Tozza Mazza wrote:Why do F1 cars need to burn petrol for no reason at 100km/h for about 40 seconds a race when speed is limited? They don't.
Excuse me? There is no
need for racing at all. Full stop. Motor racing has no real purpose - it started as a way for rich guys with time on their hands to show off to each other. There is no higher purpose other than glorified willy waving. Once you realise that, the rest just falls in to place.
To pretend that running the pitlane on electricity makes a difference is just naive. It's window dressing. That's it. Where does that electricity come from? The engine burning petrol, that's where. "Ah" you say, "but the electricity comes from braking and is thereofre recovered energy". Yes, but lots of ebergy is wasted in making, accelerating and turning the electrical systems (motor, batteries etc.) so there won't be a net gain in the system. It costs petrol to use KERS et al.
The embodied energy in making an F1 car, getting it to the circuit, running the thing at the circuit then taking it all home again far out weighs any benefit from silly window dressings like running up the pitlane on battery power.
F1 is a huge waste of resources. Hell, 100,000s of people are dying in Africa each year from bad water and no food and you're worrying about how F1 needs to look road-relevant.
Get some perspective!
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.