Real merc logo on the MGP W02?

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.

Post Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:04 pm

I've been trying to get good pics for awhile of this, but yes the nose cone logo really isn't a sticker. Mercedes, eh?


Image

Image

Image
King Six
 
Joined: 27 May 2008
Location: London, England

Post Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:17 pm

"Clouds now and again
give a soul some respite from
moon-gazing-behold."

Matsuo Basho
Leon
 
Joined: 23 Feb 2011
Location: Armenia

Post Mon Mar 28, 2011 6:07 pm

King Six -> The logo is painted on, it's just a 3D illusion (again!!! after all the asymmetry stuff!). It's hard to notice at first, but the light always seem to shine from the same angle on the logo (top left when you look straight at the nose of the car), as opposed to the light on the nosecone. Merc has a hell of an airbrush artist on their team!

Macxtor -> Mercedes are starting to experiment with the bending wing, and the one they used in Australia was bending to some extent (although nowhere close to the amount on the Red Bull or the McLaren).

Although the rules are not enforced at the moment due to an inadequate FIA test, the Red Bull and McLaren wings are illegal. Mercedes might not be willing to put a lot of money and work hours developing something that might be useless in a couple of races if the FIA updates their test.

Ross Brawn should be familiar with the concept of flexing bodywork, since it was his technical team that introduced it back when he was technical director at Ferrari. They had bending fins on the engine cover which flattened out at high speed to reduce drag, and then used something similar on their rear wing. But it seems the FIA reacted much more quickly back then to ban the technology.
bot6
 
Joined: 2 Mar 2011

Post Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:58 am

bot6 wrote:King Six -> The logo is painted on, it's just a 3D illusion (again!!! after all the asymmetry stuff!). It's hard to notice at first, but the light always seem to shine from the same angle on the logo (top left when you look straight at the nose of the car), as opposed to the light on the nosecone. Merc has a hell of an airbrush artist on their team!


I don't think so. In this picture the reflection of the fluorescent lights would go straight over an airbrushed logo.
Image
tok-tokkie
 
Joined: 8 Jun 2009
Location: Cape Town

Post Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:18 am

Depends on the varnish you use and its reflection / refraction angle.

Look at the Syntium logo just above, it also doesn't reflect the neon lights, and nobody thinks it's 3D.
bot6
 
Joined: 2 Mar 2011

Post Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:31 am

It is a real piece. Wether it´s metal or simply a thick sticker i can´t tell but it´s not an airbrush. The shadows are airbrushed anyway.
Image
Image
Image
Image
The truth will come out...
HampusA
 
Joined: 16 Feb 2011

Post Tue Mar 29, 2011 2:11 pm

It's obviously designed as an aerodynamic benefit to create two counter-rotating vortices along the edges of the nose, similar to side skirts to trap that air and redirect it more efficiently along a lower-drag path.
volarchico
 
Joined: 26 Feb 2010

Post Tue Mar 29, 2011 2:14 pm

thats the new tachyon flux generator and it works n conjunction with the KERS.
Its this device that overloaded the KERS.
Raptor22
 
Joined: 7 Apr 2009

Post Tue Mar 29, 2011 2:16 pm

volarchico wrote:It's obviously designed as an aerodynamic benefit to create two counter-rotating vortices along the edges of the nose, similar to side skirts to trap that air and redirect it more efficiently along a lower-drag path.


I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or being honest :shock:
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

Post Tue Mar 29, 2011 2:18 pm

raymondu999 wrote:I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or being honest :shock:

Not the first time I've been accused of VERY dry humor (to the point no one knows if I'm serious or not)... :wink:
volarchico
 
Joined: 26 Feb 2010

Post Tue May 17, 2011 2:38 pm

I'm sure it isn't a sticker, even at one of the races recently the camera angle showed it to be embossed/sticking out abit. Even that first picture I posted, follow the contours and you can see it's sticking out. :S

I still think it's not a sticker but an actual thing on the car!
King Six
 
Joined: 27 May 2008
Location: London, England

Post Tue May 17, 2011 4:35 pm

I don't know about you; but I HAVE seen in the past such "thick" stickers that look like that. Not saying this is one though.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法
raymondu999
 
Joined: 4 Feb 2010

Post Tue May 17, 2011 4:41 pm

King Six wrote:I'm sure it isn't a sticker, even at one of the races recently the camera angle showed it to be embossed/sticking out abit. Even that first picture I posted, follow the contours and you can see it's sticking out. :S

I still think it's not a sticker but an actual thing on the car!


You could be right. I too thought it was just a sticker or an airbrush until very recently when I saw a pic of the Ferrari logo in the nosecone. I realized the Fezza one is not a sticker, you can clearly see its embedded into the nose cone somehow. (Is this the right word? What I mean is that you can see there is a little cavity where the logo sits. It is very apparent in the edges of the red paint.) That picture made me wonder again about the Merc one...

Am still undecided...
Jon
 
Joined: 27 Aug 2008

Post Tue May 17, 2011 4:50 pm

Its a real logo people, a black version is airbrushed underneath it and then the actual emblem is put on top. The car really is beautiful though.
Byronrhys
 
Joined: 9 Aug 2010

Post Tue May 17, 2011 6:01 pm

You would think the pictures with lines showing the logo sticking out or the redflections would be enough.. Guess not.
The truth will come out...
HampusA
 
Joined: 16 Feb 2011

Next

Return to General chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 7 guests