2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
j.yank
j.yank
24
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 13:45

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

Andres125sx wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 09:57
j.yank wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 09:34
So, being PP a long time trainee of Newey doesn't guarantee that he is capable as him
So there´s only two options, being as good as Newey, or being completely useless...

Sincerely j.yank, reading your posts it looks like you think your aero knownledge can be compared with Prodomou knowlege... is that the case?
Is it so hard to understand the difference between knowledge (science) and talent (craft)? And please, give me a break, I don't compare myself with PP, I compare Newey with PP. I will not say that PP is completely useless (these are your words). I am just saying from what we see that PP hasn't achieved the craftsman of Newey. I think this is normal - we are not equal in everything - in any filed of life someone is better than the rest. If you think that PP must be equal to Newey this is your problem.

OviJohn
OviJohn
16
Joined: 24 Jun 2015, 09:21

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

j.yank wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 10:35
Andres125sx wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 09:57
j.yank wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 09:34
So, being PP a long time trainee of Newey doesn't guarantee that he is capable as him
So there´s only two options, being as good as Newey, or being completely useless...

Sincerely j.yank, reading your posts it looks like you think your aero knownledge can be compared with Prodomou knowlege... is that the case?
Is it so hard to understand the difference between knowledge (science) and talent (craft)? And please, give me a break, I don't compare myself with PP, I compare Newey with PP. I will not say that PP is completely useless (these are your words). I am just saying from what we see that PP hasn't achieved the craftsman of Newey. I think this is normal - we are not equal in everything - in any filed of life someone is better than the rest. If you think that PP must be equal to Newey this is your problem.

So please tell us here how on earth is it humanly possible for Peter Prod to achieve anything decent when his team has to design according to figures NOT delivered by his PU counterpart?! Please, I mean seriously guys, is it that hard to understand the relation between chassis design and manufacturing with PU size, weight, cooling needs, AND power figures?!

When Mclaren made its decision to leave the partnership, it wasn't just Alonso or the alleged 100M, it was also key staff like Mr. Prod that could have abandon ship precisely due to that perception you just pointed out. Peter Prod left Newey/RBR to a head position at a team like Mclaren to actually prove his work and craftsmanship. Regrettably, this isn't possible when the other side of the equation (Honda) keeps under delivering and missing targets.

Snorked
Snorked
68
Joined: 16 Mar 2015, 21:00

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

Does McLaren's supply of hybrid parts continue?
Q: Mr. Yamamoto (of Honda), said sister company of F1 team "McLaren Applied Technologies" had supplied a lot of hybrid parts. McLaren · Honda has decided to divide it, will this relationship continue in the future?

Honda Masashi Yamamoto Director of Motor Sports:
"For the time being we will continue to work with the company, while we are already producing many parts ourselves, so in the future Honda will produce it."
http://www.topnews.jp/2017/09/16/news/f1/163144.html

And old report but what parts do McLaren supply that Honda will still have to work with McLaren (into next season?)?

Was Wazari hinting at the MGU-H being manufactured by McLaren?

User avatar
Vasconia
6
Joined: 30 Aug 2012, 10:45
Location: Basque Country

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

j.yank wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 10:35

Is it so hard to understand the difference between knowledge (science) and talent (craft)? And please, give me a break, I don't compare myself with PP, I compare Newey with PP. I will not say that PP is completely useless (these are your words). I am just saying from what we see that PP hasn't achieved the craftsman of Newey. I think this is normal - we are not equal in everything - in any filed of life someone is better than the rest. If you think that PP must be equal to Newey this is your problem.
This is the second o third year of Podromou without Newey, so I think its a little bit early to judge his talent. Moreover, we have spent 3 seasons discussing about how good the chasis because with that terrible PU its almost imposible to know how competitive the chasis is.

User avatar
etusch
131
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 23:09
Location: Turkey

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

Snorked wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 16:45
Does McLaren's supply of hybrid parts continue?
Q: Mr. Yamamoto (of Honda), said sister company of F1 team "McLaren Applied Technologies" had supplied a lot of hybrid parts. McLaren · Honda has decided to divide it, will this relationship continue in the future?

