thats what they are worth... and that in development money invested is a lot.. so the trade-off is a good one.
remember ayrton putting over 1.5 seconds in Monaco against Alain in the same car... !?
wow....did you see that interview ???? it was all kind of tongue-in-cheek.etusch wrote: ↑26 Jun 2017, 14:26On paper it’s a good strategy,” team boss Eric Boullier told Britain’s Sky.
“If you can run a (different) engine for the time being until Honda is competitive, then why not? This is one of the various scenarios we may have considered,” he added.
Mercedes’ Toto Wolff said in Baku that the issue of McLaren’s 2018 engine supplier needs to be resolved by around the end of the summer.
Boullier admitted the decision is “a question of weeks” away.
Gptoday's news
I think everyone should know that recharging cycle is a normal process, even Stroll is being passed on the Last lap because he is not recharge it before. You cant go full power every time you want, it is normal. And it is ensure that the spec 2 is not 100hp behind. I think spec 3 will put honda just 40hp behind Merc, as same as renault now.daren_p wrote: ↑26 Jun 2017, 20:19Alonso's data doesn't count for much here, towards the end of the race he was doing slow/recharge laps, followed by a fast lap, so not actual race pace.HPD wrote: ↑26 Jun 2017, 19:54https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DDLeXNKXoAAiLGJ.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DDLeWNYXsAIXoIG.jpg