2014-2020 Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
User avatar
deadhead
52
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2022 7:24 pm

Re: 2014-2020 Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

I just watched a video on permanent magnet vs. induction electric motors and made me think about what kind are used in F1.. does anyone here know?

From what I saw in the video, I guess having both is best case scenario, but I doubt that's the case, so I'm guessing they are using permanent magnet because they can deliver more power at higher speeds.

saviour stivala
saviour stivala
52
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2018 11:54 am

Re: 2014-2020 Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

According to CAR MAGAZINE - (CARMAGAZINE.CO.UK OF 2020) MGU is a permanent magnet brushless AC electric motor.

JRodrigues
JRodrigues
12
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 4:19 pm

Re: 2014-2020 Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Audi has their on the benches and running full GP distances.

Image

Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
643
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:55 pm

Re: 2014-2020 Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

deadhead wrote:
Thu Apr 04, 2024 3:36 am
I just watched a video on permanent magnet vs. induction electric motors and made me think about what kind are used in F1.. does anyone here know?
From what I saw in the video, I guess having both is best case scenario, but I doubt that's the case, so I'm guessing they are using permanent magnet because they can deliver more power at higher speeds.
to not impede gearshifts the MGU-K needs high acceleration/deceleration ability 10000-11500 crank rpm in c.5 millisec
the induction machine can never be responsive enough for this

interestingly the latest plan for 2026 is to continue having 8 speeds (6 was predicted)
the rpm drop being 40% more with 6 speeds it's likely there's a shift response issue (with 6 speed & 2026-size MGU-K)

clownfish
clownfish
7
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 12:14 pm

Re: 2014-2020 Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Does anybody happen to know what method current F1 engines use for their rev limiter(s)?
Just curious after some chat on various broadcasters around Gasly's engine failure.

I had a search but couldn't find anything concrete for the V6 formula.

gruntguru
gruntguru
566
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:43 am

Re: 2014-2020 Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Depends what you mean by "method".
They would have several options available to them.
  • Cut ignition. It is almost certain that Ignition cut is not used - unless fuel is simultaneously cut. Ignition cut alone wastes fuel.
  • Cut fuel (skip injection). Fuel cut may be the most efficient. Leaving the throttle and boost in place ensures that firing events that remain are at the highest possible efficiency.
  • Intake throttling. Throttling is easy to do - the ECU already has this capability.
Ignition cut or fuel cut would involve cutting ignition or fuel events in some order that shares the cutting over all cylinders. The number of "cut events" would start with a small number at some rpm just below the limit, and progressively increasing to 100% cut at the rpm limit.
je suis charlie

Vappy
Vappy
0
Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2024 7:09 pm

Re: 2014-2020 Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Quite the spectacle to see the renault engine die after doing 13K RPM. I would imagine the tolerance levels (strength) is on the limit of engine use range, rather than build a bit stronger for that extra bit of reliability and pushing it harder for longer under certain conditions (strat mode, etc).

User avatar
bananapeel23
9
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2023 9:43 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: 2014-2020 Formula One 1.6l V6 turbo engine formula

Post

Tommy Cookers wrote:
Mon Jul 01, 2024 1:02 pm
deadhead wrote:
Thu Apr 04, 2024 3:36 am
I just watched a video on permanent magnet vs. induction electric motors and made me think about what kind are used in F1.. does anyone here know?
From what I saw in the video, I guess having both is best case scenario, but I doubt that's the case, so I'm guessing they are using permanent magnet because they can deliver more power at higher speeds.
to not impede gearshifts the MGU-K needs high acceleration/deceleration ability 10000-11500 crank rpm in c.5 millisec
the induction machine can never be responsive enough for this

interestingly the latest plan for 2026 is to continue having 8 speeds (6 was predicted)
the rpm drop being 40% more with 6 speeds it's likely there's a shift response issue (with 6 speed & 2026-size MGU-K)
I'm so happy they went for an 8-speed. A 6-speed would make these miserably slow cars even slower.