Which One is Fastest?

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
Jolle
Jolle
132
Joined: 29 Jan 2014, 22:58
Location: Dordrecht

Re: Which One is Fastest?

Post

Andres125sx wrote:
24 May 2019, 07:59
Jolle wrote:
23 May 2019, 22:40
pole 2015 (first year): 53.5, fastest lap in the race: 55.2
pole 2019 (gen2 car): 53.3 fastest lap in the race: 52.3 (probably because of the Mario Kart rules)
False, pole in 2019 was 50.0
Indeed, Wikipedia has the wrong times. But still far off 7 seconds.

gibells
gibells
3
Joined: 08 Apr 2009, 16:23
Location: Andalucia, Spain

Re: Which One is Fastest?

Post

Despite is my misgivings about going electric, I do think that racing is a fantastic way to develop battery tech and drivetrains. What no-one is mentioning is that the Gen2 cars are able to go the entire race distance, rather than embarrassingly changing cars halfway through ala Gen1.

Give them time and they will make even more strides.

All this talk about series hate makes out like you can only support one franchise. Reality is if you're on F1T you love and watch it all.

Jolle
Jolle
132
Joined: 29 Jan 2014, 22:58
Location: Dordrecht

Re: Which One is Fastest?

Post

gibells wrote:
24 May 2019, 09:27
Despite is my misgivings about going electric, I do think that racing is a fantastic way to develop battery tech and drivetrains. What no-one is mentioning is that the Gen2 cars are able to go the entire race distance, rather than embarrassingly changing cars halfway through ala Gen1.

Give them time and they will make even more strides.

All this talk about series hate makes out like you can only support one franchise. Reality is if you're on F1T you love and watch it all.
Oh I love electric racing. I was astonished when I tested a race Tesla roadster years ago (I supplied electric mopeds to the Zandvoort circuit and a lot of racing teams and my company sponsored a car in the diesel cup), the throttle response was by far the best of any race car I drove and I follow the electric TT motor racing.

And Formula E is innovating, but for me not really on the technical side but a new way to market racing. The electric power makes it possible to go places where no races could be held and proven itself to be the main competitor for the WEC series and DTM for car manufacturers to put up a show. But, on the technical side, it’s a spec series so there are no investments from for instance battery manufacturers to come with better tech or new developments. It’s all locked in tenders.

joshuagore
joshuagore
0
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 04:01

Re: Which One is Fastest?

Post

Jolle wrote:
23 May 2019, 18:16
Andres125sx wrote:
23 May 2019, 17:49
Jolle wrote:
22 May 2019, 17:45

Performance wise Formula E is actually quite pathetic. 200kW in race trim with 900 kg of mass, that’s not far off reasonably priced road cars. The only reason it looks good on track because of the narrow short road courses and the very hard tires, which makes it look like they race on ice.
So any series wich is not extremelly fast is pathetic and cannot look good at any track? #-o

Formula Ford is pathetic? WTCC is pathetic?

Sorry Jolle, but your bias is too obvious
You downvoted me because my analysis isn’t accurate? Which part?
We can all imagine an all electric f1 car that beats the ICE but it would last 4 laps and be a time attack(have not done the math on this, just a guesstimate), or some kinda sprint. There are limits on wh/kg with batteries, hard to beat gasoline in the 4 wheel form factor. Checkout Isle of Man electric, that may be a better form factor to showcase the direct comparison. Electric is awesome can it can be anywhere...it motivated me to get into ebikes, dirtbikes get kicked out of the spare lot because of noise.

gibells
gibells
3
Joined: 08 Apr 2009, 16:23
Location: Andalucia, Spain

Re: Which One is Fastest?

Post

Jolle wrote:
24 May 2019, 09:58
gibells wrote:
24 May 2019, 09:27
Despite is my misgivings about going electric, I do think that racing is a fantastic way to develop battery tech and drivetrains. What no-one is mentioning is that the Gen2 cars are able to go the entire race distance, rather than embarrassingly changing cars halfway through ala Gen1.

Give them time and they will make even more strides.

