IMO there is no merit in this case above ....coaster wrote: ↑17 Jun 2025, 05:57It would have a yaw rocking motion, but still balanced as a opposed mass still travels in the opposite direction.
The 12 cylinder would 3 sets of that crank configuration spaced at 120 degrees.
To keep forces in line with each other as much as possible.
1+2@0
3+4@180
5+6@120
7+8@300
9+10@240
11+12@60
Why is it such a big issue having 12 pins instead of 6?mnauno wrote: ↑02 Feb 2025, 20:28In my german speaking country we don't have the term "flat-engine", we would call a "flat-12" a V-12, and a "horizontally-opposed" engine a boxer engine. But as you and the colleague already said, using a crankshaft with 12 crank pins would not make any sense, maybe the amount of buzzwords and terms being thrown around the internet was just confusing me.
You were pretty careful not to actually answer the question.Tommy Cookers wrote: ↑21 Jun 2025, 16:20for the same reasons it would be a big issue having 6 crankpins in current F1 rather than the 3 that they have
Hm. So I guess that's not worth it for the decrease of vibration and such.
TC (with apologies for the editing mess) ....mzso wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025, 12:37You were pretty careful not to actually answer the question.Tommy Cookers wrote: ↑21 Jun 2025, 16:20for the same reasons it would be a big issue having 6 crankpins in current F1 rather than the 3 that they have
(TC @mzso ....)
that's because you usually ignore my answers ....
(not that I'm complaining - it keeps a bit of decorum)
12 pins would degrade crankshaft torsional frequency to a critical level - load path (compliance) being so extended ....
mzso ('12 pins') .... I guess that's not worth it for the decrease of vibration and such.
On the advantage side I was thinking about the opposed pistons cancelling out each other's forces. I guess it would be a waste of effort with a high number of cylinders to begin with.Tommy Cookers wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025, 17:46TC (with apologies for the editing mess) ....
since there is no vibration with '6 pins' (6 throws) there can be no benefit with 12 ....
that's why no-one has ever made a 12 pin engine
Porsche and Coventry Climax made flat 16s (with of course 8 pins/throws)
Was it successful?saviour stivala wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 05:58The Coventry Climax FWMW flat-16 was effectively four four-cylinderengines joined together, four cylinder heads, with four exhaust systems. The two flat crankshafts were phased at 90 degrees, and joined end-to-end by the Swedish SKF hydraulic pressure coupling. Dispite the double the number of cylinders, the flat-16 was only one inch longer than the V-8, and only 15 lbs heaver.
The FWMW flat-16 project was aborted while still on the dyno development stage.mzso wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 10:13Was it successful?saviour stivala wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 05:58The Coventry Climax FWMW flat-16 was effectively four four-cylinderengines joined together, four cylinder heads, with four exhaust systems. The two flat crankshafts were phased at 90 degrees, and joined end-to-end by the Swedish SKF hydraulic pressure coupling. Dispite the double the number of cylinders, the flat-16 was only one inch longer than the V-8, and only 15 lbs heaver.