Honda Masashi Yamamoto Director of Motor Sports:
"For the time being we will continue to work with the company, while we are already producing many parts ourselves, so in the future Honda will produce it."
http://www.topnews.jp/2017/09/16/news/f1/163144.html

And old report but what parts do McLaren supply that Honda will still have to work with McLaren (into next season?)?

Was Wazari hinting at the MGU-H being manufactured by McLaren?
Good point

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

j.yank wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 10:35
. I am just saying from what we see that PP hasn't achieved the craftsman of Newey.
Well, his chassis is receiving several compliments from the whole paddock despite suffering the HUGE handicap of the worst PU by far. That´s something. What has Newey achieved with the worst engine of the paddock? :roll:
j.yank wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 10:35
If you think that PP must be equal to Newey this is your problem.
I never rate professionals who are working at the top class, I´m not that haughty, they´re working on top F1 teams so they obviously are awesome proffesionals.

And never ever make such comparisons. You should have worked with both of them to make an idea, and neither of us did that, so claiming he´s not that good because he´s not managed to build a winning car with the worst PU on the grid is anything but reasonable #-o

User avatar
adrianjordan
24
Joined: 28 Feb 2010, 11:34
Location: West Yorkshire, England

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

Andres125sx wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 19:07
Well, his chassis is receiving several compliments from the whole paddock despite suffering the HUGE handicap of the worst PU by far. That´s something. What has Newey achieved with the worst engine of the paddock? :roll:
Surely you have figured out by now that everyone who says the McLaren chassis, whether they be commentators, current drivers for other teams, ex-drivers or anyone else is clearly in the pocket of the McLaren management in order to further their campaign of fake-news against Honda who have actually produced a 2000bhp monster of an engine which is being hampered by the brick of a chassis that McLaren have produced. :evil:
Favourite driver: Lando Norris
Favourite team: McLaren

Turned down the chance to meet Vettel at Silverstone in 2007. He was a test driver at the time and I didn't think it was worth queuing!! 🤦🏻‍♂️

User avatar
JonoNic
4
Joined: 05 Mar 2015, 15:54

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

adrianjordan wrote:
Andres125sx wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 19:07
Well, his chassis is receiving several compliments from the whole paddock despite suffering the HUGE handicap of the worst PU by far. That´s something. What has Newey achieved with the worst engine of the paddock? :roll:
Surely you have figured out by now that everyone who says the McLaren chassis, whether they be commentators, current drivers for other teams, ex-drivers or anyone else is clearly in the pocket of the McLaren management in order to further their campaign of fake-news against Honda who have actually produced a 2000bhp monster of an engine which is being hampered by the brick of a chassis that McLaren have produced. :evil:
It must be that gearbox resonance causing it to lose 1100bhp in race trim... Bummer

Sent from my SM-A700F using Tapatalk

Always find the gap then use it.

j.yank
j.yank
24
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 13:45

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

OviJohn wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 15:15
I mean seriously guys, is it that hard to understand the relation between chassis design and manufacturing with PU size, weight, cooling needs, AND power figures?!
OK, obviously you know all of these and I think many people around the globe will appreciate to share your knowledge. Or we can open here a casino betting what are the power figures, etc.? Many people here speak as they are F1 team members and they know exactly how much underrated is the Honda engine, and how much powerful is the Mercedes engine. They just refuse the idea that maybe the reality is not so simple and most of this reality is constructed in their minds not because they have facts but because they tend to accept what they wish to accept from what other people want they to accept.

techman
techman
-5
Joined: 09 Jun 2016, 10:25

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

so happy that mclaren and honda parting ways. now its no where to hide for mclaren next year. any deficit with be compared with redbull and highlighted, and mclaren chassis weakness will be very visible.
Well, his chassis is receiving several compliments from the whole paddock despite suffering the HUGE handicap of the worst PU by far. That´s something. What has Newey achieved with the worst engine of the paddock? :roll:
. adrian newey has done wonders even with a low power engines before by reducing drag and increasing efficiency i.e running skinny rear wing angle, mclaren are no where in comparison to adrian newey philosophy. mclaren philosophy, run high drag boast about how good in corners and blame engine.
Last edited by techman on 16 Nov 2017, 21:14, edited 1 time in total.