All this talk about series hate makes out like you can only support one franchise. Reality is if you're on F1T you love and watch it all.
Oh I love electric racing. I was astonished when I tested a race Tesla roadster years ago (I supplied electric mopeds to the Zandvoort circuit and a lot of racing teams and my company sponsored a car in the diesel cup), the throttle response was by far the best of any race car I drove and I follow the electric TT motor racing.

And Formula E is innovating, but for me not really on the technical side but a new way to market racing. The electric power makes it possible to go places where no races could be held and proven itself to be the main competitor for the WEC series and DTM for car manufacturers to put up a show. But, on the technical side, it’s a spec series so there are no investments from for instance battery manufacturers to come with better tech or new developments. It’s all locked in tenders.
I've been corrected by Mark Priestley on his blog before. Whilst the batteries and chassis are spec, everything behind that, i.e. powertrain, is open to team design. The feeling I get is that this opening up will extend forward in the future. Besides, based on previous discussions of weight, power & aero etc, it's a bit of a waste of money to prototype other elements until aero really comes into play.

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Which One is Fastest?

Post

Jolle wrote:
24 May 2019, 09:58
gibells wrote:
24 May 2019, 09:27
Despite is my misgivings about going electric, I do think that racing is a fantastic way to develop battery tech and drivetrains. What no-one is mentioning is that the Gen2 cars are able to go the entire race distance, rather than embarrassingly changing cars halfway through ala Gen1.

Give them time and they will make even more strides.

All this talk about series hate makes out like you can only support one franchise. Reality is if you're on F1T you love and watch it all.
Oh I love electric racing. I was astonished when I tested a race Tesla roadster years ago (I supplied electric mopeds to the Zandvoort circuit and a lot of racing teams and my company sponsored a car in the diesel cup), the throttle response was by far the best of any race car I drove and I follow the electric TT motor racing.

And Formula E is innovating, but for me not really on the technical side but a new way to market racing. The electric power makes it possible to go places where no races could be held and proven itself to be the main competitor for the WEC series and DTM for car manufacturers to put up a show. But, on the technical side, it’s a spec series so there are no investments from for instance battery manufacturers to come with better tech or new developments. It’s all locked in tenders.
So far

The idea with FE as they´ve explained theirselves is to first consolidate the series, then open up development step by step. Freedom to develop means huge budgets, but manufacturers and teams must be sure the series will have a future and their investments will be worth before building a big team, and on a new series they can´t, so I think the strategy was perfect, at first start spec so budgets are very small and manufacturers can join easily, then once the series is consolidated start opening up areas to develop, the investment will increase rationally and the series will grow up

First season it was 100% spec, in next seasons they opened up gearbox development. Some cars were single gear, some had two, some more. I´m not the best person to explain as I didn´t follow first seasons closely, but I think there´s some other part wich was unlocked as well.

Batteries not yet, but even so they´ve improved it quite a bit. Now they last double distance while provinding more peak power (25%), and can´t remind the numbers but the weight was far from double the previous one.

I´m still wondering if they just improved same technology or if it´s some of the new LiS or whatever :?:

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Which One is Fastest?

Post

Jolle wrote:
24 May 2019, 08:19
Andres125sx wrote:
24 May 2019, 07:59
Jolle wrote:
23 May 2019, 22:40
pole 2015 (first year): 53.5, fastest lap in the race: 55.2
pole 2019 (gen2 car): 53.3 fastest lap in the race: 52.3 (probably because of the Mario Kart rules)
False, pole in 2019 was 50.0
Indeed, Wikipedia has the wrong times. But still far off 7 seconds.
Yes watching the video again it looks like race laps, so we can´t know if some of them was saving more energy that the other one increasing the gap. Anycase 3.5 seconds is still a huge improvement on a 50 seconds lap, it will be more than 7 seconds on any traditional track :mrgreen:

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Which One is Fastest?

Post

Ok going to YT the description explains the laps are from FP1, but still we can´t know if they were using same power

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Which One is Fastest?

Post

Interesting video showing power train differences between teams from season 2 wich was opened up, and changes from season 2 to season 3


User avatar
NathanOlder
48
Joined: 02 Mar 2012, 10:05
Location: Kent

Re: Which One is Fastest?

