Its not were you stand that's important its where you finish .redbull are going to put everything into 2025 knowing that there 2025 pu will be rubbish ,the chassis will also be a question mark since Newey will not be around to guide them.so i will put my money on Max winning the driver champ.they may not have been the quickest in bahrain but that's just one type of circuit ,they always been very quick in high speed corners were aero efficiency is paramount.
I hope/think you meant 2026.Bill wrote: ↑08 Mar 2025, 14:27Its not were you stand that's important its where you finish .redbull are going to put everything into 2025 knowing that there 2025 pu will be rubbish ,the chassis will also be a question mark since Newey will not be around to guide them.so i will put my money on Max winning the driver champ.they may not have been the quickest in bahrain but that's just one type of circuit ,they always been very quick in high speed corners were aero efficiency is paramount.
Nice video. Just watching it I can see how he brings a lot of fun energy and lightness to the team. Perez didnt have that and I think Yuki wouldnt. They were too serious. Max is already a serious guy, so Liam balances things out and makes the team more likeable, to me at least.Wouter wrote: ↑07 Mar 2025, 09:52How F1 Drivers Prepare For A New Season | Behind The Charge
Watch along for exclusive footage of Liam’s first time driving an F1 car in 2025, Max’s seat fit at our Campus in Milton Keynes,
and behind the scenes of getting the RB21 out on track for the first time at pre-season Testing in Bahrain!
And a long article about Liam in GQ Australia:
https://www.gq.com.au/gq-sports/liam-la ... 5e1db69bf6
Yes 2026 pukptaylor wrote: ↑08 Mar 2025, 16:46I hope/think you meant 2026.Bill wrote: ↑08 Mar 2025, 14:27Its not were you stand that's important its where you finish .redbull are going to put everything into 2025 knowing that there 2025 pu will be rubbish ,the chassis will also be a question mark since Newey will not be around to guide them.so i will put my money on Max winning the driver champ.they may not have been the quickest in bahrain but that's just one type of circuit ,they always been very quick in high speed corners were aero efficiency is paramount.
I didn't say he was happy, I said he wasn't dooming the season yet. People are quick to forget that RB showed some serious pace at times during testing, to my eyes only matched or exceeded by Norris.Wouter wrote: ↑08 Mar 2025, 10:41.Cs98 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2025, 18:49
It's typical underdog rhetoric, lower expectations in case of the worst case scenario. If Max really felt the car was a dud I think he would have more to say. He does not come across as a doomer, just deferential to another team, kind of like Hamilton when he was winning. I get the impression he thinks they are behind McLaren (no surprise), but not by miles. I didn't see anything in the data which tells me 4th best (I only look at Verstappen's times). We'll see in the first few races.
Max wasn't happy at all, he seems a bit sad actually. He wasn't playing the underdog, that is not Max his style.
He said yesterday "I don't think we can fight for the win in Melbourne. I hope they can make some improvements in a few races."
So at the moment he doesn't know if there will be some improvements.
.
I found it in this article https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/why- ... ock-anchorWouter wrote: ↑08 Mar 2025, 17:52.
That seems very odd if Waché said that. You know Rudy van Buren, he was Friday afternoon in the Viaplay studio and he said
they finally had no more correlation problems!
He flew during the night from the UK straight from the factory in MK (after a few sim days) to Schiphol. So he knows it from the sim
and the data from the track he received. The correlation is finally good he said. I trust him more than Waché.
The last bit of hope I am clinging on to look at all the responses lol. That first day stint that Max put in was sublime.Cs98 wrote: ↑08 Mar 2025, 17:51I didn't say he was happy, I said he wasn't dooming the season yet. People are quick to forget that RB showed some serious pace at times during testing, to my eyes only matched or exceeded by Norris.Wouter wrote: ↑08 Mar 2025, 10:41.Cs98 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2025, 18:49
It's typical underdog rhetoric, lower expectations in case of the worst case scenario. If Max really felt the car was a dud I think he would have more to say. He does not come across as a doomer, just deferential to another team, kind of like Hamilton when he was winning. I get the impression he thinks they are behind McLaren (no surprise), but not by miles. I didn't see anything in the data which tells me 4th best (I only look at Verstappen's times). We'll see in the first few races.
Max wasn't happy at all, he seems a bit sad actually. He wasn't playing the underdog, that is not Max his style.
He said yesterday "I don't think we can fight for the win in Melbourne. I hope they can make some improvements in a few races."
So at the moment he doesn't know if there will be some improvements.
.TNTHead wrote: ↑08 Mar 2025, 21:02.Wouter wrote: ↑08 Mar 2025, 17:52.
That seems very odd if Waché said that. You know Rudy van Buren, he was Friday afternoon in the Viaplay studio and he said
they finally had no more correlation problems!
He flew during the night from the UK straight from the factory in MK (after a few sim days) to Schiphol. So he knows it from the sim
and the data from the track he received. The correlation is finally good he said. I trust him more than Waché.
I found it in this article https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/why- ... ock-anchor
He doesn't state it directly but it is suggested that correlation issues are still present.
.