HampusA wrote:I don´t know about that really. Hamilton believe it or not have huge respect for Alonso. He won´t exactly make room for Hamilton.zeph wrote:I agree that Hamilton was pure awesome today, but I don't think Alonso could have fended that off. He just rolled out of the pit lane on cold tires, and I think it would have been a collision if he had tried.
And it goes both ways really. Alonso knows Hamilton and what he can do.
Formula 1 website does this from time to time. They make mistakes like this, don't be surprised.raymondu999 wrote:Can anyone please tell me why Jenson is (at the time of this writing) labelled as having came 3rd in the race? I'm referring to this: http://www.formula1.com/news/headlines/ ... 12348.html
Mclaren certainly had the fastest car on the track today, by 10 k's an hour and I reckon they nailed the set up for the track as well.Pierce89 wrote:Both Red bull drivers have admitted that they had nothing for Alonso and Hamilton. The RB7 might still be marginally the quickest car, but the two best drivers in the world showed everyone why they're considered the two best drivers in the world. I still believe though, that either one of them would be even quicker in the Red Bull. I believe Fred and Lewie are head and shoulders above Markie Mark and the Sea bass Bunch
I see, well that was his only shot and thankfully he had enough momentum to keep it on the outside. We saw with Webber that if you don´t have enough momentum the door will close like Hamilton did.zeph wrote:Maybe I wasn't clear.
What I meant was that Hamilton carried much greater momentum and Alonso just came out of the pit lane on cold tires. The only way he could have stopped Hamilton's surge was by outright throwing his car in front of the McLaren and that would have certainly ended the race for both of them. I certainly did not mean that Hamilton would have crashed into him.
I'm not sure how those two statements align – how can you stand by your statement that Vettel's 4th was a great drive, but also say he was crappy today?Traction wrote:That I did..your memory serves you well.I stand by my statement. Based on the race that Vettel had today he should have been even further down...like 10th or something...he was crappy today...
what of button's car?Traction wrote:Mclaren certainly had the fastest car on the track today, by 10 k's an hour and I reckon they nailed the set up for the track as well.Pierce89 wrote:Both Red bull drivers have admitted that they had nothing for Alonso and Hamilton. The RB7 might still be marginally the quickest car, but the two best drivers in the world showed everyone why they're considered the two best drivers in the world. I still believe though, that either one of them would be even quicker in the Red Bull. I believe Fred and Lewie are head and shoulders above Markie Mark and the Sea bass Bunch
Fastest car on the track is not measured by speed on the straight – if it were, Lotus would never have beaten Ferrari into a pulp back in the day.Traction wrote:Mclaren certainly had the fastest car on the track today, by 10 k's an hour and I reckon they nailed the set up for the track as well.Pierce89 wrote:Both Red bull drivers have admitted that they had nothing for Alonso and Hamilton. The RB7 might still be marginally the quickest car, but the two best drivers in the world showed everyone why they're considered the two best drivers in the world. I still believe though, that either one of them would be even quicker in the Red Bull. I believe Fred and Lewie are head and shoulders above Markie Mark and the Sea bass Bunch
Overall..beelsebob wrote:Fastest car on the track is not measured by speed on the straight – if it were, Lotus would never have beaten Ferrari into a pulp back in the day.Traction wrote:Mclaren certainly had the fastest car on the track today, by 10 k's an hour and I reckon they nailed the set up for the track as well.Pierce89 wrote:Both Red bull drivers have admitted that they had nothing for Alonso and Hamilton. The RB7 might still be marginally the quickest car, but the two best drivers in the world showed everyone why they're considered the two best drivers in the world. I still believe though, that either one of them would be even quicker in the Red Bull. I believe Fred and Lewie are head and shoulders above Markie Mark and the Sea bass Bunch
Yet when LH was out front with a clear track he was clocking 1.34 odd per lap so I don't see how he lost out. His upgrades and his set up clearly worked out well. There is no ways Mcclaren was third fastest.ringo wrote:what of button's car?Traction wrote:Mclaren certainly had the fastest car on the track today, by 10 k's an hour and I reckon they nailed the set up for the track as well.Pierce89 wrote:Both Red bull drivers have admitted that they had nothing for Alonso and Hamilton. The RB7 might still be marginally the quickest car, but the two best drivers in the world showed everyone why they're considered the two best drivers in the world. I still believe though, that either one of them would be even quicker in the Red Bull. I believe Fred and Lewie are head and shoulders above Markie Mark and the Sea bass Bunch
mclaren looked like 3rd fastest to me. Hamlton couldn't run away from webber or Alonso, and actually lost out when the got clean air.
Traction wrote:Overall..beelsebob wrote:Fastest car on the track is not measured by speed on the straight – if it were, Lotus would never have beaten Ferrari into a pulp back in the day.Traction wrote: Mclaren certainly had the fastest car on the track today, by 10 k's an hour and I reckon they nailed the set up for the track as well.
In the first stint I think the Ferrari and Red Bull were slightly quicker. In the second stint it was just about even. Third stint and the Red Bull fell back with Ferrari just about hanging on to the McLaren. Final stint Lewis had a slight edge. Pretty even between those top three, with Lewis proving the best driver on the day, just ahead of Alonso with Webber beaten to third. With the way he was driving today I think that had Lewis been at the wheel of the Ferrari or Red Bull then the outcome would have been the same, probably the same for Alonso, but Webber would definitely not have been as close had he been in one of the other cars.Traction wrote:Yet when LH was out front with a clear track he was clocking 1.34 odd per lap so I don't see how he lost out. His upgrades and his set up clearly worked out well. There is no ways Mcclaren was third fastest.ringo wrote:what of button's car?Traction wrote:Mclaren certainly had the fastest car on the track today, by 10 k's an hour and I reckon they nailed the set up for the track as well.
mclaren looked like 3rd fastest to me. Hamlton couldn't run away from webber or Alonso, and actually lost out when the got clean air.
http://en.mclarenf-1.com/index.php?page ... k%20WebberTraction wrote:Yet when LH was out front with a clear track he was clocking 1.34 odd per lap so I don't see how he lost out. His upgrades and his set up clearly worked out well. There is no ways Mcclaren was third fastest.ringo wrote:
what of button's car?
mclaren looked like 3rd fastest to me. Hamlton couldn't run away from webber or Alonso, and actually lost out when the got clean air.