The FIA have today confirmed that the blown diffuser row has been settled, with all teams agreeing to continue running blown diffusers to the Valencia regulations. No other rule changes in this area will be imposed during 2011 while their complete banning is set for 2012.
Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
noname wrote:2013 will mark introduction of e-turbos.
What's the source for this?
2013 technical regulations.
I think it's quite a common knowledge, already. There was a quite nice article made by Pat Symonds in "Race Tech" few months ago dicussing changes 2013 seson will bring. It was focused mainly on the new drivetrain.
Remembering of course that FOTA agreed to veto 90% of the changes for 2013 a few days ago
noname wrote:2013 will mark introduction of e-turbos.
What's the source for this?
2013 technical regulations.
I think it's quite a common knowledge, already. There was a quite nice article made by Pat Symonds in "Race Tech" few months ago dicussing changes 2013 seson will bring. It was focused mainly on the new drivetrain.
Well, doing that only gets you a bunch of hits of people speculating what those regulations will be, hardly an official confirmation. Or maybe i'm doing it wrong
If in Barcelona, teams protest the blown diffusors, and win where we have half the field not being able to run the same setup as they ran in practice, i will not watch F1 in 2011. I refuse to take part in a witch hunt to the top teams by teams that shouldnt even be considered for GP2.
ecapox wrote:If in Barcelona, teams protest the blown diffusors, and win where we have half the field not being able to run the same setup as they ran in practice, i will not watch F1 in 2011. I refuse to take part in a witch hunt to the top teams by teams that shouldnt even be considered for GP2.
Yes, if teams get bumped for this on this weekend it would be a PR disaster for Whiting and company. The implications for the sport would be much like crashgate was, except it would involve the sanctioning body instead of a single team. Reading what Whiting said, it does indeed seem like a welcome to protest any of the top teams, but Red Bull in particular. He no like the drink company ..
Whiting's response would have been to a question posed by journalists interviewing him. It's not him inviting teams to protest. There was no press release by him.
As to the question of for whom this would be a disaster, I'm not sure anyone would win out of it.
The sanctioning body is just doing its job - ensuring the rules are adhered to. If it is found that 90% of teams are cheating, how is this a blight on Whiting & co?
Remember, until there is a request for clarification of a rule, the stewards do not investigate each and every part of a car.
All Whiting said was, should a clarification/protest be lodged with the race stewards (not him or the FIA), then there is always a possibility that (rightly or wrongly) the race stewards (which are independent and different at each race) 'could' find the engine mapping to be contrary to F1 rules.
Of course at that stage any team indicted would lodge an appeal, and it all ends up in court in a few races time..
That's when things truly get messy, as each subsequent race's results, until the appeal is heard, will be awaiting the final ruling.
Any post(s) made by this user are (semi-)educated opinion(s), based on random fact(s) blurred by the smudges of time.
Any fact(s) claimed by this user will be supplemented by a link to the original source of said fact(s).
Ferraripilot wrote:Charlie stoking the fires trying to get the smaller teams to protest what they're up to??
I'd imagine Horner right now putting an elastic band on the smaller teams nads, let 'em know that if anyone protests the big boy diffusers, he'll have his guys bolt on some options for Q1 and send the tail end of the grid whistling straight past 107%. Keep that up all year long if necessary.
As Fil says, if asked "can a team protest" then the answer would be "yes". A team could protest about anything if they like.
Anyway, if a team did protest at such late notice, then they'd handle it like the DDD as being too complex to solve in the weekend so they'd sort it out later.
Meanwhile there is a lot of press exposure about a new weapon in F1, and that pushes the ratings up just as Ernie is looking for a buyer.
Now the question remains, will they further their enquiries and appeal the results of the race?
Any post(s) made by this user are (semi-)educated opinion(s), based on random fact(s) blurred by the smudges of time.
Any fact(s) claimed by this user will be supplemented by a link to the original source of said fact(s).
Ted Kravitz on FP3 commentary has just talked about the possibility of a teams appealing. Whiting is reported as saying "I do hope that it doesn't come to that".
Also that the delay in the ban is due to the FIA needing more time to work out how to police the ban, and the teams needing more time to reconfigure the engines.
Last edited by Richard on 21 May 2011, 11:13, edited 1 time in total.
richard_leeds wrote:The FP3 commentary have just talked about the possibility of a teams appealing. Whiting is reported as saying "I do hope that it doesn't come to that"
Virgin are running the legal exhausts – pretest coming up.
Now the question remains, will they further their enquiries and appeal the results of the race?
William's has a tendency to cry and stamp their feet and scream "I don't want to"
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970
“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher