But what do we mean by a "hotrod" driver? A fast driver? I don't think a thinking driver like Schumacher was ever disadvantaged versus, say, a Montoya who was, let's say, more "flat out".raymondu999 wrote:I disagree that the compromise is there. A "hotrod" driver, for lack of a better word, has a huge advantage with bad tyres + refuelling, because not only do they have fresher rubber, but they have less fuel too. I actually quite liked how China panned out - with 2 stoppers battling with 3 stoppers, etc
You are absolutely correct. They have clearly demonstrated that they no where close to having complete control over their setup. Unless they do very strict back to back tests, this current car setup is not a good test platform.marcush. wrote:I think it was simply not necessary to introduce new parts until now.
I disagree, the car is consistent or can be made consistent under ideal conditions. Not a 20 degree(f) temperature change between Saturday and Sunday. If you think that putting on a new piece will get them .5 sec you are mistaken. It will be by bits and pieces measured in the hundredths..hardingfv32 wrote:You are absolutely correct. They have clearly demonstrated that they no where close to having complete control over their setup. Unless they do very strict back to back tests, this current car setup is not a good test platform.marcush. wrote:I think it was simply not necessary to introduce new parts until now.
Brian
Websta wrote:...But it is also unfair as certain driving styles are easier on tyres, whilst a sprint race would be fairer...
The operative word there being race.raymondu999 wrote:...A sprint race would favor the blitzing drivers too though...
+1f1316 wrote:...Producing a purposely *bad* component on the car is the epitome of the artificiality many have complained about, and certainly not the spirit of the pinacle of motor racing.
Unfortunately they have no idea what the ideal conditions are. If they do, then they will have to wait for them to reappear before doing in valid testing. Does not sound very practical.Byron R wrote:I disagree, the car is consistent or can be made consistent under ideal conditions.
I am not worried about that. I am dissapointed about any lack of updates. Minor gearbox & suspension changes only to improve the tyre handling.Morteza wrote:@ Mr.S The thing is I hope that the new gearbox will not have any failure due to the reliability problems.