Renault R31

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
luca
luca
0
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 00:36

Re: Renault R31

Post

kilcoo316 wrote:Of course, if you do introduce exhaust gases so far upstream of your rear tyres, you need to be very careful the plume does not spread so much as to "boil" the tyres. That is not something that would be apparent in a windtunnel, and given the known limitations of 2 eqn turbulence models and jets, not something that I would feel comfortable relying solely on CFD for. But I'm quite sure Renault would have considered all that (if they did go with a weird location)...
That's exactly what I was thinking.

SLC
SLC
0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 11:15

Re: Renault R31

Post

The exhaust gases would not be pointing fowards (as in, against the direction of motion) - this just doesn't make any sense.

And CFD analysis would be good enough to make sure the tyres don't melt! :)

kilcoo316
kilcoo316
21
Joined: 09 Mar 2005, 16:45
Location: Kilcoo, Ireland

Re: Renault R31

Post

SLC wrote:And CFD analysis would be good enough to make sure the tyres don't melt! :)
To be honest, I don't think it would be... not with all the transient behaviour going on in the "freestream".

If you look at the accuracy of CFD sims of jets into cross-flows, they are ok... nothing more (google it, there should be a load of papers about on it, its a popular test of numerics).

What is happening in an F1 car, under say braking, is so much more complex.

SLC
SLC
0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 11:15

Re: Renault R31

Post

kilcoo316 wrote:
SLC wrote:And CFD analysis would be good enough to make sure the tyres don't melt! :)
To be honest, I don't think it would be... not with all the transient behaviour going on in the "freestream".

If you look at the accuracy of CFD sims of jets into cross-flows, they are ok... nothing more (google it, there should be a load of papers about on it, its a popular test of numerics).

What is happening in an F1 car, under say braking, is so much more complex.
It is accurate enough, I've done it :) Granted, the simulation may not have been perfect, but the work ensured that no bodywork nor rubber overheated.

User avatar
Tim.Wright
330
Joined: 13 Feb 2009, 06:29

Re: Renault R31

Post

manchild wrote:The material on splitter is definitely for protection from heat. Perhaps they've presented only blank cover with no outlets at all?
That material on the splitter is just kevlar in the laminate. Its quite common for teams to use carbon kevlar on parts susceptible to stone/debris damage since its a tougher material than carbon. Have a look on the little flaps on the Ferrari under the wishbones.

Its definately not heat protection in itself.

Tim
Not the engineer at Force India

User avatar
horse
6
Joined: 23 Oct 2009, 17:53
Location: Bilbao, ES

Re: Renault R31

Post

ringo wrote:I think the concept is counter productive. Blowing upstream should only be done on top of the floor. If it's bellow the heat wont be good for the car and the high pressure coming out the engine can cause the floor to lift. Blowing high pressure turbulent air underneath the car can't be good.
But hot air, in itself, is at lower pressure than atmospheric, so it should improve the efficiency of the floor if hot air were to flow underneath.
ringo wrote:It only works in a diffuser throat, downstream, becuase of the ejector principle.
What is the ejector principle? Surely just exciting the air forward of the diffuser opening will get the same positive effects as blowing directly into the diffuser.
"Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words." - Chuang Tzu

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
550
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Renault R31

Post

I still think pointing the exhaust forward on THIS PARTCULAR car is BS! There are some tricks that you can do with it as kilcoo said. But, Insulated or not I cannot imagine 2 red-hot 900 degree Celsius three inch pipes sandwiching the driver's thighs in that space.

Then there is the hole, why is it square? That is a poor shape for that purpose.
Square holes produces turbulence. This is one of the basic things you learn about ducts in fluid dynamics or HVAC.

@horse..

Hot doesn't mean low pressure.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bcArT6T ... re=related[/youtube]

An F1 car is doing this on a smaller scale. So you will literally be pushing the car backwards with the exhaust.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

User avatar
dren
226
Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 14:14

Re: Renault R31

Post

I am expecting a very trick EBD once the team fits the exhaust for the first test. I don't think it is routed to the front of the car.
Honda!

n_anirudh
n_anirudh
28
Joined: 25 Jul 2008, 02:43

Re: Renault R31

Post

The beam wing is split in the central section as a 2 element airfoil. Wondering if this is legal as its in the central section?

Image

And a fairly large number of slits 6 on the rear wing
Image

User avatar
horse
6
Joined: 23 Oct 2009, 17:53
Location: Bilbao, ES

Re: Renault R31

Post

n smikle wrote:@horse..

Hot doesn't mean low pressure.

An F1 car is doing this on a smaller scale. So you will literally be pushing the car backwards with the exhaust.
Aye, granted. But what about once the gases have escaped/mixed a bit? Would they still be at high pressure? And if you exited sideways would this not balance on either side?

(I'm struggling to believe it's true, by the way, but I'm interested in testing the hypothesis)
Last edited by horse on 01 Feb 2011, 02:15, edited 1 time in total.
"Words are for meaning: when you've got the meaning, you can forget the words." - Chuang Tzu

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Renault R31

Post

Scarbs seems to think there may be some exhaust being routed to the front of the car, personally I think this sounds very far fetched but he's usually right about these things. :|
"In downforce we trust"

manchild
manchild
12
Joined: 03 Jun 2005, 10:54

Re: Renault R31

Post

Perhaps they use exhaust(s) positioned at the front as virtual skirts?

I mean, since volume and speed and exhaust gasses is mush faster than speed of car, perhaps the gasses could prevent spilling of airstream sideways? Having them spilled sideways would be no loss since they need to go somewhere anyway, and if they could at least partially seal the space between stepped floor and the longitudinal outline of the floor (at least at the beginning of the floor), than the air traveling below the floor would be less spilled, right?

I mean like these small vertical fins on top of airplane wing that serve for same purpose, only "virtual" since floor must be skirt-less, flat that is.

Image

User avatar
scuderiafan
11
Joined: 06 Nov 2010, 15:14
Location: United States

Re: Renault R31

Post

I noticed that little piece in the center of the rear wing, has someone gone over that?
"You're so angry that you throw your gloves down, and the worst part is; you have to pick them up again." - Steve Matchett

Patiently waiting...

FerFa
FerFa
0
Joined: 01 Feb 2011, 04:23

Re: Renault R31

Post

...should be the connection for the wing switch, no?

My theory about the front exhaust is, that we only can see air inlets, but not the exhaust outlets. The exhaust outlets will be under the car. With increasing speed the air pressure into the angular inlets increases. This leads to a somehow different stream of the exhaust air trough under-body and diffusor. This is a "F-duct like exhaust stream bender", creating more down-force on the rear suspension at high exhaust pressure but low speed and less at high speed with low exhaust pressure.

Brilliant...

mx_tifoso
mx_tifoso
0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 05:01
Location: North America

Re: Renault R31

Post

SLC wrote:
mx_tifosi wrote:
manchild wrote:
BTW, these calipers seam unusual, as they seam to cover almost 50% of the disc.

[img]http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/5476/new14c.jpg[img]
The calipers are surrounded by cf molding, as per the usual brake system cover but just extended out that far. IMO.
They are coolings ducts which bring air from the drum plenum on the inboard side of the disc out and over the disc onto the outboard side of the caliper.
Right on, I should have specified more. Thanks for adding to my bit though.

kilcoo316 wrote:
Why is the caliper not at the bottom? :?
Maybe worth your while:
F1T - Position of a caliper
Forum guide: read before posting

"You do it, then it's done." - Kimi Räikkönen

Por las buenas soy amigo, por las malas soy campeón.