Isn't this the "Caption Competition" thread?modbaraban wrote:In any case reposting the same picture 3 bloody times on the same page is a pointless waste of space regardless the content of the picture... unless you were deliberately trying to get on WB's nerves. Please avoid quoting pictures on the same page... As well as double- and tripleposting.
It's the 1996 Ferrari - one of the all-time great looking F1 carsScotracer wrote:Conceptual wrote:What car is this, and WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO LOSE IT?!?!?!?!?Scotracer wrote:
Ferrari demo their 2009 car. Critics suggest the FIA is just going around in circles. According to inside sources, the regulations were well recieved by Ferrari Accountants.
This looks like a hack. I might do some research or some torrent downloading today of the first few races of 1996...timbo wrote:Yeah, it was beautiful, but only before the midseason mutilationScotracer wrote:It's the 1996 Ferrari - one of the all-time great looking F1 cars![]()
As I recall, no, high-nose was featured to the end of the season. I think they managed to improved aero, but reliability was the biggst problem. Remember Schumacher retiring in French GP warm-up lap.Scotracer wrote:That car was a total botch job. It was a desperate attempt by Ferrari to get better aero...and it didn't work. I believe they switched back to low-nose for the last couple of races.
My mistake.timbo wrote:As I recall, no, high-nose was featured to the end of the season. I think they managed to improved aero, but reliability was the biggst problem. Remember Schumacher retiring in French GP warm-up lap.Scotracer wrote:That car was a total botch job. It was a desperate attempt by Ferrari to get better aero...and it didn't work. I believe they switched back to low-nose for the last couple of races.
Why not just ignore the picture? i think that is easier.Sawtooth-spike wrote:I always thought this part of the Forum was ment to be a bit of silly fun. If something Really does offend somebody then we should really give them respect and not attack them for there beliefs.
Can people just go back an remove the pictures that are causing an issue, so we can return this topic to being fun again?
I have received positive replies from the two members who initially used the swastica pic. Thanks to them for their understanding. =D>Sawtooth-spike wrote:I always thought this part of the Forum was ment to be a bit of silly fun. If something Really does offend somebody then we should really give them respect and not attack them for there beliefs.
Can people just go back an remove the pictures that are causing an issue, so we can return this topic to being fun again?