Michelin said they will be back if FIA change their policy about just one tire supplier, as they want tire war. BridgestoneJersey Tom wrote:I don't see it as so much that... more that it's probably prohibitively expensive. Companies more have to ask if it's worth the time and money spent. Bridgestone/Firestone was over it and left, even with what I thought was pretty good PR and exposure. Michelin wanted nothing to do with it unless it meant not having to go back to 13" build machines. Didn't hear anything from Goodyear/Dunlop of having any serious interest in a bid. I feel like none of them were interested in the cost of going all in on it.Huntresa wrote:And who would wanna take over and take the beating from half of the F1 world like Pirelli has just taken?Who?
There's no assurance that Pirelli will be back.
didnt show any signs to get back, specialy when FIA changed their policy and instead racing wanted "show". Bridgestone didnt wanted anything with creating less durable tires. Pirelli get their place in F1 in first place because they offered lowest price for tires, as they supported FIA decision about one supplier in F1. 3 years are passed and nothing changed,
so i think Pirelli will stay in F1, but if in any case FIA change their decision about one supplier, Pirelli is probably gone. But i think it's too late for that. Teams already working under full steam on 2014. getting two new suppliers immediatly would probably make big difference in devoloping new cars.