Post

Andres125sx wrote:
24 May 2019, 18:41
Jolle wrote:
24 May 2019, 08:19
Andres125sx wrote:
24 May 2019, 07:59


False, pole in 2019 was 50.0
Indeed, Wikipedia has the wrong times. But still far off 7 seconds.
Yes watching the video again it looks like race laps, so we can´t know if some of them was saving more energy that the other one increasing the gap. Anycase 3.5 seconds is still a huge improvement on a 50 seconds lap, it will be more than 7 seconds on any traditional track :mrgreen:
It probably would be about 7 seconds on any traditional track, but they wont go there yet as they will be doing 7 laps before they run out of juice and doing 7 minute laps around Spa :lol:
GoLandoGo
Lewis v2.0
King George has arrived.

New found love for GT racing with Assetto Corsa Competizione on PS5 & PC

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Which One is Fastest?

Post

NathanOlder wrote:
29 May 2019, 21:45
Andres125sx wrote:
24 May 2019, 18:41
Jolle wrote:
24 May 2019, 08:19


Indeed, Wikipedia has the wrong times. But still far off 7 seconds.
Yes watching the video again it looks like race laps, so we can´t know if some of them was saving more energy that the other one increasing the gap. Anycase 3.5 seconds is still a huge improvement on a 50 seconds lap, it will be more than 7 seconds on any traditional track :mrgreen:
It probably would be about 7 seconds on any traditional track, but they wont go there yet as they will be doing 7 laps before they run out of juice and doing 7 minute laps around Spa :lol:
45 minutes of battery in your opinion would provide juice for 7 laps? I see maths are not your field Nathan :mrgreen:


I´ve been trying to compare min speed though a corner, and I was able in Monaco, finally!

At corner 13, the left-right hand chicane before the pool, FE was doing around 165km/h, F1 235km/h

That may look as a extremelly big difference, but that´s pretty normal between F1 and any other category


Anyone have seen any other race in the weekend in Monaco to compare maybe with porsche cup?

User avatar
NathanOlder
48
Joined: 02 Mar 2012, 10:05
Location: Kent

Re: Which One is Fastest?

Post

Andres125sx wrote:
30 May 2019, 07:45
NathanOlder wrote:
29 May 2019, 21:45
Andres125sx wrote:
24 May 2019, 18:41


Yes watching the video again it looks like race laps, so we can´t know if some of them was saving more energy that the other one increasing the gap. Anycase 3.5 seconds is still a huge improvement on a 50 seconds lap, it will be more than 7 seconds on any traditional track :mrgreen:
It probably would be about 7 seconds on any traditional track, but they wont go there yet as they will be doing 7 laps before they run out of juice and doing 7 minute laps around Spa :lol:
45 minutes of battery in your opinion would provide juice for 7 laps? I see maths are not your field Nathan :mrgreen:
And I see you have not even a fraction of the intelligence you are trying yo have us believe.

Try work this one out. If a battery lasts 45 minutes (as you point out), and you are lapping at 7mins per lap (as I mentioned) . Have a wild random guess as to what lap you will run out of juice buddy :wink: :lol:
GoLandoGo
Lewis v2.0
King George has arrived.

New found love for GT racing with Assetto Corsa Competizione on PS5 & PC

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: Which One is Fastest?

Post

Sorry, I didn´t take your 7 minutes per lap seriously, you were serious with that? #-o

User avatar
Phil
66
Joined: 25 Sep 2012, 16:22

Re: Which One is Fastest?

Post

Energy conservation is a huge deal in FE. On top of that, most tracks are flat and short. If they were to do a lap around Spa with those rather big altitude changes, my guess is they indeed wouldn't be able to do many laps before, yes, running out of juice.
Not for nothing, Rosberg's Championship is the only thing that lends credibility to Hamilton's recent success. Otherwise, he'd just be the guy who's had the best car. — bhall II
#Team44 supporter

Pingguest
Pingguest
3
Joined: 28 Dec 2008, 16:31

Re: Which One is Fastest?

Post

Does anyone know how much downforce a Formula E-car generates?