Zynerji wrote: ↑Wed Mar 28, 2018 7:15 pmSo, we got lots of info from Honda about the changes over time in their engine, and something just jumped out at me concerning their revelations. They claimed that a large part of unlocking performance from the VLIM was being able to actually close the intake completely on demand. At first that didn't make sense to me, then I had an idea about what they may be doing.
The whole point would be to operate in this manner:
TDC->IntakeValveOpen->VLIMopen->PistonDownIntake->(possibly light fuel injection on intake)->BDC->VLIMclose->PistonUp->IntakeValveClose(after PistonUp pressurizes the intake runner of the VLIM)->TJIignite->PistonDownPower->ExhaustValveOpen->IntakeValveOpen/VLIMclosed(secondary pulse to ExhaustValveOpen, possible second ignition)->PistonUp->ExhaustValveClose, VLIMopen-PistonDownIntake...
I am interested in anyone's thoughts concerning this idea. Using the VLIM as a pressurised pre-chamber to cause an afterburn after the exhaust valves open could potentially help the spooling of the turbo, and also cause the cackle that only the Honda has. This is all based upon the interviews buried the Honda Engine/Preseason/STR threads, and I couldn't find their direct links anymore, but im sure others here have them bookmarked...
This could also simulate a variable intake valve, as you could just leave the valve partially open, and fully control the flow through the VLIM.
Where did they say that ? Sounds like they meant closing the turbo inlet vanes at partial loads - someone has posted a picture of the pre whirl mechanism a while ago.They claimed that a large part of unlocking performance from the VLIM was being able to actually close the intake completely on demand
One of the Honda interviews. Whichever one was about the VLIM evolution. And I'm pretty sure someone also posted the Honda Patent that does the same thing.Mudflap wrote: ↑Wed Mar 28, 2018 8:41 pmWhere did they say that ? Sounds like they meant closing the turbo inlet vanes at partial loads - someone has posted a picture of the pre whirl mechanism a while ago.They claimed that a large part of unlocking performance from the VLIM was being able to actually close the intake completely on demand
Really now, why would they keep the intake valve open - it would go through the piston !
Secondly, if you want to block flow after the turbo you can just close the throttles - that's what they are there for!
Not that its viable, but could it not be done by lifting the fulcrum bar of the rocker arms? (I know rocker arms went out with Noah's Ark, but just asking?)
But the VLIM:s are not opening/ closing on a per cycle basis.Zynerji wrote: ↑Thu Mar 29, 2018 4:35 pmI still think there may be something to running a pressurized VLIM pre-chamber. If its pressurized with a slight amount of fuel, and opens into a closing exhaust cylinder cycle (lower volume) that has an open exhaust port, you would be able to evacuate residual exhaust gasses from the space by blasting in the fresh air from the VLIM, and if that were to ignite due to the presence of fuel in the pressure chamber, it would probably ignite in the exhaust port directly, causing a heat spike to go to the turbo to be harvested. I imagine the entrainment of the incoming air that is acted upon when there is a timed opening of the pressurized VLIM chamber would be worth investigating as well. If the IntakeValve opens 1 degree before the VLIM opens at the other end, the pulse may be helping with cylinder filling as well. It would also allow for variable compression as the VLIM could always vent back to the plenum, possibly introducing a partial air\fuel mixture there as well.
My ideas, not an engineer.
It would be great to hear from some of the engine gurus on this one. I wish we could tag users in posts...
Have you ever heard of a VLIM even being able to do that?