j.yank
j.yank
24
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 13:45

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

Andres125sx wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 19:07

Well, his chassis is receiving several compliments from the whole paddock despite suffering the HUGE handicap of the worst PU by far. That´s something. What has Newey achieved with the worst engine of the paddock? :roll:

Hm, as far as I know the chassis don't have a power, neither they are driven by compliments. If I remember right, in the last race the so called worst engine drive the McLaren chassis ahead of one works team, ahead of one of its customer teams, and ahead of one Mercedes customer teams. Not bad for a worst engine ...

j.yank
j.yank
24
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 13:45

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

Andres125sx wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 19:07

Well, his chassis is receiving several compliments from the whole paddock despite suffering the HUGE handicap of the worst PU by far. That´s something. What has Newey achieved with the worst engine of the paddock? :roll:

Hm, as far as I know the chassis don't have a power, neither they are driven by compliments. If I remember right, in the last race the so called worst engine drove the McLaren chassis ahead of one works team, ahead of one of its customer teams, and ahead of one Mercedes customer teams. Not bad for a worst engine ...

User avatar
Alonso Fan
10
Joined: 06 Apr 2013, 18:21

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

j.yank wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 21:05
OviJohn wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 15:15
I mean seriously guys, is it that hard to understand the relation between chassis design and manufacturing with PU size, weight, cooling needs, AND power figures?!
OK, obviously you know all of these and I think many people around the globe will appreciate to share your knowledge. Or we can open here a casino betting what are the power figures, etc.? Many people here speak as they are F1 team members and they know exactly how much underrated is the Honda engine, and how much powerful is the Mercedes engine. They just refuse the idea that maybe the reality is not so simple and most of this reality is constructed in their minds not because they have facts but because they tend to accept what they wish to accept from what other people want they to accept.
Alot like yourself and Mr techman here
SHR Modding
Youtube
Twitter
Discord

Sound Developer for Reiza Studios
Sound Modder for Assetto Corsa

User avatar
HPD
198
Joined: 30 Jun 2016, 16:06

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

I think people here feel very offended when I publish Japanese news (with official quotes, not rumors).

And I think many users here try to say. That Mclaren can not run with low downforce, because the vehicle loses its balance and the pilot complains. (Matt Morris).

Unlike Red Bull, which can work with low downforce to have more top speed.
(Red bull 338km/h vs Renaul 333km/h vs MclarenHonda 325 km/h)

Matt Morris tries to explain that this has a reason or a justification. It will be true? we will not know. But we are left with the doubt.

Many people thought that Mclaren was running with high downforce to make Honda look bad.
But I really believe that Mclaren can not look bad in front of the public, or show a weakness of his chassis.
This could simply be a commercial tactic to obtain a sponsor.

j.yank
j.yank
24
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 13:45

Re: 2017 Mclaren F1 Team - Honda

Post

Alonso Fan wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 21:15
j.yank wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 21:05
OviJohn wrote:
16 Nov 2017, 15:15
I mean seriously guys, is it that hard to understand the relation between chassis design and manufacturing with PU size, weight, cooling needs, AND power figures?!
OK, obviously you know all of these and I think many people around the globe will appreciate to share your knowledge. Or we can open here a casino betting what are the power figures, etc.? Many people here speak as they are F1 team members and they know exactly how much underrated is the Honda engine, and how much powerful is the Mercedes engine. They just refuse the idea that maybe the reality is not so simple and most of this reality is constructed in their minds not because they have facts but because they tend to accept what they wish to accept from what other people want they to accept.
Alot like yourself and Mr techman here
I am waiting to be enlighten from you regarding the power figures of all PU. Please, give us your facts.